search results matching tag: whos line is it anyway

» channel: nordic

go advanced with your query
Search took 0.001 seconds

    Videos (103)     Sift Talk (5)     Blogs (18)     Comments (128)   

whos line is it anyway- Let's Make A Date - Bald Guys

brycewi19 (Member Profile)

Things you don't want to hear in a hospital

Things you don't want to hear in a hospital

Girls are Bad at Sound Effects II - Sci-Fi Edition

arvana (Member Profile)

Kevlar says...

Hey, no worries - sadly, no matter how much I search beforehand I still dupe maybe 33% of the time. Thanks for catching it!

In reply to this comment by arvana:
Great find, Kevlar, but although I hate to do this to you...
http://videosift.com/video/Whose-Line-Party-Quirks

In reply to this comment by Kevlar:
Hey Arvana, I've got one for your Whose Line playlist:

http://videosift.com/video/Whose-Line-Is-It-Anyway-Colin-The-Sex-Detective

Kevlar (Member Profile)

arvana (Member Profile)

Colbert Interviews Wikileaks Founder Julian Assange

burdturgler says...

It's hard to argue with you when you agree with me, but OK I'll try
You put so many questions and the quoting system is very difficult now so I will just run off the list.

-No, it wouldn't have got the same attention.
-No, it wouldn't have had the same impact.
-Yes, more people know about wikileaks now.

If the goal is popularity and impact, great! Again, I refer them to fox news for further lessons.

-Their credibility was only damaged with people who think editing for political impact is a disservice to the truth.

-Whether or not the edit concealed anything relevant or was misleading is for the viewer to decide. The problem is that the edited version is what is spread all over the net and that is what people are viewing everywhere. This was their goal. Yet how many of them are even aware of the unedited footage? WikiLeaks admits that only 10% of people have seen the unedited footage. The fact that they state they edited it for a political agenda tells me their goal is not to release the truth. I have no idea if even the unedited footage they have "released" is unedited.

They really have damaged their credibility in my mind with this one statement:

"we will edit any material you share with us to give you the maximum possible political impact for your agenda"

(I edited that statement of theirs, but it's basically true. Close enough. And that's what counts eh?)

bottom line .. for me anyway, I will still check them out and be glad to see what they have "leaked", but I will not take documents I see there at face value unless they are confirmed in some other way.

Labrador: Dog eating at the table.

Whose Line is it Anyway: 2 Line Vocab (Dangerous Mission)

brycewi19 says...

>> ^Mookal:
^
I'm sorry, I wasn't listening.
...


I said, perhaps you should pay attention to the humor of these people. These are professional comedians at their best!

Man, it's really hard playing the straight guy. I have no idea how Colin can do this and keep a straight face!

Whose Line is it Anyway: 2 Line Vocab (Dangerous Mission)

Whose Line is it Anyway: 2 Line Vocabulary (Who Needs This?)

Whose Line is it Anyway: 2 Line Vocabulary (Who Needs This?)

brycewi19 (Member Profile)



Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists

Beggar's Canyon