LOL I'm so glad this was sped up. I think at 1x I'd have had to kill myself. Or her. Come to think of it, that would work better.

That ride could be so much worse. Those large arms were moving really slowly. Imagine if they sped up and went in different directions at the same time. Carnage. Still, there is no way I'd go near it.

I'm not "dismissing" it, I'm just calling it what it is. If someone tries to sell you a pile of dogshit by calling it cotton candy most likely you won't buy it. Because you know it's just a pile of dogshit, not cotton candy.Different representations of reality are called different names for a reason. Because they are different. Animation is animation, not time lapse. That's all I'm saying.>> ^poolcleaner:

>> ^Opus_Moderandi:
Seems legit.
When I hear the term "time lapse", I think of something recorded in real time that is sped up because, in reality, the actual event is very slow. Not something generated by a computer. An animation of anything is just that, an animation. imo....>> ^Sagemind:
Now, that would depend if this animation was an approximation or based on stats taken from actual sensors placed in the water to record water flow speeds. So... An animation of a time lapse maybe...?
>> ^Opus_Moderandi:
Isn't this actually animation? Not "time lapse"?



Well, if you think about it, it's all just representations of reality, whether it's an CGI animation made up of calculated data or the actual snap shots played continuously as an animated sequence of stills. (Also, consider other "videos" or images of phenomena in outerspace: black holes or so-called dark matter. We have to recreate images and video based upon various different observations. So I think while, yes, it is animation, you're losing out on the grandeur of the video by dismissing it as "animation".

>> ^Opus_Moderandi:

Seems legit.
When I hear the term "time lapse", I think of something recorded in real time that is sped up because, in reality, the actual event is very slow. Not something generated by a computer. An animation of anything is just that, an animation. imo....>> ^Sagemind:
Now, that would depend if this animation was an approximation or based on stats taken from actual sensors placed in the water to record water flow speeds. So... An animation of a time lapse maybe...?
>> ^Opus_Moderandi:
Isn't this actually animation? Not "time lapse"?




Well, if you think about it, it's all just representations of reality, whether it's an CGI animation made up of calculated data or the actual snap shots played continuously as an animated sequence of stills. (Also, consider other "videos" or images of phenomena in outerspace: black holes or so-called dark matter. We have to recreate images and video based upon various different observations. So I think while, yes, it is animation, you're losing out on the grandeur of the video by dismissing it as "animation".

Seems legit.
When I hear the term "time lapse", I think of something recorded in real time that is sped up because, in reality, the actual event is very slow. Not something generated by a computer. An animation of anything is just that, an animation. imo....>> ^Sagemind:

Now, that would depend if this animation was an approximation or based on stats taken from actual sensors placed in the water to record water flow speeds. So... An animation of a time lapse maybe...?
>> ^Opus_Moderandi:
Isn't this actually animation? Not "time lapse"?

I find it slightly annoying when clips are all obviously slightly sped up, increasing the pitch of the audio to a noticeably, annoyingly inaccurate high.

That's incredible. Would it look like that to the naked eye (obviously, it's sped up, but you know...)?

This is fun. As a side note, anyone else notice how the video's sped up to make his spins look faster? If you watch the cars as he's spinning, they all jump during each spin.

Not that that really detracts or anything... on the other hand it probably wasn't necessary.

His hand are moving so fast it looks like the video is actually sped up. Nice!


Also, we need less dipshit saying random shit on the microphone in the background TYVM.

>> ^karaidl:

This is what we should all say to vegetarians. Humans shouldn't eat meat?? Plants eat meat!!
Quick questions - Was this in slow motion? If so, I would have liked to see it sped up.


Not slow-mo at all. I have one of these, and the sequence you witnessed typically takes anywhere from 30 minutes to 4 hours depending on the size of the prey.

>> ^Boise_Lib:

>> ^Shepppard:
I absolutely adore this man.
💯0:2:1">💯0:2:1">💯0:2:1">http://tubedubber.com/#0fk-1P3Oa_M:-BjVtH5sy7A:0💯0:2:1
The original unfortunately was taken down ages ago for copyright blah blah blah.
Through tubedubber, you can finally see the original again without it being sped up, flipped, or slowed down. Huzzah!

Super Cool! Is tubedubber embeddable? I don't see it available.


Nope, or else I'd have that back on here in a heartbeat.

but, at least it's able to be viewed again.

>> ^Shepppard:

I absolutely adore this man.
💯0:2:1">💯0:2:1">http://tubedubber.com/#0fk-1P3Oa_M:-BjVtH5sy7A:0💯0:2:1
The original unfortunately was taken down ages ago for copyright blah blah blah.
Through tubedubber, you can finally see the original again without it being sped up, flipped, or slowed down. Huzzah!


Super Cool! Is tubedubber embeddable? I don't see it available.

I absolutely adore this man.

💯0:2:1">http://tubedubber.com/#0fk-1P3Oa_M:-BjVtH5sy7A:0💯0:2:1

The original unfortunately was taken down ages ago for copyright blah blah blah.

Through tubedubber, you can finally see the original again without it being sped up, flipped, or slowed down. Huzzah!

This really didn't need to be sped up.

I love his sound effects! They sound as if he is describing in detail exactly how to do what he is doing but it is sped up extremely fast because he is doing it extremely fast. lol