*ban https://videosift.com/video/Kluna-Tik-NVA-Eating-a-SCORPION-Kluna-Tik-NVA-Dinner-24

The thumbnail image for this video has been updated - thumbnail added by oritteropo.

The thumbnail image for this video has been updated - thumbnail added by oritteropo.

The thumbnail image for this video has been updated - thumbnail added by oritteropo.

The thumbnail image for this video has been updated - thumbnail added by ReverendTed.

The thumbnail image for this video has been updated - thumbnail added by jonny.

The thumbnail image for this video has been updated - thumbnail added by eric3579.

The thumbnail image for this video has been updated - thumbnail added by vaporlock.

Thanks for the interview, it was a good one.

In reply to this comment by rottenseed:
I agree with all of you. I don't get how people think he's funny. If you want to actually here him normal, though. There is a good interview comedian Marc Maron does with him here. I actually backed off my disdain for him based on the interview.

I agree with all of you. I don't get how people think he's funny. If you want to actually here him normal, though. There is a good interview comedian Marc Maron does with him here. I actually backed off my disdain for him based on the interview.

Too funny! "Kill them dirty NVA gooks, Joe!"

And Hanoi Jane? Gimme a break, she's allowed to have her opinions. "You're with us or against us" is bullshit. NVA was not monsters anymore than US soldiers are. Oh noes, she's laughing with the enemy, bah. That war should never have happened anyway. (This is not against veterans, all respect to them, but the policies that dictated the war were foolish.)

The Bush Administration would like you to believe that talking to Iran, to Hamas, to Hezboallah or even to Al Qaeda is a form of weakness, a sign of defeat, that somehow by mere contact the effort is lost.

That is a fallacious lie. One keeps his friends close and his enemies closer. Enemy contact was maintain during the Cold War with Russia abating the Cuban Missile Crisis, during the Vietnam War with Kissinger trying to broker a peace deal with NVA and VC. Even now in Iraq the administration is talking to Sadr Army, The Bader Corps and the various Sheikh and tribals groups that form the fragile Awakening Council keeping peace in the Anbar province.

My belief is that the Bush Administration would like to keep it so because it makes escalation of hostilities so much easier. It's the stupidest fucking shit ever. Imagine if during the Cuban missile crisis, JFK just stopped talking to the Soviets. There would be no USSR, USA, Cuba or much of the world anymore.

>> ^quantumushroom:
"No end in sight - The futile war against Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan."
The best documentary of 1943.


If you are paying attention I think this is more accurate:

"No End in Sight - The Futile War against the Viet Cong and NVA"

I thought El Jefe was the only one deluded enough to compare the war in Iraq and WWII.

Great comment. Thank you.

In reply to this comment by Farhad2000:
The creation of an enemy is one of the topics covered in Loss of Innocence, a documentary about the seductive appeal of War to man.

The basic argument is that the creation of an enemy is necessary for successful psychological push to convince a population that a war is beyond all means necessary. The historical record with regards to this idea is filled with evidence, consider World War 2.

Prior to Pearl Harbor, the US population did not want to engage with any war with either the 3rd Reich or Imperialist Japan. However the attack on Pearl Harbor solidified the case for war instantly, nearly a million Americans signed up, internment camps were created. Propaganda posters from the time show the Japanese as beastly beings, with slit eyes, yellow skin, fangs and claws. The enemy is dehumanized and generalized, even though in reality hegemony is never achieved, however there is a need to inherently dissolve their individuality to make them our enemies. The word 'Jap' became a derogatory term, in fact vocabulary is key in dehumanization of an enemy.

Vietnam followed the same path, with the Gulf Of Tonkin incident that made it seem like the NVA attacked US ships even though this was proven false. Vietnamese were portrayed as red communists, part of a larger threat embodied by Red China and the USSR based around the Domino theory. The words from that time - 'Gook', 'Victor Charlie', 'VC' and so on.

Iraq, Gulf War 1, the main drive for war publicly was the false testimony of Kuwait Embassy, the daughter of the ambassador was couched by a PR firm to relate a story of Iraqi troops pulling infant babies out of incubators. The public support increased instantly for going to War. The words - 'Sand nigger', 'Towel head', 'Hajji' most repeated now in the current war.

What is fascinating to me is that the enemy creation is necessary for violent acts of war, the same time it's seductive, its easy to psychologically develop an us vs them stand point, its simple. They are all guilty, they are all the enemy, so they must all perish so we can develop a better life for ourselves. But how do you tell a terrorist from a civilian? How do you not lash out at civilians who support the insurgents? Just like US troops lashed out at civilians in Vietnam because they knew or believed they helped the VC and NVA? When getting shot on a day to day basis by an unseen enemy, how does one not give into the urge to lash out against the civilians who you see everyday, there is a man there is his early 20s, he looks fiercely at your OP, his hands formed into tight fists, eyes like bullets. He bends down to pick something up, is it a stick? is it an RPG? Do I aim and pull the trigger?

To end evil we must commit great evil in kind, but we risking becoming evil ourselves for when we stare into the abyss the abyss stares back at us.