search results matching tag: doing it wrong
» channel: nordic
go advanced with your query
Search took 0.008 seconds
Videos (75) | Sift Talk (9) | Blogs (10) | Comments (718) |
Videos (75) | Sift Talk (9) | Blogs (10) | Comments (718) |
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
Comcast Repairmen Unconcerned Of Wrecks They Are Causing
Everyone in this video is doing something wrong. Rather than picking a side to blame, why don't we judge the situation neutrally. I definitely blame the drivers because they're driving like assholes during poor weather conditions -- but that doesn't make Comcast employees who apathetically enforce safety protocols or a vigilante transit authority with a smartphone right either. Fails all around.
It's a Trap
Yeah, they're doing it wrong again. Something they did or just some nebulous culture shift around ~2000 or so seemed to actually work, and it takes about four or five years before you can know whether what you did worked or not. Prior to the 2000 thing, it was scare tactics, which don't work on invincible teenagers. Then they switched to a less dramatic "it's not a big deal, it's okay to chose not to smoke" approach, which I think was the good one.
The real problem (in the US at least) is the 17 and 18 year-old kids smoking, which means the 13-16 year-old kids do it to be like their older peers. If you can break that cycle, even just once, you come as close to solving the problem as you can. But, since there is this lag time between the beginning of the cycle and it coming full circle, the industry assumes it was the most recent ("evil tobacco corporations taking advantage of you") effort that was actually the effective one. I don't think it is. I especially don't think it will work on college-age demographic they're targeting. It's still "The Man" telling them what to do, even if it's a different hand of "The Man."
It Needs A Little More Time
You're doing it wrong, Brett, that's only for pasta.
How To Cook With Cast Iron
Ok...I have a hard time taking cooking tips from someone that leaves the tops on their carrots.
I know I do it wrong, but I scrub mine down with steel wool before cooking, to bare metal, then heat it with oil. Stuff doesn't stick, and my iron levels are nice and high.
Would you use time travel to kill baby Hitler?
2:28 - Telegraph operation, you're doing it wrong.
Humpback Whale breaches right next to swimmers
You're doing it wrong?
Although, now I think about it, why are the people so happy? When I do this in my truck with a puddle in front of a bus stop, people get pissed off.
Mekanikal (Member Profile)
It is but the embed on streamable doesn't work, or at least I'm doing it wrong.
I think you can sift it from here. I assume this is the leaked trailer.
https://streamable.com/23bv?t=29.0
Man Arrested & Punched for Sitting on Mom's Front Porch
Playing meek does not protect you from any abuse you've mentioned, including being shot to death. It doesn't keep one from being arrested, beaten, humiliated, having false charges levied, etc. It only perpetuates the idea that the police are 'just doing their job's' when they abuse citizens. Fight back. This guy played meek until an asshat illegally grabbed his phone, then attacked him, and remained meek afterwards. He could have destroyed that cop if he fought back....but would have probably been shot if he had exercised his right to self defense.
If you are black and armed and you get stopped, shoot first. Being armed is now considered a legitimate reason for police to kill you. You don't have to be threatening, pointing that gun, or doing anything wrong at all, just having it is 'reason' enough for them to shoot you dead today. Prison is better than dead, imo.
Cops have squandered the good will and trust granted them by the public. They no longer get the benefit of a doubt.
It's 25 times more likely a cop will murder you than the odds you might murder them, they are all armed and dangerous, and turnabout is fair play. In my opinion, citizens have more right to shoot cops in self defence than vice versa.
I agree with just about everything you said. Except...
This isn't a perfect world. You described this imperfect world. This guy should wait until all the corrections are made? Or does it make more sense to seethe silently and await for the humiliation to end NOW?
The situation with police departments getting training (and support for mentally ill people BEFORE they flip out) does need to be fixed.
Until it is, play meek. Unless you want to be arrested. Hit in the eye. Humiliated on your front lawn. What do you gain from fighting a losing battle IN THIS MOMENT?
I dare you not to find this mind-blowing!
Wearing Your Dead Girlfriend.
...you're doing it wrong.
Break Free from Your Scale
Wow....if that's better than sex to you, you are DEFINATELY doing it wrong....or, more likely, not at all.
Heinz Handjob
If the head of his penis is the open end of the bottle she's doing it wrong in more ways than one.
Spacex - Falcon 9 - Unplanned Rapid Disassembly
You're doing it wrong.
The fire is supposed to be on the bottom end, guys.
Try again.
Bill Maher: Julian Assange Interview
I think it is stupid to whine about the email leaks "unfairly" damaging Hillary's campaign.
The DNC could have easily avoided the fallout / resignations / etc. by simply not doing shady, underhanded shit. When you get caught with your hand in the cookie jar, don't bitch about who snitched on you -- a better response would be to learn that you can't get caught if you don't do anything wrong.
Sorta reminds me of earlier in the campaign when Hillary complained that it was unfair for people to want to see her transcripts of paid speeches given to Wall Street banks. She said that other candidates weren't expected to do that, so it was an unfair double standard. Bernie Sanders response was great -- he said he'd be 100% willing to hand over any of his transcripts, except for one minor problem: he never made any paid speeches to Wall Street banks.
With regards to Wikileaks, I have zero problems with how they handled things and don't care at all who their source was -- Russia, some other very biased source with a clear agenda to damage Hillary, whatever. The only thing that matters is, are the emails true / legit? I haven't heard anyone suggest that they aren't; just bitching about it being "unfair" that all the dirt is on Hillary and the DNC.
Wikileaks relies on sources. You know, leakers. I'm confident that if they had dirt on Trump or any other candidate, they'd put it out there. But Wikileaks can't make candidates or parties do questionable shit, and even when candidates or parties do do questionable shit, they still need someone to catch them and then leak the information to Wikileaks.
Sometimes, if they don't have any dirt on somebody, it might be because there isn't any dirt to be had... Just like Sanders' transcripts of Wall Street speeches.
Making A Pizza With A Hydraulic Press
You are doing it wrong
MMA Fighter KO's Opponent, Uses Pokeball On Him.
I'm pretty sure he's doing it wrong. That guy's manager should have thrown the Pokeball, and then stuffed his fighter and his newly captured fighter back into their pokeballs and put them in his briefcase or wherever he keeps them until the next event.
I'm also assuming he pays him, which also isn't correct.