search results matching tag: bastards
» channel: weather
go advanced with your query
Search took 0.001 seconds
Videos (220) | Sift Talk (31) | Blogs (24) | Comments (1000) |
Videos (220) | Sift Talk (31) | Blogs (24) | Comments (1000) |
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
Python, Honey Badger & Jackals Fight Each Other
and no one gave a shit about the snake...... poor bastard.
Meet the Tesla Cybertruck
If I wasn't a poor bastard I would buy one. I like that they built something unique
Capitalism Didn’t Make the iPhone, You iMbecile
You lucky bastard, sounds like someone was spoiled with one of them fancy 56K modems...
All I know is that it took about 15 minutes to download one soft porn pic on Usenet newsgroup.
Magpie Swoops on Unlucky Mouse
Whenever I've had mice in the house (son not closing the door to garage all the way) they all leave dead... Screw those little bastards...
My Mom's Reaction If I Sleep With My Girlfriend Together
She keeps calling him a bastard, so she must have slept with her boyfriend.
"I LEARNED IT FROM YOU, MOM!" Would have been an epic response.
Back-To-School Essentials | Sandy Hook Promise
Thanks for the good questions.
a) yes
b) yes
c) no
d) yes
e) n/a
If you exclude suicide, the USA doesn't have a staggering rate of gun deaths. It is high compared to some other western countries, but on a world rate it is still very low.
When looking at public health (which is the reason for reducing gun violence) you need to be pragmatic. What will actually give a good outcome for public health? In this case there are about a half a dozen things that kill and maim US citizens at much higher rates than firearms do.
E.g. you are much more likely to be killed in a car crash than murdered by someone with a firearm. Cars by accident kill more people in the USA each year than firearms do on purpose. That's some scary shit right there. Think about that for a second, cars are more dangerous than firearms and people are not even trying to kill themselves or someone else with one. So as an example, you'd be better off trying to fix this first.
Or fix the suicide rate in the US. People aren't in a happy place there.
Obesity kills more people. Doctor malpractice kills more people. Etc. But these are hard issues to tackle that will cost billions or trillions. The low hanging fruit is firearms.
Free health care and mental health care, a better social security system, and various other means would all have magnificent outcomes on everyday life in the USA. But again, they cost a lot and require a paradigm shift.
Have you ever encountered interpersonal violence against you (i.e. had someone attack you)? Or have you maybe worked in a job where you often come into contact with people who have been attacked? I find people change their mind after they realize that they were only ever one wrong turn away from some crazy bastard who wanted to hurt them badly.
@harlequinn:
Putting the legal concerns (It is in the constitution, so we have to heed it) aside, what do you think about the Second Amendment?
Was it meant to enable the people to
a) defend against foreign incursion (in lieu of a standing army)?
b) defend against an oppressive government (as a militia)?
c) assume police duties?
d) defend themselves (in absence of police)?
e) none of the above? (Please state what you think its intended meaning was.)
For your selected reason/s given above, does it/do they still apply today?
What do you think is the reason for the staggering amount of gun violence/deaths in the USA when compared with other countries?
Is the reason for the Second Amendment worth the amount of gun violence in the USA?
Full disclosure:
I am genuinely interested in your answers since you seem to have given this some thought (an impression I frankly do not have about bobknight33) .
I am not from the USA and against any form of private gun ownership except under some very rare circumstances.
Cleveland Tourism Video, Second Try
Bastards, disabled on other sites.
*kill
Palm Tree Trimming Gone Bad
My memory of palmetto bugs is entering a room, turning on a light, three of the bastards turn around, look at me like they're sizing me up, and then scuttle away.
Insects making eye contact with a human is just fundamentally wrong. Insects whose concept of humans is anything less than an ineffable cosmic force have evolved beyond their allotted station and should be purged from existence. They can take their flaming death trees with them.
Those things are full of palmetto bugs (hence the name) and I can't imagine the number of them swarming out after it caught fire. Those things ick me out worse than regular roaches.
Mother and Son Witness Tornado Touching Down
I've been in every type of winter storm you can name (from Canada eh!), sandstorms in Saudi, monsoons in Thailand, typhoons in the Philippines, several wet seasons in northern Australia, and a fair few hurricanes here in Texas. But tornadoes - the tricky unpredictable bastards that you can't predict, plan for or gear up for, Mother Nature's switch blade, are the only things out there that freak me out.
"Holy shit, this is crazy" is the right response.
Plane Crash and Rescue from the Quebec Wilderness
lucky bastard
Shark Swallowed Whole during Deep-Sea Feeding Frenzy
As Fat Bastard once said: Get in mah belly!
The 7 Biggest Failures of Trumponomics
It's an extreme solution certainly, but not without merit. I doubt there'd ever be a willing acceptance of such a plan though, so a slightly more realistic solution would need to be moderated some. How's this for dystopian-but-not-quite-genocidal:
Worldwide lottery, a small percentage (total of 500M - 1B maybe) wins the right to live in what will be the new model of the world: something like what we have now, but with drastically reduced usage of non-renewable resources (until they can be replaced completely) and a target of zero negative impact on the environment as a whole. Still some version of democratic (generally at least), freedom of whatnot and such, open travel to the degree that sustainable transportation options allow, all the (again, sustainable) mod cons. I suppose different countries / regions could still run things according to their preferences, as long as the net-zero goal remains.
The other lottery entrants, the non-winners, don't need to die, hooray! They will however live on something akin to reservations, as serfs, without the right to further reproduce. These poor bastards, in exchange for not being outright murdered to save civilization, are to be consolidated into agricultural communes to do whatever they can to regrow the world's flora and fauna until they all eventually die. Their goal is not net-zero, but as far into the positive as possible. It would all be overseen according to some grand scheme(s) to be as beneficial for the overall future of humanity and life on Earth in general as possible.
Probably also unworkable, but preferable to megamurder?
A: Severe population control....preferably 30+ years ago. Today, it requires a massive cull and birth control. Maximum human population capped at 1 billion, preferably less.
Trump Voter Feels Betrayed By President
newt, you asshole. LOL
You said Bob but I think I was the target. Bastard.
@bobknight33, this is for you.
Duck family jumps into water
Unless momma duck thought this was her chance to lose the little bastards and get back out on the dating scene.
C-Note, thanks for posting this. It's the perfect antidote to all the "world is horrible, people are awful, and we're all gonna die!" videos.
People are Manipulating You on Facebook - Smarter Every Day
My wife says I have zeal and a passion for truth, but I'm otherwise an emotionless bastard....and that's why she loves me.
As long as we have @newtboy here, we're protected. And as far I know he's not a bot. Bot's don't have emotions.