Nice compilation. It's convenient to have such a large collection of top ten sifts from the last five years all in one place.

I can't stand this song personally, but anything is better than the original. Plus, qruel is just a top ten username of all time.

David Letterman's Final Top Ten List has been added as a related post - related requested by eric3579.

Another vid from Daves last episode http://videosift.com/video/David-Lettermans-Final-Top-Ten-List

i simply ask those people, "do you believe slavery is wrong?"

because the only mention of slavery that i'm aware of in the bible, is that you should treat your slaves well.
not only is that not a condemnation, it's tacit approval.

so if religion is the source of morality, how do you know slavery is wrong?

even just using god's name as a swear word makes the top ten list of hell-worthy offenses, but one of the most barbaric crimes i can imagine doesn't, and it even gets an implied thumbs-up in the fine print?

religion is not the source of anyone's morality.
it's the enforcement system we invented, for those of us so morally bankrupt that they can't see a good deed as its own reward.

VideoSift Sarzy's Top Ten Movies of 2014 has been added as a related post - related requested by eric3579 on that post.

VideoSift Sarzy's Top Ten Movies of 2014 has been added as a related post - related requested by eric3579 on that post.

VideoSift Sarzy's Top Ten Movies of 2014 has been added as a related post - related requested by eric3579 on that post.

VideoSift Sarzy's Top Ten Movies of 2014 has been added as a related post - related requested by eric3579 on that post.

VideoSift Sarzy's Top Ten Movies of 2014 has been added as a related post - related requested by eric3579 on that post.

and done.
http://videosift.com/video/VideoSifts-Sarzys-Top-Ten-Movies-of-2014

Thanks Sarzy - always interested in your thoughts on film. I'm surprised how many of your top ten I've seen, and enjoyed them all. Will give Interstellar a go when I can find it in a cinema - I confess to believing the negative reviews given how many they were.

TOP TEN REASONS

1) Small pot

2) Small kids that slurp longer pieces

3) Awesome snappy noise and stuff'

4) Me strong like Hulk prove by smashing spaghettis smash smash

5) Visualizing your mean annoying boss's neck while twisting crick crack shatter

6) Teaching child division and/or fractions

7) Having less sophisticated in-law over who would otherwise maul linguini with multiple passes of a knife before eating

8 ) Telling parable of "united we stand divided we fall" to less patriotic younger generation representatives, and needed a prop.

9) Secretly mad at spouse and prepping mysterious "I don't know how all those spaghettini shards on the floor happened but it's your time to sweep here's the broom" petty vengeance

10) Destroying stuff is fun.

I was clear from the beginning that I came to lend a Christian voice to the sift. I enjoyed videosift and had been using it for some time before I created an account. I registered an account specifically because of the number of anti-christian videos that I was noticing were hitting the top ten. I wanted to engage with the people here over the topic of Christianity because the sift was, and primarily still is, an echo chamber for the worldview of secular humanism. That's the way the sift likes it, and the sift is intolerant of any voice which challenges that viewpoint. Period, end of story.

There's nothing wrong with my coming to represent Christ, here. Have I utterly failed to do so? Yes, most definitely. However, it is up to me how I want to use this site. I have commented here almost exclusively on religious topics, either on my videos or someone elses it. Occasionally I will comment on a political video or something else, but usually only on religious topics. The point being is that, that is the way I have chosen to use this site. I don't run around and dictate to anyone else how they could or should use the sift, so why should I be singled out? I didn't cause any material harm to anyone, I wasn't off topic, I didn't flout the rules. I was on topic on the videos I commented on, and I brought a Christian viewpoint to the discussion. The sift, being inhabited primarily by atheists, agnostics and anti-theists, utterly rejects that viewpoint. It's not any different if I were to go to the comments section of any major website and say anything positive about Christianity. I would instantly get 2 to 3 comments mocking everything I said.

I stated in my post that I realized that bringing a Christian viewpoint to the sift would get me a lot of flak. I didn't always react well to that, and I acted like a jerk at times. I am sorry for that. I could have done more to build relationships here and I never put in the time. There is some truth to what you have said, that I brought the way I was treated on myself. But your rant is also a product of the simplistic and distorted lens that you view me through. I mean, you on one hand call my treatment here a persecution fantasy and on the other hand say I brought it upon myself. That's just intellectual dishonesty, pure and simply. The truth is, there was a concerted campaign to deny my participation on this site, and whatever you think the reason may be, it did happen.

As to the video, if this video was of a senior consultant from the Bush administration admitting that they systemically deceived the American people this would be #1 on the sift. You're deceiving yourself if you think that the reason this video is being suppressed is due to anything other than the ideological bent of the sift.

I wonder how many of you had to take a test to get hired, a test that 200-300 people took, then took the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality inventory test, and to score in the top ten, then to be interviewed by a sociologist or psychotherapist, then a psychiatrist, then interviewed by the head of the organization and two other representatives of the local governing authority?

That's what I thought.