However much we disagree...
We aren't this.
US network faces $1m nudity fine
The FCC deems "sexual or excretory activities" shown in an "offensive" way before 2200 as indecent.
ABC has rejected the claims, saying the buttocks are not a sexual organ.
----
I agree with some of our decisions, but not all. Which is probably like most of us. We are a community and that's to be expected. But we can always look at examples like the one above and laugh.
US network faces $1m nudity fine
The FCC deems "sexual or excretory activities" shown in an "offensive" way before 2200 as indecent.
ABC has rejected the claims, saying the buttocks are not a sexual organ.
----
I agree with some of our decisions, but not all. Which is probably like most of us. We are a community and that's to be expected. But we can always look at examples like the one above and laugh.
4 Comments
"buttocks are not a sexual organ"??
Samwell would like to have a word with ABC.
This kind of BS is exactly why I got so riled up about the whole thing a couple of days ago. It's completely and utterly ridiculous. And sad, quite frankly.
Realizing that America was colonized by a bunch of Puritan with their knickers in a twist helps understand all of this. You suckers were smart to have gotten rid of them.
*sigh*
...Oh beautiful for spacious skies, for amber waves of grain...
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.