NPH has the remedy to this in his tweet.

"That Kirk Cameron is Hilarious"

This is how I like to react to crazy.

>> ^Peroxide:

@bcglorf,
Again, I read your whole argument, I read the conclusions of the paper you posted, neither of them show that current climate changes are not anthropogenic.
Again, your argument that the current changes are not anthropogenic hinges on the ammount of water in the atmosphere. Scientists have addressed this in multiple studies. Also, it makes no sense that water is the current culprit as it has always been in the atmosphere in varying quantities within a certain range, and could only change if another forcing agent caused more energy to be trapped in the atmosphere, essentially it is a positive feedback, but not the driver.
It's co2 emissions, check back with me in 10 years.
http://www.andywightman.com/docs/metoffice_climatepaper.pdf
http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/abs/10.1175/JCLI3966.1
http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/abs/10.1175/152
0-0442%282004%29017%3C3721%3ACONAAF%3E2.0.CO%3B2
http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?2000ESASP.463..201T&data_type=PDF_HIGH&whole_paper=YES&type
=PRINTER&filetype=.pdf
http://skepticalscience.com/gillett-estimate-human-and-natur
al-global-warming.html
http://www.skepticalscience.com/huber-and-knutti-quantif
y-man-made-global-warming.html
http://www.skepticalscience.com/lean-and-rind-e
stimate-man-made-and-natural-global-warming.html


Wow.

I'll try and use fewer sentences to summarize myself so maybe you'll bother reading it.

Scientific studies on causes and sources for current warming have relatively low confidence levels, largely because there are so many unknowns left to account for.

You can stop reading right there if you wish, everything else I have said is just demonstrating that fact.

I am not making any declarative statements about why warming is happening. If anything I've posted suggests that please let me know and I'll try to clarify.

Take a closer look at your own links, I have. The papers on causes of climate change are all based upon computer run climate models. Computer models are only as good as our understanding of a system and the data we have about the system to compare our models against(fact).

The scientific papers in your own links that you provided agree with me that there is a lack of quality long term data.

The scientific papers in your own links that you provided agree with me that our understanding of climate forcings and feedbacks is far from complete(even whether H2O is positive or negative).

@bcglorf,

Again, I read your whole argument, I read the conclusions of the paper you posted, neither of them show that current climate changes are not anthropogenic.

Again, your argument that the current changes are not anthropogenic hinges on the ammount of water in the atmosphere. Scientists have addressed this in multiple studies. Also, it makes no sense that water is the current culprit as it has always been in the atmosphere in varying quantities within a certain range, and could only change if another forcing agent caused more energy to be trapped in the atmosphere, essentially it is a positive feedback, but not the driver.

It's co2 emissions, check back with me in 10 years.

http://www.andywightman.com/docs/metoffice_climatepaper.pdf

http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/abs/10.1175/JCLI3966.1

http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/abs/10.1175/1520-0442%282004%29017%3C3721%3ACONAAF%3E2.0.CO%3B2

http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?2000ESASP.463..201T&data_type=PDF_HIGH&whole_paper=YES&type=PRINTER&filetype=.pdf

http://skepticalscience.com/gillett-estimate-human-and-natural-global-warming.html

http://www.skepticalscience.com/huber-and-knutti-quantify-man-made-global-warming.html

http://www.skepticalscience.com/lean-and-rind-estimate-man-made-and-natural-global-warming.html

I felt bad for Drew. Relieved he was okay -- that could have been brutal on his back.

NPH controlled the whole thing -- he is a master at physical comedy.

>> ^JiggaJonson:

Meh, it's got some comedic value but it's kind of obnoxious too. I actually felt bad for NPH.

Meh, it's got some comedic value but it's kind of obnoxious too. I actually felt bad for NPH.

Wait, isn't that NPH's father? He's put on weight. And lost height. Gained hair colour too, but lost age. He's like a whole other person!

Gay, straight... I think we ALL enjoy seeing NPH getting humped.

*promote

Even though he is gay, I enjoy seeing NPH getting hetero-humped.

I saw this stuff on Mythbusters. I'd like to get a canister and tell my friends it's helium.

NPH is funny as hell.

Agreed. It's a joke. Maybe he should apologize to Ted Levine, too. The guy REALLY sounds like that.

>> ^Boise_Lib:

>> ^Esoog:
>> ^Boise_Lib:
NPH had to apologize for saying, "I've never sounded more like a tranny in my life."

He shouldnt have to apologize for something so funny.

Agreed.

>> ^Esoog:

>> ^Boise_Lib:
NPH had to apologize for saying, "I've never sounded more like a tranny in my life."

He shouldnt have to apologize for something so funny.


Agreed.

>> ^Boise_Lib:

NPH had to apologize for saying, "I've never sounded more like a tranny in my life."


He shouldnt have to apologize for something so funny.

NPH had to apologize for saying, "I've never sounded more like a tranny in my life."

NPH = singwin
Jackman = dancewin

NPH is the power of meme's distilled into human form.