>> ^truth-is-the-nemesis:

gandalf is right! - ron burgundy Paul is a Anti-war candidate, unless of course all members of congress agree by a large percentage to invade Iran or Syria, then it's just fine & dandy. & what are the chances of THAT happening?...



Actually, he is still against war and is for dialog... I think he has stated that in EVERY speech and debate he has ever made... Face it, that argument of yours is superficial at best and beneath you Mr. Truth...

In fact, Paul goes on to include sanctions in the category of war--something "anti-war" hypocritical advocate as an alternative to war. (Like tazing someone in the head 20 times instead of shooting him...)

@marinara

I will only support DTF if he gives out free promotes to me!

@dystopianfuturetoday

You know I am racist right? I don't like it--but that is how life has formed me... A group treats me with hate, I treat them back in kind motherfucker... The same reason I hate redneck country bumpkins... much like the hate spewed against Cops, Conservatives and the religious on this site, now that I think of it. (Oh, and it's also the reason I am fine with African Americans. For the most part I have had great experiences with most.)

Now, there are limits. I don't allow it to affect the way I treat people--all are equal. I don't teach it to my children. And I don't preach it.

But to blame Paul for writing (Perhaps he did or did not, I don't care) a paper years ago is utterly ridiculous. People change, who knows. You certainly don't. All I know is he hasn't wrote new hate since then, or at least it isn't widely known.

And, I might add, politicians have done far worse to obtain office than pander to the racist elements. (I still don't condone it.)

gandalf is right! - ron burgundy Paul is a Anti-war candidate, unless of course all members of congress agree by a large percentage to invade Iran or Syria, then it's just fine & dandy. & what are the chances of THAT happening?...

>> ^Fletch:

Wow, even more abuse after trying to be so nice. However, I won't let anything you say ever make me sad because I realize it's all just an effect of your condition. I will persevere and just be grateful that you are still able to form at least some very sentence-like groupings of words. It's not exactly an ideal method of communicating with you, but you say so much by what you don't say. Just know that I know. I always have.
I'm just concerned, ST. Are you off your Zolpidem? I read it may benefit those in a PVS, but you have to stick to the prescription. If I may say so, because I care, you seem to be displaying several symptoms of withdrawal: regression, paranoia, NPD, unintelligible outbursts, feelings of being watched, sophmoric ad-hominem, punctuation deficiency...
I'll try to clarify what I was saying above, since the parsing of implicit expression often escapes one so stricken. You have a good man. A damn good man! Lean on him and let him help you while you can. You are as blessed to have landed him now as his next wife will be after he wins the support of the Court to remove your feeding tube. "And that is an encouraging thought." -Gandalf
>> ^Issykitty:
Precious, even for an insecure ass-clown misogynist channeling Mel Gibson. Oh, and I ignored you first. NEENER NEENER
>> ^Issykitty:
CREEPY Cat Video Stalking Jealous douche REAALLY wants attention! Let's pity the clown.



@Fletch so desperate and sad. Like I said before, I kindly suggested you to get therapy, sweetums. These cries for attention are getting old, yet you just keep coming back again and again. Comments are on ignore, so whatever you are saying at this point is getting forwarded. Cheers!

Wow, even more abuse after trying to be so nice. However, I won't let anything you say ever make me sad because I realize it's all just an effect of your condition. I will persevere and just be grateful that you are still able to form at least some very sentence-like groupings of words. It's not exactly an ideal method of communicating with you, but you say so much by what you don't say. Just know that I know. I always have.

I'm just concerned, ST. Are you off your Zolpidem? I read it may benefit those in a PVS, but you have to stick to the prescription. If I may say so, because I care, you seem to be displaying several symptoms of withdrawal: regression, paranoia, NPD, unintelligible outbursts, feelings of being watched, sophmoric ad-hominem, punctuation deficiency...

I'll try to clarify what I was saying above, since the parsing of implicit expression often escapes one so stricken. You have a good man. A damn good man! Lean on him and let him help you while you can. You are as blessed to have landed him now as his next wife will be after he wins the support of the Court to remove your feeding tube. "And that is an encouraging thought." -Gandalf

>> ^Issykitty:

Precious, even for an insecure ass-clown misogynist channeling Mel Gibson. Oh, and I ignored you first. NEENER NEENER
>> ^Issykitty:

CREEPY Cat Video Stalking Jealous douche REAALLY wants attention! Let's pity the clown.

Christians are under a New Covenant and don't follow those laws. They were made for a time and place in history. There is no excuse defacing the bible, or encouraging others to do so.

>> ^gorillaman:
>> ^shinyblurry:
I liked Ian as Gandalf, although I thought the books were a bit better than the movies, however, I dont like that Ian is encouraging thousands (millions?) of people to deface the bible, a criminal act when it is other peoples property btw, and which is completely irresponsible and immature, not to mention ridiculous. What's going on is that Ian doesn't like that look in the mirror, so he tries to shatter the reflection.
Ian McKellen - encouraging people to tear a page out of the bible.
The Bible - encouraging people to KILL IAN MCKELLEN.

>> ^shinyblurry:

I liked Ian as Gandalf, although I thought the books were a bit better than the movies, however, I dont like that Ian is encouraging thousands (millions?) of people to deface the bible, a criminal act when it is other peoples property btw, and which is completely irresponsible and immature, not to mention ridiculous. What's going on is that Ian doesn't like that look in the mirror, so he tries to shatter the reflection.

Ian McKellen - encouraging people to tear a page out of the bible.
The Bible - encouraging people to KILL IAN MCKELLEN.

I liked Ian as Gandalf, although I thought the books were a bit better than the movies, however, I dont like that Ian is encouraging thousands (millions?) of people to deface the bible, a criminal act when it is other peoples property btw, and which is completely irresponsible and immature, not to mention ridiculous. What's going on is that Ian doesn't like that look in the mirror, so he tries to shatter the reflection.

>> ^holymackerel013:
>> ^shinyblurry:
Professor Tolkien would not approve. Ian obviously feels threatened by Gods judgement on his lifestyle, and well he should be, but to boast about defacing the bible on television takes it to a whole other level of criminality and rebellion. All I have to say is that you reap what you sow.

What?....Gandalf is...GAY!? OH NO...why did nobody ever tell me! I guess I'm not allowed to watch my favourite movies & I've been so excited about the upcoming Hobbit movies. Why God? Why does he have to be gay?

>> ^ChaosEngine:

>> ^ponceleon:
OMG Yes... I definitely hear where Dystopian is coming from, but frankly I loved the way that Jackson and crew improved upon the original books for the LOTR. Feel free to flame me, but I actually enjoyed the movies MORE than the books on a lot of levels. There are exchanges in the book that just aren't as natural or tight as they are in the movie and I know this is likely heresy, but I feel like there are some which were even improved. The perfect example is the exchange between Bilbo and Gandalf towards the beginning of the FOTR, particularly after the party when they are discussing Bilbo's departure and the leaving of the ring behind...

If you're going to be flamed, then let me get my asbestos jacket, 'cos I agree with you. LOTR is an undisputed classic, but it wasn't without it's problems. Tolkiens pacing was terrible and some of the characters (looking at you, Tom Bombadil) add nothing to the story. The first half of book 6 is essentially "Sam and Frodo keep walking to mount doom", but it really drags.
Jackson and Walsh's story is better structured.

I'll go even farther...Tolkien was a top-notch world-builder, but he was a crappy storyteller. His stories were dry, boring, and flat-out hard to read (e.g. three names for every individual, all sounding so similar as to be virtually impossible to differentiate). Now, the world was so amazing that it took me nearly two decades of annual re-readings to come to this conclusion. But in the end, I see no other way to describe his work.

Jackson and Co. did a remarkable job of making it better while keeping the world mostly intact.

>> ^ponceleon:

OMG Yes... I definitely hear where Dystopian is coming from, but frankly I loved the way that Jackson and crew improved upon the original books for the LOTR. Feel free to flame me, but I actually enjoyed the movies MORE than the books on a lot of levels. There are exchanges in the book that just aren't as natural or tight as they are in the movie and I know this is likely heresy, but I feel like there are some which were even improved. The perfect example is the exchange between Bilbo and Gandalf towards the beginning of the FOTR, particularly after the party when they are discussing Bilbo's departure and the leaving of the ring behind...


If you're going to be flamed, then let me get my asbestos jacket, 'cos I agree with you. LOTR is an undisputed classic, but it wasn't without it's problems. Tolkiens pacing was terrible and some of the characters (looking at you, Tom Bombadil) add nothing to the story. The first half of book 6 is essentially "Sam and Frodo keep walking to mount doom", but it really drags.

Jackson and Walsh's story is better structured.

OMG Yes... I definitely hear where Dystopian is coming from, but frankly I loved the way that Jackson and crew improved upon the original books for the LOTR. Feel free to flame me, but I actually enjoyed the movies MORE than the books on a lot of levels. There are exchanges in the book that just aren't as natural or tight as they are in the movie and I know this is likely heresy, but I feel like there are some which were even improved. The perfect example is the exchange between Bilbo and Gandalf towards the beginning of the FOTR, particularly after the party when they are discussing Bilbo's departure and the leaving of the ring behind...

You know who else does this? Gandalf, that's who!

What's Gandalf doing in a corvette?

Tags for this video have been changed from 'gandalf, lord of the rings, dumbledore, harry potter, epic rap battles' to 'gandalf, lord of the rings, dumbledore, harry potter, epic rap battles, nice peter' - edited by xxovercastxx