That was pretty good. Only missing one thing:

http://videosift.com/video/Oh-Yeeeeah-Doo-Ow-Ow-Chick-Chicka-Chickaah

I can not believe such discrimination towards chicks with dicks.

What backward thinking people, they must be conservatives.

Where is the outrage?

Yeah, yeah, yeah, *shakes head* Toronto media goes two for two on mucking up Tom Hardy questions. It was a Toronto reporter that asked him the Mad Max "chick flick" question in Cannes.

Man, our media is terrible. =(

Kept asking "who's that chick?" Finally came to me (by way of the YouTube description). It's Arianny Celeste, which surprises me. She looks better here than I ever remember seeing her before.

It must be the lingerie. I guess it works.

*promote

You know he's definitely banging the hentai chicks

i tried..i really really tried,but i realized around the 14 minute mark that i really didn't care.

if this is the cross this woman wishes to bear and bring light to the masses regarding this horrid,society crushing trope,have at it miss outrage.

speaking only for myself i do not find this a serious enough issue to really waste my time on.

maybe if she had a video of a hot chick taking off her clothes i would watch the whole video.

I know Republicans have dumb-asses on their side but you have to admit this chick isn't much better. After all she is the Democrat party leader.

Really. Public figures have less expectations of privacy. The difference between Wiener's wiener and 'The Fappening' is how the material was accessed and disseminated. And I'm not saying either is not a problem, but I'm saying that Wiener was a married elected official who chose to send dick picks to chicks other than his wife while in office. And then some of the recipients provided the material to the media, which isn't the same as an ex-lover self-publishing. And 'The Fappening' was a lapse of security of the cloud, right? So I don't see causation of similarity.

@GenjiKilpatrick -- I'm sure you could contact Anthony Wiener and get more pics. And I definitely wouldn't say leaked nudes is perfectly acceptable and to be expected, but it's most likely to be expected because the technology and ramifications are new. Snowden said the NSA casually exchanged images of nude women (probably men, too), and they weren't celebrities. Of course, I'm sure neither Snowden or the NSA leaked them.

Do what the cop wants and everyone moves on. Right from the get go total lack of civility. Bogus stop or not.

@GenjiKilpatrick
I must admit that white privilege is working for the white chick.. Oh wait there is some evidence i see -- oh fuck she is obeying the officer.

Maybe the others could learn a thing a two on how to obey a cop. Have some fucking manners and listen.

But you can score with chick with that line!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t5q7Ag6j-ok

Sorry, but I'm 99.6% sure this is totally fake.
Watch the guy who removes them...he's already reaching for the first chick before it hits the pan, before it's even out of the egg...he totally knew it was coming.
Also, (if you've raised chicks, you know) chicks come out of an egg damp, these chicks were completely dry.
Now, look at the start of the video...notice that all 3 eggs are in the container in odd, raised up positions? Notice that he almost grabs the corner egg, then remembers that's not the one with a chick in it and grabs one of the raised eggs?
This was a blatant attempt to create business for their road side omelet stand....and I agree they should all be dropped onto a giant hot wok and have their feet burned to a crisp for this.

I don't know that this is fake. It happens all the time with eggs and hens that don't benefit from modern production methods of sorting.
(I never would have guessed I'd say something in favor of modern food production, but there you go?)
Anyway, I've had to do this myself when I was a kid, growing up on my families ranch. I doubt this was fake because of the reaction of the guys cooking, too, but if it were I'd hold all their faces to that frying pan for throwing three baby chicks onto a hot plate.

Totally fake. Notice the chicks are all perfectly dry, not how a chick comes out of an egg.

Ya, and the poor chicks, I bet they got burned pretty bad.

No sir....on all counts.

A cop's job is to 'serve and protect', to uphold the law, and promote public safety, not to pull over hot chicks in hopes he can trick them out of a blow job with the false promise of no ticket, not to perform public sex acts while shirking the job.

Corruptibility is not reduced when you allow those in power to accept any 'gift', it's amplified, because it now allows them to illegally sell their services and always claim they only took a gift.

Society only gains there if the cop PAY'S us that 'value' for receiving the valuable blow job AND gives back the money we paid him for that time period AND finds someone else qualified to do the job we were paying him to do....(or do we not need cops on the job, and it's just as good to have them off getting BJ's instead?) Since you want to give it to him for nothing, we totally lose, only the cop profits, not society. Does that really need to be said? We paid him for his time, she also 'paid' him, he didn't do what EITHER of us 'paid' him to do. Everyone but him lost...until he was caught, now we've all lost (we also lose all the money spent to train him, btw)