search results matching tag: text

» channel: nordic

go advanced with your query
Search took 0.005 seconds

    Videos (597)     Sift Talk (137)     Blogs (124)     Comments (1000)   

geo321 (Member Profile)

God damnit Chug.

surfingyt says...

You cherry picked the portions of his text that you could straw man (timeline of death, your apparent ignorance that animal abuse is a thing that happens and taking the term "throw" literally).

The reality is that what he said is true: The cow is doomed and will be killed using the methods he described.

visionep said:

Why would someone beat their animals? It would just stress them out so the animals will get sick and probably die, losing the farmer money. And who can pick up 500 lbs to throw it into a truck? Your characterization is unrealistic and likely stems from your concern for the animals, which is admirable, but isn't based in reality.

How Beavers Build Dams | Leave it to Beavers | PBS

notarobot says...

For a more complete story about the beaver, why not contact the Canadian Wildlife Service in Ottawa?



Back-To-School Essentials | Sandy Hook Promise

notarobot says...

@BSR

There is still sanity. There is always sanity, you just have to look for it.

Remember to look for the helpers.


BSR said:

Thanks for reminding me there was once sanity.

Voting Machines: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO)

notarobot says...

Tom Scott talks about this a bit.


Dr. Bart Ehrman Historically accurate criticism of the Bible

vil says...

If so many people think God wrote a book IMHO it becomes relevant to study it at least superficially just so you can co-exist and communicate with all these people.

The stories in the book are mostly not history but the book itself and how it came to be certainly is.

Seriously if God is omnipotent and knows everything this book of his shows a strong sense of humor rather than much intelligent design. Like having bits and pieces garbled by running them back and forward through ancient humanoid versions of modern day OCR, machine translation and political censorship.

I love the Septuaginta bit (not in this video) where mythically 70ish scholars were secluded for 70ish days and each came up with his own Greek translation and they were all mythically identical. Where in reality the translation took decades, was a team effort that garbled the texts to appease current rulers and added whole new books.

simonm (Member Profile)

simonm (Member Profile)

Back-To-School Essentials | Sandy Hook Promise

notarobot says...


Back-To-School Essentials | Sandy Hook Promise

newtboy says...

So you think machine guns aren't firearms...or do you think they aren't really illegal?

Edit: What about bazookas, grenades, mortars, etc.?
They are firearms by the federal definition....https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/921

(3)The term “firearm” means (A) any weapon (including a starter gun) which will or is designed to or may readily be converted to expel a projectile by the action of an explosive; (B) the frame or receiver of any such weapon; (C) any firearm muffler or firearm silencer; or (D) any destructive device. Such term does not include an antique firearm.
(4)The term “destructive device” means—
(A)any explosive, incendiary, or poison gas—
(i)bomb,
(ii)grenade,
(iii)rocket having a propellant charge of more than four ounces,
(iv)missile having an explosive or incendiary charge of more than one-quarter ounce,
(v)mine, or
(vi)device similar to any of the devices described in the preceding clauses;

harlequinn said:

The 2A specifically says "arms". There is plenty of debate and case law regarding what arms they meant. Suffice to say there isn't a shadow of a doubt that it means firearms (long and short) of all varieties commonly available.

"doesn't mention anything about not restricting the types of armaments people can use"

It does restrict the government from making laws in this regard. The 2A is a law restricting government, not the people. "shall not be infringed" literally means you shall make no law that affects this right in any way.

Who launched the drone attack against Saudi oil facilities?

notarobot says...

There are commercially available drones that have a large enough cargo capacity off-the-shelf to for delivery of a big enough explosive to start a fire that could be quite destructive if delivered to the right location. Just $5k or $10 will be enough for each aircraft itself. Depending on how close the pilots want to be they could go as cheap as $1k for each drone, maybe lass.

Lucky for the Yemeni the technology in this video won't be available for another 3-5 years....



*quality *promote

Hitler reaction to a Jew playing him in the film JoJo Rabbit

eric3579 says...

Here is the trailer if you are curious


When a German Bf-109 spared a stricken American B-17

eric3579 says...

Pilots Franz Stigler and Charlie Brown's first meeting


The Peanut Butter Falcon | Featurette "Zack's Story"

eric3579 says...

Here is the trailer for those who may not have seen it.


First Class Bus Stop

eric3579 says...

More George Barratt-Jones




Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists

Beggar's Canyon