>> ^mizila:

at 1:43 you can clearly see her W-neck un-blurred, which reveals a disturbing lack of blur-worthy material (bewbs).

yes, major disappointment
i was hoping for xrated unblurred version but it's all fake

>> ^Sarzy:

>> ^ant:
>> ^burdturgler:
>> ^ant:
Yeah, sorry about that guys. Even thumbnails looked the same to me. Seriously, we need an undo/^z for this dupe.

Or I dunno .. maybe watch the video first before throwing down the first dupeof?

I don't want to have wait to buffer on my slow Internet connection.

Uh, yeah, it's really not a good idea to call a dupe if you're not watching the video in question. If you don't want to wait for the buffer, let someone else do it (especially since the so-called dupe in question had a different title, and one that implied it was a sequel to the first).


I did watch the first few seconds but those were the same with the rowdy teenagers/teens and substitute coming in. Then, I stopped and called a dupe.

http://videosift.com/video/The-Problem-with-Jeggings and http://videosift.com/video/Even-More-Problems-with-Jeggings are not dupes.

http://videosift.com/playlists/bareboards2/Dupes-Made-In-Error didn't work.

>> ^ant:

>> ^burdturgler:
>> ^ant:
Yeah, sorry about that guys. Even thumbnails looked the same to me. Seriously, we need an undo/^z for this dupe.

Or I dunno .. maybe watch the video first before throwing down the first dupeof?

I don't want to have wait to buffer on my slow Internet connection.


Uh, yeah, it's really not a good idea to call a dupe if you're not watching the video in question. If you don't want to wait for the buffer, let someone else do it (especially since the so-called dupe in question had a different title, and one that implied it was a sequel to the first).

>> ^Hybrid:

It's a shame it's not being added. An accidental dupe has just occurred that could have been saved by having a notadupe invocation called beforehand.


Ditto with http://videosift.com/video/The-Problem-with-Jeggings and http://videosift.com/video/Even-More-Problems-with-Jeggings are not dupes ...

Your *dupeof privilege has been revoked for blatant misuse. If you had watched just 2 seconds of both videos you'd have seen this wasn't a dupe. Due to your total lack of care in using this sensitive invocation, a lot of time and effort must now be wasted trying to undo the damage, and in the mean time, the video submitter will be losing votes and popularity.

In reply to this comment by ant:
*dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/The-Problem-with-Jeggings

Then don't do the invocation. How are you going to dupe a video you haven't even watched? I get that people make mistakes but seriously ..

In reply to this comment by ant:
>> ^burdturgler:

>> ^ant:
Yeah, sorry about that guys. Even thumbnails looked the same to me. Seriously, we need an undo/^z for this dupe.

Or I dunno .. maybe watch the video first before throwing down the first dupeof?


I don't want to have wait to buffer on my slow Internet connection.

>> ^burdturgler:

>> ^ant:
Yeah, sorry about that guys. Even thumbnails looked the same to me. Seriously, we need an undo/^z for this dupe.

Or I dunno .. maybe watch the video first before throwing down the first dupeof?


I don't want to have wait to buffer on my slow Internet connection.

>> ^ant:

Yeah, sorry about that guys. Even thumbnails looked the same to me. Seriously, we need an undo/^z for this dupe.


Or I dunno .. maybe watch the video first before throwing down the first dupeof?

>> ^gwiz665:

@<a rel="nofollow" href="http://videosift.com/member/Porksandwich" title="member since February 19th, 2010" class="profilelink">Porksandwich that one shouldn't have been duped. @ant and @<a rel="nofollow" href="http://videosift.com/member/Lann" title="member since May 11th, 2009" class="profilelink">Lann dun goofed.


Yeah, sorry about that guys. Even thumbnails looked the same to me. Seriously, we need an undo/^z for this dupe.

Ok, did something really REALLY stupid just now. I was trying to make just a comment and forgot to put a space in * isdupe so I really did *isdupe the video. For being a dumbass, I'm going to be throwing promotes at whoever sifted this video for a while.

Video I DESTROYED (there were 26 votes on it when this happened.)
http://videosift.com/video/Even-More-Problems-with-Jeggings?noredirect

yeah yeah yeah I'm writing lucky I feel like such a jerk dumb ass right now.

In reply to this comment by eric3579:
LOL

In reply to this comment by Lann:
@bareboards2 you are right, this is a good place for *notadupe (right before * isdupe called.)

Edit: noooooooooo! and fuck I wasn't thinking when I wrote the comment so I totally fucked shit up myself.

LOL

In reply to this comment by Lann:
@bareboards2 you are right, this is a good place for *notadupe (right before * isdupe called.)

Edit: noooooooooo! and fuck I wasn't thinking when I wrote the comment so I totally fucked shit up myself.

5 more comments have been lost in the ether at this killed duplicate.

This post has been seconded as a duplicate; transferring votes to the original video and killing this dupe - dupeof seconded with isdupe by Lann.