Jonathan Ross. He and Gervais are buddies, funnily enough. Gervais is on his show like every 3 weeks or something.

>> ^Abel_Prisc:
Weird, never seen Jimmy Carr out of character.


http://www.videosift.com/video/Fans-Support-Comedian-Jimmy-Carr-Over-Troop-Joke

I can't get over what a complete and utter twat Jonathan Ross is in every single interview. Tarantino's ego is completely deserved. Ross has nothing to offer except misjudged interruptions and foppish hair.

Daniel Radcliffe has grown up to be a really cool and amusing fella. An interview on Jonathan Ross I saw a few weeks back, he can hold his own and then some

http://www.videosift.com/video/Amusing-Mitchell-Webb-Interview-on-Jonathan-Ross Excellence.

Successfully processed your "amazon" invocation - view all Amazonized posts here

>> ^grinter:
I can't find a thing wrong with this performance.


me too.

but the reaction of the host was great nonetheless.

Thanks very much dd Not sure why it's not doing too well. I'm tempted to think it's that people don't like Ross, but i've sifted others where he's had far more to say for himself. Hmm...

In reply to this comment by deputydog:
just went to sift this myself.

if only all interviews were as decent as this one.

*promote

It'd be better if he had brought in one of those snakes and it had purposefully bit Bono in the eye

In reply to this comment by bluecliff:
it would be nice if he had brought one of those snake and it accidentally bit Bono in the eyes.

He is goddamnit! Are you female? If so come back to me and i'll argue it with you, if not, how would you understand

OK maybe you're gay... Anyway, either way there's something about him

In reply to this comment by sillma:
Sexy? you're weird

here's the phonecall that started the whole affair...

http://www.videosift.com/video/Phonecall-that-got-Jonathan-Ross-Russell-Brand-suspended

>> ^Throbbin:
Was this funny?


Very much so!

Schumi, Schumi, Schumi....I know I'm hogging the posts here, but grant me just one thing extra I have to add. You said the following in a previous post for this video:

>> ^schumi_4_ever:
'BisHOp69, it amuses me that you would go on a rant against the spelling ability of someone who's commenting on a video. The point of commenting on a video is to voice the opinions of what one thinks about the video, the manner in which this is done is hardly of any significance.'

This in itself is a valid point as it expresses your opinion....only thing is, 2 weeks ago you this was part of the description on Colin Farrell/Jonathan Ross interview video posted by alien_concept:

>> ^alien_concept:
'I always thought that Colin Farell was an arrogant dickhead and this interview couldn't of proved me more wrong'

and to this you then replied:

>> ^schumi_4_ever:
'couldn't have. Couldn't Have. COULDN'T HAVE. COULDN'T....HAVE. HAVE. HAVE. HAVE. COULDN'T HAVE. FOR FU*KS SAKE. COULDN'T HAVE.

SHOULDN'T HAVE.

WOULDN'T HAVE.

COULDN'T HAVE.

GODDIT? Good.'

And of course, adding later:

>> ^schumi_4_ever:
'no, the reason why i wrote what i did is because its not even a case of bad grammar, otherwise i'd bother writing full sentences with puncutation. The amount of people saying 'of' instead of 'and' because when they talk they say 'couldn't of' (i dont) is shocking.
im not having a go at the fact that its grammatically wrong, im having a go at the retardedness of it. it harks the downfall of society.'

SO!!!.....I thought you seem to think that the manner in which you voice an opinion is 'hardly of any significance'. But you then tell poor alien_concept he is bringing about the end of civilization by doing exactly that? Mistaking 'couldn't of' with 'couldn't have'. I mean, I could still read and understand it. Where's the problem, eh schumi??? Or am I dealing with 2 different schumis here? Do you perhaps suffer from Dissociative Identity Disorder??? And if you are any of shumis other persons, WELCOME TO VIDEOSIFT!

Thanks for all the help. It's now re-sifted.

http://www.videosift.com/video/Sarah-Michelle-Gellar-Jonathan-Ross-resubmission

>> ^Sarzy:
This particular video host has a tendency to display an ad and resize your window when you try to play a video. That's super annoying. Perhaps we should block this host from being posted. Is that possible? discuss


That WAS REALLY annoying...yup

I don't like that one bit - Video is awesome Thylan - but the player should burn in hell - an ad - thats ok - resize my window?? no thanks

I am watching clip - I will upvote the clip once its returned