>> ^westy:
I don't mind if they eat it , it be far better if people had to go out and hunt meat to eat it , if meat was wiled it would have a happear life + less of aburdon on the enviroment.

True and bow hunting is more fair than gun hunting. But if he was a real man, he'd be armed with a homemade spear

Crossbow? What a lame-ass. Chicks only dig guys with bow-hunting skills.

I'd tell that kid to sit back because we're picking up GI Joe and Dora and going bow hunting.

I struggle consistantly as a meat-eater because I feel like a hypocrite. I definitely love the taste of meat, but I can't bring myself to think of actually killing an animal myself. As for killing an animal from a helicopter/plane, I dunno, it just doesn't seem THAT different from "on foot" hunting. Claims that the animal can only be wounded and therefore suffer a lot... well... are we assuming that people on foot are somehow perfect shots? What about bow-hunting?



Edit: oh, and Aniatario, even if they don't win, think of this: at least half of this country seems to think that they are viable right now... its not like winning the election suddenly gives you 100% support. Remember, it is a close race right now, even if Obama wins, a hell of a lot of people are still voting for McCain.

the looped 'woo' applaud track at the end is funny.

libertarians can seem like the hippy's older, somewhat-less sociable brother, who has an engineering degree, writes a lot of C++ and goes bow hunting for deer.