Congratulations! Your comment on North Koreans weeping hysterically over death of Kim Jong-il has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.

See, the important Clinton here is Hillary. Despite your hope and your ignorant conflations, Bill is not running for the presidency. Hillary Clinton is just as moral as Reagan and Romney. (Period, but also specifically with respect to sexual indiscretions. She has been faithful. Don't take that away from her just because she's a woman.)

And with respect to the rape allegations, it's disingenuous to presume they're true. Bill Clinton was accused of rape, yes. But no charges were brought against him. Indeed, one of the women who accused him signed an affidavit saying that she was lying about the accusation and then later (now) wants to rescind her affidavit. Until there are charges it's just more bullshit to slander the Clintons.

(Trump, on the other hand, is actually facing charges soon regarding the rape of an underage girl.)

And if you think that a woman standing by her man when he's accused of rape isn't a beautiful thing, well, I would question your humanity. If Hillary hadn't stood by Bill it would have reflected poorly on him. That she did tips the scales in the other direction. Also, it reflects well upon her. (I am sure Melania will stand by Trump during his trial and that will speak well to both of them.)

Again, it comes down to allegations vs. facts. Your whole characterization of the Clintons is based on allegations. The right's characterization of the Clintons is based on allegations. All of the characterizations come down to histrionic allegations. The things that are facts that they've done wrong they've apologized for. Hillary apologized for using a personal e-mail server, despite the fact that it was common practice for people to use personal e-mail servers in the 2000's. Hillary has apologized for the mistake at Benghazi, despite the fact that many similar attacks happened under Bush/Cheney's watch. The allegations of 'voter fraud' in the Democratic primary are bad, but even Hillary's opposition sided with her in the end.

And there's really nothing else propping up the perception that Hillary is bad in any way other than these allegations. It's just a matter of the right's echo chamber (including you) repeating it over and over again, which anybody can see is totally devoid of substantive reason. People 'feel' like Hillary is bad, but there's nothing there to show it.

It is because there is indeed, nothing there.

But with respect to Trump he has shown time and time again that he is unfit for any office, that he will take personal advantage of any power given to him. He continues to act in a way antithetical to the position he seeks. They say that you should dress for the position you seek. If the position of the Presidency requires one to wear a button down shirt and nice slacks Trump is a drunk, dirty, smelly bum wearing a trenchcoat, running down the street with no self control, yelling about how great Putin and Kim Jong Il are, grabbing whatever pussy he can find.

This admission of sexual assault is just the final nail in the coffin for him. (Or perhaps just the latest final nail.) To speak of sexual assault as anything other than the dictionary definition of being unfit to be president is just wrong.

NK is an exceptional case. Trade is great, capitalism has given us great prosperity and freedom. I won't argue that. I think it's great that the black market allows unlocked mobile phones to pass into NK (mostly through China, somewhat ironically) to give the people there a window into the outside world. The suggestion that trade should be completely free from restriction because North Korea restricts trade to keep it's population ignorant and servile is obviously ridiculous. Nuance plz...

Interestingly Kim Jong Il was said to be a big film fan. He even kidnapped people to create a NK film industry.

I would say diplomacy as a solution to Islamic jihadism is as naive as was diplomacy with the nazis. Pakistan's current rule of law is the death penalty for blaspheming the name of the prophet, and not only is that too secular for the taliban jihadists, it is so intolerably so that they are waging a war against civilians over it. The proudly claim credit for shooting children on school buses, and proudly note their intent to finish Malala off if given the chance. What kind of diplomacy do you expect to see followed exactly?

Should Pakistan's military and police really refuse to meet the countless taliban attacks on civilian targets with no use of force? Should they really just proceed to try and talk to the criminals prosecuting these crimes every single week? I think it's a strategy doomed to horrific failure, and one that invariably leads to far more death and suffering.

History doesn't exactly bare out that ignoring dictators and extremists leads to them just giving up and playing nice. Brutality was terribly successful and effective for the Pharoahs. Same for the Caesars. Same for Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Kim Jong Il and on and on and on. There comes a point when failure to face evil with force just emboldens and strengthens it.

Kim Jong Il Makes Your Dreams Come True has been added as a related post - related requested by Norsuelefantti on that post.

Kim Jong Il Makes Your Dreams Come True has been added as a related post - related requested by Norsuelefantti on that post.

This video has been declared a duplicate by the original submitter; transferring votes to the original video and killing this dupe - dupeof declared by mintbbb.

*dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/Kim-Jong-Il-Makes-Your-Dreams-Come-True

This is essentially a dupe of this video: http://videosift.com/video/Kim-Jong-Il-Makes-Your-Dreams-Come-True

The video is all taken from the same footage but different music has been added. I'm not invoking Dupeof because they aren't exact - though I'm not sure if both versions need to exist.

You Choose...

The Brief History of Kim Jong Il has been added as a related post - related requested by chingalera on that post.

>> ^Sagemind:

WHAT??! - His grandson's name is Kim Han Solo??!! That's awesome


Had had ad, the same associative thought when hearing his name, shows ya how hard-wired it is in the culture..

Hey,

I have a newly sifted vid that is most likely a dupe of yours, but I can't see yours because it is region blocked. I was about to dupe it but noticed yours had sub titles on the thumbnail so I wasn't sure. I'll dupe it if you want to use the unblocked version

Link to my unblocked version. http://youtu.be/UEaKX9YYHiQ

Mine: http://videosift.com/video/Team-America-Im-So-Ronery
Yours: http://videosift.com/video/I-m-So-Ronery-by-Kim-Jong-Il-Team-America-World-Police

You misperred "brocked".
>> ^SlipperyPete:

blocked

I'm pretty sure this is a dupe of this: http://videosift.com/video/I-m-So-Ronery-by-Kim-Jong-Il-Team-America-World-Police but it's block for me. Can someone check and dupe if need be?