He needs a smaller jacket.

Crossing barbed wire with a dude lying across it? Yeah, that is exactly how it was done. Usually that guy got a leather jacket to wear and he would throw himself on top and people would walk over him. The motivation was pretty high to go fast, as usually there were bullets flying at you.

I used to have a fringe jacket ... LOVED it [good times]

White guy. In Thailand. In a Full Metal Jacket T-Shirt.

Classy.

I don't think Danielle has a high opinion of the anchor in the green jacket.

The pen at the end couldn't have possibly been the same one, unless the video was edited. After he takes the pen he touches Lauer only one time, and is nowhere near his jacket pocket. I assume *a* pen with a torn $100 was in there from the get-go, rather than it being the same item.

Near Infrared sensitive camera, with the guys wearing jackets which show up as mauve due to reflecting infrared? I have a feeling it might be something like that, but I'm not certain.

"Editors note: This story was initially reported on January 30th citing a press release on the Iranian, Pars Oil and Gas website. $40 million was the number placed on the value of what sank off Iran.

An update from the Pars Oil and Gas website today proves what is abundantly clear by watching this video. The sinking structure is the “jacket,” or the structure used to support the topside production facility which has yet to be installed. Jackets such as this one do not cost $40 million to make.

We apologize for making this out to be more than it is, but considering we don’t speak Persian and Google Translate pretty much sucks, getting the real facts is a challenge sometimes.

If we get any further updates, we’ll pass them along."
http://gcaptain.com/watch-irans-40-million-platform/

Harlequinn I would say you are correct. Only metal spoons aren't harmful to anyone (accept those like myself with a metal allergy..) and the guns that will eventually be unavailable can mow down a dozen people in about 30 seconds, blasting them into bits. So, it's a bit different.

I personally feel the solution to 'assault weapons' is to make them available at gun ranges. That way folks who want to be able to fire them, can still have access to them, but they are still restricted to have in ones home and thus cannot be used in violence. Just the way some shooting ranges offer military weapons a civilian cannot get access to any other way.

And for the record I'm relatively pro-gun. I don't own any but I grew up with them, received my first as a birthday present when I was 10 and my mother owns two and her boyfriend makes his own rifles for use in competition.

If congress manages to only do one thing about the gun violence in this nation, I'd personally rather see it be a national gun registry that would allow instant background checks at gun shows/etc. You know things are bad when someone on the terror watch list can buy an AR-15 with a 100 round magazine, armor piercing bullets and a flack jacket out of the back of a van and it's perfectly legal in some states. That's an extreme example I grant, but not unrealistic.

The straight-jacket for babies is essential.

Gonna go watch me some season 4 premier episode. While shit-faced. In a smoking jacket.

The problem is the current systems in check to prevent criminals from obtaining guns to kill people has been laughably de-balled and stripped down over the last decade +. When a felon can go to some of these 'no gun laws' states and buy an assault rifle with a 100 round drum, a glock with a 16 round clip, armor piercing ammunition and a flack jacket from the back of some guys van and it is 100% legal.. something is terribly wrong.

I do agree that this tends to get rather overboard. I'd much rather see assault rifles available for use at firing ranges instead of being personally owned vs outright outlawing them that will only cause other potential issues. I also agree 'assault weapons' is a buzzword.. though some weapons most certainly qualify (especially if the military classifies a weapon as such).

As to legalizing drugs, I wouldn't personally want to legalize 'all' drugs, but when there is already a dangerous, highly addictive drug that costs the country and states millions and takes/ruins thousands of lives a year, it seems to me that keeping a certain drug highly illegal to the point that in some states being caught with a gram can net you 10 years in prison.. there is something horribly wrong with the system.

I spent several months in LA for work last spring (Huntington Beach area to be specific) and besides the beautiful weather the culture and people drove me NUTS. Thankfully one of my oldest friends moved out there not to long ago so we got a spend a good bit of time hanging out and he felt much the same way.

I'm sure right now he's laughing his ass off at his neighbors putting jackets on their dogs when they take them out to pee, themselves bundled up in fleece jackets. Most of them wouldn't last a week in upstate NY on an average February day.

Not sure what;s going on.
The woman with the dark jacket/yellow spots starts to push the kid around. The the other guy steps in and grabs her by the hair and then forces her off the bus.

I can't understand what they are saying. The titles doesn't make sense to what I am seeing. What is going on here?