Man boobs @ 4:47. does it make it nsfw?

possibly NSFW due to boobs @4:43. I say possibly cause they are technically man-boobs

And acceptance of ladyboys really depends on who you are talking to. When I was in Thailand, I remember an old man who was complaining about all the ladyboys he sees now, and how he hates it. He said they hardly existed 20 years ago, but are everywhere [in Thailand] now.

Well, I wasn't trying to put down the larger/native guys. They are crazy strong as well, but hide it under a nice cushion. I would love a chance to see a match in real life :]

It's pretty cool seeing a westerner fight it out in such a niche and nationally-identified sport.

>> ^TheSofaKing:

>> ^PancakeMaster:
I know he looks small compared to his opponents, but damn do you see his muscles!? Dude's strong yo!

Yup. Who would of thought that an athletic, muscular guy would be better at sports than big fat Japanese guys with man boobs.

>> ^PancakeMaster:

I know he looks small compared to his opponents, but damn do you see his muscles!? Dude's strong yo!


Yup. Who would of thought that an athletic, muscular guy would be better at sports than big fat Japanese guys with man boobs.

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)

Can you guys quit talking about my moobs.>> ^therealblankman:

>> ^ant:
>> ^therealblankman:
>> ^ant:
Dag has man boobs though.

That's what I'm sayin'!

You said "I guess the receptionist is like @dag, except without the boobs." meaning he doesn't have boobs!

Please note the comma, and the subject of the sentence is clearly not Dag. The small boobs are attached both grammatically and literally to the receptionist.

>> ^ant:

>> ^therealblankman:
>> ^ant:
Dag has man boobs though.

That's what I'm sayin'!

You said "I guess the receptionist is like @dag, except without the boobs." meaning he doesn't have boobs!


Please note the comma, and the subject of the sentence is clearly not Dag. The small boobs are attached both grammatically and literally to the receptionist.

>> ^therealblankman:

>> ^ant:
Dag has man boobs though.

That's what I'm sayin'!


You said "I guess the receptionist is like @dag, except without the boobs." meaning he doesn't have boobs!

>> ^ant:

Dag has man boobs though.


That's what I'm sayin'!

Nicely made video, but also off the track.

Equating not using swear words all the time with not telling your kids where babies come from is not right. I prefer my kids to not use swear words because there's a time and a place for them, and an age. A kid saying 'fuck you man' is not funny, not cute, just seems wrong. A kid finding out that babies come from vaginas is cool, is right, is the way to go. A kid being shown graphic sex on the other hand 'Look son, this is how you get a woman pregnant' is not right.

Censorship (in theory) is there to protect those who aren't mature enough to handle the content, to contextualise it, to know real from make believe.

Censorship of violence and swearing vs sex is pretty fucked up these days. A youtube video can have the most violent of death scenes and someone swearing black and blue, but show a bit of sex and 'WOAH THERE TIGER, WHAT ARE YOU DOING?'

So yeah, I agree with him on that point.

But then he misses the point as to why breasts are covered up while man boobs are allowed... people aren't aroused by man boobs (ok, maybe some are), but breasts arouse a pretty damn large proportion of the male (and some female) population.

Not well thought out, not looking at it at all deeply at all.

If swear words weren't considered rude, and were just used all the time, then they'd lose their impact... so then people would just come up with other words to take their place that DO have impact.

The fight over swearing vs violence vs nudity is a valid discussion (can you believe that Chuck dickwad Norris made them keep the swearing down in The Expendables 2 so it could get a lower rating... you know, so the kids could still see all the mindless killing... awesome idea). Violence is allowed too much over nudity/sex. They come from a good place, violence does not.

Eh, I've rambled too much again. But basically. He got it wrong.

No, but it it works on 90 year old balls.

>> ^dag:

But I like saggy loose breasts. Also, does it work on man boobs?

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)

But I like saggy loose breasts. Also, does it work on man boobs?

Tags for this video have been changed from 'men, underwear, commercial, butts, balls, man boobs, pects, nude, naked' to 'men, underwear, commercial, butts, balls, man boobs, pecs, nude, naked' - edited by calvados

We all know you're a man parading as a woman in order to escape the oppressive gynofascist rule on the interwebs, own up!
>> ^UsesProzac:

Damn, you've found me out. ::sighs with relief and untucks her penis::
>> ^raverman:
Without a face shot there's a disturbing possibility this could be a man boob. Fappers be warned.