That is by far the dumbest thing I’ve heard this century.

I know he can’t help that he’s a rapist at this point, but is being a total supervillain the image he’s going for? It’s the one he projects.

You’ve really lost your shit if you think this doesn’t make you look irrationally triggered. 😂

3.6%
Remember Trump’s 14.7% unemployment rate!? Remember a negative 2.3% gdp for the year!?! -😂
Always moving the goal post when your predictions fail. That’s not what you said.
You said the revised numbers from May would get worse, they got better.
You said June numbers would be worse, they were better, well above predictions, then revised up.
You said the fed raising interest rates would blow up unemployment and crash gdp, the exact opposite has happened consistently.
You said give it time, July will be worse, July GDP, unemployment, and inflation numbers beat expectations again, by a shitload.
Feds already raised rates, inflation dropped, gdp blew up, unemployment stayed historically low, stock markets boomed…your predictions of a crash evaporated. Try again.

At this rate, we would need to wait enough time for Trump or another failure and moron to have controlled the economy for 6 months before we can expect a downturn…ain’t ever gonna happen, only cultists want a repeatedly convicted treasonous supervillain that created the worst modern economic disaster for president and your people are leaving the cult, not joining up... Sucker.

Stick with Jim/Don until he passes out the flavoraid…I recommend Orange, it covers the cyanide taste. You think I’m joking, but the day will come when he says it’s time for you to die for him…actually that was in 2020 during covid and on Jan 6, but it will come again….time my friend, just give it time,
In the mean time, the economy is soaring contrary to 100% of your predictions for months/years. 😂

Now turns out even his name is a lie. An effort to hide from prosecution.
He committed multiple different campaign finance frauds and crimes, took tons of illegal foreign contributions and hid them, and embezzled almost all of what was donated.
Or in the eyes of Republican leadership….he’s our guy, did nothing wrong, no problem lying about literally everything, no problem with his embezzlement, no problem he’s a fugitive, no problem he took tens- hundreds of thousands from hostile foreign powers, he gets committee assignments and no ethics investigation, and certainly not censure or removal under any circumstances because we need his vote that we assume will be with us.

Party of fraud, lies, and corruption at every turn, every single one to extremes never dreamed of before supervillain disgraced ex president Trump made constant hyper criminality a main feature of the failing disgraced Republican Party.

I don't think they could really present the original storyline in a cinematic format. The comic worked because they were able to employ the ENTIRE Marvel universe, and reference years and years of superhero / supervillain interactions. With a drastically more limited cast and history the story simply wouldn't feel right. They're still using the general concept of the story it appears, but in a significantly more limited context.

I think my only complaint will be that they're not pulling the television characters into CW, but perhaps (hopefully!) they're saving the full-cast spectacle for Infinity War.

Lots of mixed emotions about this...
We went from one superhero and one villain and a fairly simple story in the first movie to three - maybe four - superheroes and at least two supervillains in the second.
Seems like they are trying to jam a LOT into this movie and it could collapse under the weight of it all.

Your video, Elon Musk might be a Supervillain, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

Isaac Asimov looks like Bill Nye goes full supervillain over the next 20 years.

brilliant + redhead + x(bad relationships) = Supervillain

Rise, Bugman, rise! Cleanse the world of its human pests! (Great supervillain origin story)

Brilliant!

I'd say that this video made me "lol", which is true, but that doesn't quite accurately capture it. What is the internet acronym for a supervillain "muahahahahaha" combined with a Mr. Burns style "eeexcellent"?

wow, this is like straight out of a movie in which McCain is cast as a reluctant supervillain. The way the woman asks that question (was she coached? prodded? how did she manage to destroy her self-respecting femininity like that?) suggests that there would be some evil stroking of cats in the next scene...

>> ^NetRunner:

>> ^blankfist:
^Thank you, Adrian Veidt.

I'm touched that you think I'm comparable to a superhero/supervillain, even if he was a left-wing straw man to be torn down by a right-wing cartoonist.
Seriously though, you seem to have bought into this idea that actually learning about stuff is for suckers, because everything in life is intuitive, and never requires more than a couple simple aphorisms to explain.
For example, right wing economics: Debt bad, strong currency good, unions bad, low taxes good, non-defense spending bad, free trade good, regulation bad.
All of those things are wrong at least some of the time, based on any actual objective look at economic history.


I'm not interested in your narrative. But I'm glad you think Moore is a right wing cartoonist. He's a regular George W. Bush to you, I'm sure.

"Learning about stuff" is great; never said I had a problem with it. I just don't want people like you, who think they're smarter than the rest of the population, getting a big head and trying to plan our lives. That's exactly what you want though. That's why I call you Veidt. Because you're the worst kind of central planner. You're the kind that thinks he's smarter than everyone else.

>> ^blankfist:

^Thank you, Adrian Veidt.


I'm touched that you think I'm comparable to a superhero/supervillain, even if he was a left-wing straw man to be torn down by a right-wing cartoonist.

Seriously though, you seem to have bought into this idea that actually learning about stuff is for suckers, because everything in life is intuitive, and never requires more than a couple simple aphorisms to explain.

For example, right wing economics: Debt bad, strong currency good, unions bad, low taxes good, non-defense spending bad, free trade good, regulation bad.

All of those things are wrong at least some of the time, based on any actual objective look at economic history.

Upvote for well-read supervillain hand-puppets, but is that really an Oedipal moment? IIRC, Oedipus stabbed his eyes out after he learned he had unknowingly had sex with his mother and killed his father. So the similarity here is that someone took their eyes out? Sounds flimsy.