shagen. That was a good 'un.

In reply to this comment by shagen454:
I love how right wing & right-wing centrist (democrats) nutjobs like to say Michael Moore made millions. Yes, yes he did... but he was lucky and he would have kept on doing what he was doing if he were getting a 30k salary. I'm sorry to point out to you uber greedy capitalist fucks that most people do not become a fucking documentary film maker to make lucrative benefits.

I love how right wing & right-wing centrist (democrats) nutjobs like to say Michael Moore made millions. Yes, yes he did... but he was lucky and he would have kept on doing what he was doing if he were getting a 30k salary. I'm sorry to point out to you uber greedy capitalist fucks that most people do not become a fucking documentary film maker to make lucrative benefits.

and fixed.>> ^jimnms:

>> ^Trancecoach:
It's not dead. The embedding is disabled. Watch it on youtube.
>> ^alien_concept:
dead


A disabled embed is still dead.

Ok, then.. I will need to call dead on a few other videos whose embeds were disabled...

>> ^jimnms:

>> ^Trancecoach:
It's not dead. The embedding is disabled. Watch it on youtube.
>> ^alien_concept:
dead


A disabled embed is still dead.

>> ^Trancecoach:

It's not dead. The embedding is disabled. Watch it on youtube.
>> ^alien_concept:
dead



A disabled embed is still *dead.

This video would be fantastic without michael moore's arrogant, narcissistic, snorting laughter. He is an embarrassment to America. I loathe him!

It's not dead. The embedding is disabled. Watch it on youtube.

>> ^alien_concept:

dead

Your video, Michael Moore and Keith Olbermann on the Wall Street Protest, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

>> ^aurens:

I suspect you realize that your post is wildly speculative. I'd rather not spend too long on this, but I'll humor you and point out a few of the fallacies in your imaginative dystopia. In general, though, you seem to be confusing small government and a lack of regulation for lawless amorality. In any event, here we go:

1. "As there will be no more anti-trust laws in the free market, companies will merge until mega-cons rule a specific field of commerce."
If you think antitrust laws are an undying force of good, read this. (Also, don't confuse free-market capitalism with corporatism.)

2. "People can get fired on a whim without regulations."
Too absurd to even address.

3. "People spend their money on the expensive food (no subsidies)."
You're right. Government subsidies on food have been enormously successful in the United States.

4. "Healtcareproviders will be either expensive or underfunded."
Read pages three and four (or the whole thing, for that matter): http://mises.org/journals/fm/june10.pdf.
>> ^DerHasisttot:
Dystopian? Can't happen? Tell me why. Tell me why any of the things would not be as described without regulations and subsidies and social welfare. I await your response.



Of course the post is highly speculative: It says that RP gets elected. I thought this would be obvious.

1. The question would be: What would happen if Antitrust-laws exist no more at all, not: Are Anti-trust laws at the moment used fairly?


2. Either you adress it or you don't. It is not absurd. Tell me why it would be.


3. Again, the inferred question is not: Does it work now?; the question at hand is: What would happen if the farm subsidies in a first-world-country would fall away? Would farming become too unprofittable and only be used for subsistence; importing cheaper food from outside the US? Or would it become profittable again by increasing the price of food immensely, cutting heavily into the income of poorer people?


4. That text says on the first page (paraphrased): "46 million USAsians have no health insurance: Not a problem: 40 percent of those are young, 20% are wealthy." Yes, fuck the poor and the young, they don't need health insurance. Give me a serious unbiased text on this, and I'll read it. I really will. But to dismiss at least 40% of the uninsured right out of hand is highly irresponisble and assholish.

I suspect you realize that your post is wildly speculative. I'd rather not spend too long on this, but I'll humor you and point out a few of the fallacies in your imaginative dystopia. In general, though, you seem to be confusing small government and a lack of regulation for lawless amorality. In any event, here we go:


1. "As there will be no more anti-trust laws in the free market, companies will merge until mega-cons rule a specific field of commerce."

If you think antitrust laws are an undying force of good, read this. (Also, don't confuse free-market capitalism with corporatism.)


2. "People can get fired on a whim without regulations."

Too absurd to even address.


3. "People spend their money on the expensive food (no subsidies)."

You're right. Government subsidies on food have been enormously successful in the United States.


4. "Healtcareproviders will be either expensive or underfunded."

Read pages three and four (or the whole thing, for that matter): http://mises.org/journals/fm/june10.pdf.
>> ^DerHasisttot:
Dystopian? Can't happen? Tell me why. Tell me why any of the things would not be as described without regulations and subsidies and social welfare. I await your response.

His response is from an interview with Michael Moore in Bowling for Columbine.

http://videosift.com/video/Marilyn-Manson-in-Bowling-for-Columbine

Diabetes will kill us more likely.

>> ^EvilDeathBee:

>> ^chilaxe:
@EvilDeathBee
Once your diet and lifestyle give you cancer, we'll be sure not to mourn your droll first world tragedy.

When shall I be expecting this horrible pseudo-blueberry cancer that, judging from the seriousness of this video and it's length, and the amount of times he repeats the same shit, MUST be the main cause of death upon the middle class in America?
If only I read the contents of the packaging and not eat that gross american shit that's pure sugar, oh and of course the cancer causing non-blueberries! Someone call Michael Moore! It's too late for me, but maybe others can be saved!

I was interested at the beginning of the video to see how a religious kid would document and analyse the exodus (ha ha!) of youth from his church. I was even ready to jump in with something witty about using the interview backdrops from the "The Secret" DVD. But by the end of the video it was clear that this was a film maker following the Michael Moore tradition of deciding beforehand what the conclusion to be drawn was going to be, and it's about something I have absolutely no interest in: whether there's any scriptural basis for something or other that some people in the Church think is a problem for the Church.

Scripture is poppycock, and anyone who tries to find basis for anything in it is boring to me. I also don't care about "the American Church" and its rubber walls. So I gave it a pass.>> ^Sagemind:

Funny - I actually expected a lot more - in the way of comments on this one...

LOL++>> ^MarineGunrock:

Lol sometimes I wish I were gay so I could go tongue-fuck some other dude's face in front of those crazy bastards. Then I'd hit on em. End goal? I want them to punch me. They won't though. That's their modus operandi. They want someone to hurt them so they can sue. Buncha bitches.