I met him in a swamp down in Dagobah
Where it bubbles all the time like a giant carbonated soda
S-O-D-A, soda

I saw the little runt sitting there on a log
I asked him his name and in a raspy voice he said "Yoda"
Y-O-D-A, Yoda
Yo-yo-yo-yo Yoda

Well, I've been around, but I ain't never seen
A guy who looks like a muppet, but he's wrinkled and green
Oh, my Yoda
Yo-yo-yo-yo Yoda

Well, I'm not dumb, but I can't understand
How he can lift me in the air just by raising his hand
Oh, my Yoda
Yo-yo-yo-yo Yoda
Yo-yo-yo-yo Yoda

Well, I left home just a week before
And I've never ever been a Jedi before
But Obi Wan, he set me straight, of course
He said, "Go to Yoda and he'll show you the Force"

Well I'm not the kind that would argue with Ben
So it looks like I'm gonna start all over again
With my Yoda
Yo-yo-yo-yo Yoda
Yo-yo-yo-yo Yoda

Yoda
Yo-yo-yo-yo Yoda
Yo-yo-yo-yo Yoda

So I used the Force
I picked up a box
I lifted some rocks
While I stood on my head
But, I won't forget what Yoda said

He said, "Luke, stay away from the darker side
And if you start to go astray, let the Force be your guide"
Oh, my Yoda
Yo-yo-yo-yo Yoda

"I know Darth Vader's really got you annoyed
But remember, if you kill him, then you'll be unemployed"
Oh, my Yoda
Yo-yo-yo-yo Yoda

Well, I heard my friends really got in a mess
So I'm gonna have to leave Yoda I guess
But I know that I'll be coming back some day
I'll be playing this part 'till I'm old and gray

The long-term contract I had to sign
Says I'll be making these movies till the end of time
Oh with my Yoda
Yo-yo-yo-yo Yoda Yo-yo-yo-yo Yoda

Yoda Yo-yo-yo-yo Yoda Yo-yo-yo-yo Yoda
Yoda Yo-yo-yo-yo Yoda Yo-yo-yo-yo Yoda

Yoda Yo-yo-yo-yo Yoda Yo-yo-yo-yo Yoda
Yoda Yo-yo-yo-yo Yoda Yo-yo-yo-yo Yoda

Yoda Yo-yo-yo-yo Yoda Yo-yo-yo-yo Yoda
Yoda Yo-yo-yo-yo Yoda Yo-yo-yo-yo Yoda

*dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/Angry-Birds-in-Real-Life-Aggressive-Goose-Attacks-Man

And just for fun, also check out: http://videosift.com/video/Jedi-Vs-Goose

Sending this video to Beggar's Canyon to plea for a little attention - beg requested by original submitter ex-jedi.

Moving this video to ex-jedi's personal queue. It failed to receive enough votes to get sifted up to the front page within 2 days.

I'll field this. Dark Knight rises came on the tails of the two best comic book movies for one of the best comic book characters ever made. Batman Begins was amazing when you compare it to Batman movies of old and then Dark Knight was probably the greatest action movie ever made, it was incredible.

The bar was raised super high, and people had a problem with the last movie. I think it honestly wasn't tight enough...Dark Knight is tight as a drum, Rises simply isn't. It meanders, it's just unbelievable at times, it doesn't handle some of it's new characters well at all. Although there's moments in that movie that are great, I feel it's second half really failed.

What I can see is there was simply too much they wanted to do...so guess what cut it into two movies. One is Dark Knight Falls and then Dark Knight Rises. I would've loved it, hell Hobbit is suddenly 3 movies so don't tell me Nolan couldn't make this stuff into two, it would've ROCKED.

!SPOILERS!

The ending wasn't handled well either but the argument to change it is weird too. Some people say Alfred should see Batman and Catwoman and just smile, and we never see them. To me if Nolan did that it would've been hacky and exactly the same as the ending to Inception.

As a whole, this trilogy is better than the original Star Wars Trilogy, based on story and characters alone. It's MUCH better you don't know anything if you disagree. Also just like Return of the Jedi is a disappointment (More Ewoks MUST DIE!) so is Rises, yet I'll still watch it.

While they are reviving things can we have Dark Forces 4 or Jedi Knights 3 (whatever), Republic Commando 2 or failing that how about a new X-Wing game? Tie Fighter HD would do nicely. Get on it Disney.

I wonder if they shot Return of the Jedi today whether there would be GoPros on the speederbikes?

Sending this video to Beggar's Canyon to plea for a little attention - beg requested by original submitter ex-jedi.

Well, I guess you were serious...

>> ^renatojj:

>> ^ChaosEngine:
Good thing one individual doesn't have to pay the whole cost then.
How come? What if society around that person likes the law the way it is? Does this dissenting individual have Jedi cost-spreading powers I don't know about?

One person moving pays the cost themselves. The cost of changing legislation is borne by the legislating authority, i.e. ultimately by all the tax payers. So yeah, the cost is spread.

>> ^renatojj:

>> ^ChaosEngine:
Your cost argument is irrelevant. I'm pretty sure there was a large legal cost associated with civil rights. If it's the right thing to do, you pay the cost and move on.
What if the cause is wrong, what then? Should a local community pay the cost or an entire nation, which is more oppressive?
Cost is always irrelevant when you can impose it on others, then it becomes a question of morality, but I'm guessing that's not an issue for you.

I have no issue with arguing the relative merits of different causes. There are undoubtedly groups that believe government should pay for religious or race segregated schools, and I do not support them. But it is up to society as a whole and legislators in particular to make that choice. Once that is made, certain segments of the population do not get to ignore that.

>> ^renatojj:

>> ^ChaosEngine:
No. These things are not up for negotiation. You shouldn't have to move to have access to basic necessities. Forget the practicalities, why the hell should you be forced to leave your home (potentially your job, friends and family as well) because some idiot decides to enforce their backward world view?
I want the government to step in and slap down idiocy like this.
So... let me get this straight, you don't want people to be oppressed by a "backward world view"... what if your definition of "idiocy" and "access to basic necessities" are the "backward world view"??
You'd be the one oppressing people cracking down on what you consider idiocy, imposing costs on an entire country to provide access to what you consider basic necessities.
I guess oppression is wrong, unless ChaosEngine is calling the shots.


Ahh, our old friend, moral relativism. Sorry, but no. I've explained this before, but you don't just get to pick and choose what you are opposed to or support. You must justify that stance. I support women being able to access medical services. Now either you don't support that, or you're ok with someone else denying them access (which is actually worse, at least the others are willing to stand behind their idiocy).

>> ^ChaosEngine:

Good thing one individual doesn't have to pay the whole cost then.
How come? What if society around that person likes the law the way it is? Does this dissenting individual have Jedi cost-spreading powers I don't know about?
>> ^ChaosEngine:

Your cost argument is irrelevant. I'm pretty sure there was a large legal cost associated with civil rights. If it's the right thing to do, you pay the cost and move on.
What if the cause is wrong, what then? Should a local community pay the cost or an entire nation, which is more oppressive?

Cost is always irrelevant when you can impose it on others, then it becomes a question of morality, but I'm guessing that's not an issue for you.
>> ^ChaosEngine:

No. These things are not up for negotiation. You shouldn't have to move to have access to basic necessities. Forget the practicalities, why the hell should you be forced to leave your home (potentially your job, friends and family as well) because some idiot decides to enforce their backward world view?

I want the government to step in and slap down idiocy like this.
So... let me get this straight, you don't want people to be oppressed by a "backward world view"... what if your definition of "idiocy" and "access to basic necessities" are the "backward world view"??

You'd be the one oppressing people cracking down on what you consider idiocy, imposing costs on an entire country to provide access to what you consider basic necessities.

I guess oppression is wrong, unless ChaosEngine is calling the shots.

>> ^brycewi19:

>> ^ex-jedi:
I've got a bad feeling about this.

It's a trap.

Oh you finally figured THAT part out...

This series look interesting... I'll watch it as long as they keep it on a reasonable timeslot and not have it changed every 3-4 months.

>> ^ex-jedi:

I've got a bad feeling about this.


It's a trap.

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)

For He IS the Kwisatz Haderach




>> ^ex-jedi:

It is the legend!
>> ^dag:
Reminds me of the sand worms of Arakkis, only, you know, wetter.