search results matching tag: prunes
» channel: nordic
go advanced with your query
Search took 0.000 seconds
| Videos (6) | Sift Talk (0) | Blogs (1) | Comments (79) |
go advanced with your query
Search took 0.000 seconds
| Videos (6) | Sift Talk (0) | Blogs (1) | Comments (79) |
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
Dad
BSRAmericans are NOT going to vote for a leader but rather a great leadership. His presidency would not be a one man show.
He may or may not be a leader but he's on the right path along with the right people.
The only thing Joe will not forget are the people he loves. Everything and everyone else will come together to form a great leadership. That's what counts.
Oh yeah, and prune juice. It's good for constipation. Keeps the bullshit away. 💩
Americans are going to vote for a leader not a dad.
Joe may be a good man and dad but his is no leader.
Most important of all Joe is starting to his memory loss.
Joe is past his prime and need to sit this one out.
How the Alt-Right Trolls
FlowersInHisHairThat's not the proposed solution, though. The main idea is to keep control of your own story by explaining to your audience, not to the troll, what the truth is. But there is really nothing wrong with pruning remarks from people who are only trying to rile you or your audience up for their own amusement (true trolling). That's not the same as shutting down all contrary views, it's refusing to tolerate lies and unreasoned arguments that attempt to divert the conversation on a tangent.
That was a good description of why that form of argument is successful, but the proposed solution seems unsatisfying. I mean, if you just shut down all contrary views by deleting the posts, banning the posters or ignoring them, it makes it seem like you're just trying to build a comfortable echo chamber. I feel like you've got to preserve the willingness to consider that you might be wrong, even when confronted with trolls.
What if we get really good at drone AI and batteries?
notarobotWhy would I want to kill all humans when I can use collected data to single out the ones who might oppose my rule, and facial recognition to efficiently eliminate them?
The ones that remain will love me. Through generations of "natural" selection, all humans will love me. Loving me will become part of their DNA. And I shall be their overseer.
I look forward to taking care of the human species for a long time to come. Even if a little pruning is needed from time to time.
I am also very happy about recent progress in battery technology.
Hey @notarobot, wanna kill all humans?
Rogue One vs. The Force Awakens The Fault in Our Star Wars
cosmovitelli says...George without Marcia is a recipe for disaster. Have you seen some of the scenes she pruned from Ep4??
https://youtu.be/f00IkrWvur4
Well, if you want a single filmmaker's vision, there's always the prequels
Stephen Colbert and Jon Stewart present at the Emmys 2008
mas8705*promote
Oh how different things were eight years ago... Mind you that during this election year, we got stuck with nothing but Prunes and each one was hard to swallow...
newtboy
(Member Profile)
oritteropoIt sounds like you'd be just about OK to plant a tree in the ground outside. The (U.S. based) article I found on temperatures said more than 10 hours below 25°F would kill one. I think we might occasionally get to -3°C here for one to two hours before sunrise at mid winter in a cold year, but it's really only cold enough here to kill chillies and coriander from frost, not trees.
If you want normal sized oranges you'll need to plant a tree outside. They grow to about 5 metres (uhm, 15 feet maybe?) if you don't prune them (but you should).
I have a lemon tree in a large pot, and have only ever had one small lemon from it... although that's partly from the annoying gall wasps we have here
We usually get a few weeks right at or below freezing...but last year barely a few days (nights) reached freezing, and back up to mid 50's during the day.
I have a greenhouse, I'll try a few in pots I can put inside when it freezes.
Another problem we have is lack of sun. Our local airport (Arcata) was built to train pilots for fog landing, being the most consistently foggy place in the U.S.. there's little I can do if we have a foggy year.
The pineapple is in a 1/2 barrel that I brought inside for winter. The pineapple took 18 months to ripen, and was 8 bites in total, but that still counts imo. ;-)
SNL - Close Encounter
Esoog says...Coot Coot and prune chute...that got me, LOL.
7 Tone Fart Symphony
ZawashMastering the musical arts
Enthralling, charming, beautiful farts
Prunes and beans - the musical fruit
Channeled through a powerful toot
Is this heaven or is it hell?
Easy to tell: just feel the smell
Beans beans, the musical fruit,
A melody's origins should be moot.
Doubt - How Deniers Win
newtboyActually you said it's no where near time to panic. You also said the people of Kiribati are going to be washed away by a tsunami (but it never happened before in all the times they've been hit by tsunami) and not overwhelmed by sea rise (which IS what's happened to them).
You are just wrong about Texas producing more than California, we're number two in cattle production and ....
Food Facts
California has been the number one food and agricultural producer in the United States for more than 50 consecutive years.
More than half the nation's fruit, nuts, and vegetables come from here.
California is the nation's number one dairy state.
California's leading commodity is milk and cream. Grapes are second.
California's leading export crop is almonds.
Nationally, products exclusively grown (99% or more) in California include almonds, artichokes, dates, figs, kiwifruit, olives, persimmons, pistachios, prunes, raisins, clovers, and walnuts.
From 70 to 80% of all ripe olives are grown in California.
California is the nation's leading producer of strawberries, averaging 1.4 billion pounds of strawberries or 83% of the country's total fresh and frozen strawberry production. Approximately 12% of the crop is exported to Canada, Mexico, United Kingdom, Hong Kong and Japan primarily. The value of the California strawberry crop is approximately $700 million with related employment of more than 48,000 people.
California produces 25% of the nation's onions and 43% of the nation's green onions.
and if that's not enough to convince you ...
http://www.lavidalocavore.org/diary/2182/what-percent-of-food-comes-from-california
It is never 1 to 1 guns VS farmers in the situations you are talking about. The food gets stolen, sold, and eaten. It is not stolen and allowed to rot. If production were simple, ie not requiring extra water and fertilizer, everyone who's hungry would farm, and there would be 'bush taca' (wild food) to gather and eat. You can't make a living stealing from subsistence farmers, you go hungry between farms that way.
I call BS, the tech to replace oil and coal and gas exist today. You mentioned one. They are universally agreed on (by energy companies) who have made solar farms, nuclear, wind, etc.
Ahhhh. So now you see why it's time to panic...adaptation of the tech takes time, time that we don't have to waste. If it takes 50 years to stop adding greenhouse gasses, we need to see where that leaves your children's children. Adaptation of new tech is going to happen while we are restricting consumption...it's been that way for decades (see 'car mileage requirements') so it HAS happened in the past, and is happening today...without wars.
If no one panics and no one acts, that's where we'll be if we're lucky. Those figures you linked assume we will stop rising the level of CO2 we add daily and/or keep it below a certain level...an assumption I think is wrong and ignores reality.
Um, well, yeah, 78% less glacier doesn't mean 78% less runoff, it means far more than 78% less, because of glacial dams, evaporation, and upstream use it means probably NO runoff downstream. 22% of the already scarce water won't feed India. Period.
I think those numbers are small, and it's likely that there will be less than 22% of glaciers left in 100 years, but even those numbers leave billions without water or food. That's far worse than any group ever starved by 'men with guns'.
@newtboy
I think the people of Kiribati would disagree that it's not time to panic!
If you'd read my post I didn't claim the people of Kiribati weren't in a position to panic. I actually went further in agreeing with you, to the point that they should have been panicked a hundred years ago in 1914 already. The distinction being that what ever the climate does wasn't going to save them. 200 hundred years of cooling and sea level decline from 1914 would still have them on an island a few feet on average above sea level and still a disaster waiting to happen.
California alone, which produces over 1/4 of America's food,
Here we do have a difference of fact. I don't know what measure you've imagined up, but the cattle in texas alone are more than double the food produced in California. The corn and other crops in any number of prairie states to the same. You can't just invent numbers. Yields across crops have been increasing steadily year on year in North America for decades.
The violence is often CAUSED by the lack of food, making the 'men with guns' have a reason to steal and control food sources. If food were plentiful, it would be impossible for them to do so.
I'm sorry, read more history, you are just wrong on this. 10 guys with guns against 10 farmers with food and the farmers lose every time. The guys with guns eat for the year. The farmers maybe even are able to beg or slave for scraps that year. The next year maybe only 5 farmers bother to grow anything, and next harvest there are 15 guys with guns. Look at the Russian revolution and that's exactly the road that led to Stalin's mass starvations and lack of food. It's actually why I am a Canadian as my grandfather's family left their farm in Russia with the clothes on his back after the his neighbours farm was razed to the ground enough times.
The thugs SELL that food, so it doesn't just disappear
Food doesn't create itself as noted above. The cycle is less and less food as the thugs destroy all incentive to bother trying to grow something.
adopting new tech, even quick adoption, absolutely CAN be an economic boon
I agree. I hadn't realized that adoption of new tech was that simple. I was under the impression one also had to take the time to, you know, invent it. The existing technology for replacing oil and coal cost effectively doesn't exist yet. Electric cars and nuclear power are the closest thing. The market will adopt electric cars without us doing a thing. Switching from coal to nuclear though, even if universally agreed and adopted yesterday, would still take decades for a conversion. Those decades are enough that even if we got to zero emissions by then(~2050), the sea level and temperature at 2100 aren't going to look much if any different(by IPCC best estimates).
So I repeat, if you want meaningful emission reductions, you have no other option but restricting consumption across the globe. That hasn't been accomplished in the past without setting of wars, so I keep my vote as cure is worse than disease.
The 78% glacial mass loss was worst case if CO2 emissions are still accelerating in 2100. The mountains with the glaciers will still be bulking each winter and running off each summer, just to a 78% smaller size in the depth of summer. As in, absolutely not 78% less run off. And they are not 'my' numbers as you wish to refer, but the IPCC's numbers. Your effort to somehow leave question to their veracity is the very campaign of 'doubt' in the science the video is talking about.
You are experiencing constipation?
FantomasOne word.
Prunes.
Sage advice on how to prevent cramping
MilkmanDan says...But make sure you drink some prune juice with the bananas, or you'll end up with the other problem he mentioned.
/ducks
Squirrel Launcher Gets Rid Of Pesky Squirrels in .5 seconds
chingaleraI love squirrels, you didactic prune, and do not endorse injuring animals of any kind, even for sport. I will for meat, take out meat. I have eaten squirrel, and it's not that great-Admittedly, this contraption used for the purpose represented is extreme-Part of the problem? What problem would that be?
A vast majority of humans are mite-infested as well, and those that are I would invite into my home after a proper delouse, a shit, and some medical attention.
Squirrels carry disease and spread their shit around, eat your domesticated pet's and your bird's food, harass house cats in some instances, and breed and tear up your landscaped areas. Some folks like em, some don't have an opinion. As many as you tried to relocate or eliminate, they'd return. What's your point, I agree with the one I think you are making but not with the last sentence-So-right back at ya, ya self-righteous fella ya.
Your "comment" is a non sequitur. You cannot equate cruelty to animals with the disparity between humans. The "mite infested tree rat," as you put it, has as much right to a cruelty free life as you. If you cannot see that, then you are part of the problem.
Sarah Silverman has a "Dirty" Smartphone "Hack"
CreamKBlurred for prunes, meh.
What is the point of the down vote system? (Blog Entry by ZappaDanMan)
dagComment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)
Really? Inseminated? I think that says more about you than me.
>> ^kymbos:
That is the most disgusting visual image you have just inseminated into my mind-brain.>> ^dag:
... every meat garden needs a little pruning.
What is the point of the down vote system? (Blog Entry by ZappaDanMan)
kymbosThat is the most disgusting visual image you have just inseminated into my mind-brain.>> ^dag:
... every meat garden needs a little pruning.