Your video, the fundamental underpants of our society...no...that's, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

This achievement has earned you your "Pop Star" Level 6 Badge!

I know you believe you are a brave awakened cassandra, privy to secret truths that others are not capable of understanding, but from outside this bubble, the image is less flattering.

I'm up to date on most of the major conspiracy theories, so it's not that I don't understand them or that I'm brainwashed by TV (I don't have TV service), it's just that I flat out reject them as unprovable foolishness.

I find conspiracy culture to be extremely lame, in the same way that I find Scientology and Magic Mormon Underpants to be lame, and have no problems saying so. When you accuse others of being unaware, gullible, mentally handicapped, unintelligent or lacking in reason, you do so from a very vulnerable position, because these are the same terms people use to describe conspiracy theorists.

In short, throwing stones from within a cathedral of glass is not without risk.

@chog

A lot of conservatives use this kind of 'I'm non-political', 'I'm non-partisan' type of language, usually in the middle of a highly political and partisan comment, as you have done here. Why is this? Do you not understand the meaning of these words?

You are extremely political and extremely conservative. Your views on race, guns, conspiracy theories, economics and the like are all pretty much your standard issue Texas Conservative fare.

I get that people would rather subscribe to elaborate fantasies about shadowy elite organizations seeking world domination than dealing with grim realities, but when you dilute serious conversations with dumb conspiracy theories, you are only serving as a distraction from the real life elite organizations that openly dominate our politics by light of day.

There are no reptilians or evil jewish bankers trying to enslave you. It's fiction, like Xenu and magic underpants.

I feel like this is just embarassing for both Murthy and Tarantino (acting like a kid).

I think that in his own mind, Murthy thinks that he's the hard hitting interviewer for the modern age, getting to the hard issues by asking the hard questions. We could do with one of those. But not talking to bloody Tarantino. How about having a go at David Cameron or something? This film director made a film and didn't force anyone to watch it so your tenacity is misplaced. Cameron has been forcing shit down our necks for years now and stealing money from our pockets, people want someone with tenacity to hound him until he breaks or screws up.

I'm just waiting for the one person to advocate guns for all AND complaining that movies promote violence. At that point you really may as well give up, grow your beard out and go live in a cave in just your underpants, cos there's no hope.

There is nothing sexier knee length underpants an cotton underwire bras. >> ^Stormsinger:

Anyone jerking off to this probably still jerks off to the Sears catalog too.

I know Penn is making a fine argument, but magic underpants aside: ALL religion is just like this. Mormons are NOT special here, but maybe they make it easier to see sometimes.

It is not made for those that are intellectually honest nor intellectually curious to a fault.

It is the truth of this world and moreover the truth withing our psychology, a truly terrifying notion to any religion believer that EVER happens to fully understand the mind. Your mind can act very much like a paradox, in this, it allows for the most immense blockades to be made so that no one, not even themselves can truly ever tell themselves the truth--EVEN IF in front of them. Because, as one thing is absolutely certain: humans are driven by fear.

ONLY those that have conquered fear truly acknowledge the world as it is, though they do STILL fear, but they fear things that are logical, like losing loved ones or becoming a victim of intellectual deception yourself...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Landrover_Serie_I_von_1952.jpg

hmmmm... Then this guy must be doing it wrong? Besides, your whole damn island puts the steering wheel on the wrong side.

>> ^Quboid:

>> ^bmacs27:
>> ^Quboid:
@bmacs27, what's wrong with it?

What are you, British?

Yes, and so was Land Rover when this was designed. Don't mess with me, my Land Rover experience comes from the Commandos: soldiers so badass, they don't wear underpants (I might be getting that that wrong).

>> ^bmacs27:

>> ^Quboid:
@bmacs27, what's wrong with it?

What are you, British?
Yes, and so was Land Rover when this was designed. Don't mess with me, my Land Rover experience comes from the Commandos: soldiers so badass, they don't wear underpants (I might be getting that that wrong).

SHUT UP AND TAKE MY UNDERPANTS!!!

>> ^brycewi19:

I was kinda hoping it were Karen Gillan's underpants.
But, no, an oven mitt is nice, too.


That's how Amy Pond rolls. With oven mitt underwear.

I was kinda hoping it were Karen Gillan's underpants.

But, no, an oven mitt is nice, too.

>> ^rychan:

>> ^xxovercastxx:
I think this is the computer he's referring to at the end:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atanasoff%E2%80%93Berry_Computer

Yeah, that's a very, very tenuous claim to call that the first "computer". It's closer to a calculator as it is not programmable / general purpose.


Indeed, not to mention that most of the work had already been done in mechanical form by the likes of Babbage, etc. To say "the computer was invented in Iowa" is a bit of a broad brush. It would be truer to say that the first example of an electronic computer was built in Iowa.

That said, well done on choosing the least idiotic of the republican candidates. The fact that said candidate believes in magic underpants is more a reflection of the incredibly poor gop lineup than on Iowans.