Yeah predictable-as-rain-fucking-ever. Here's to the rat-patrol that voted-up this comment. An army of two, robots being robots.

You have been awarded 1 Power Point for fixing the embed code for Dead Pool video Zero Punctuation Review: Army of Two. Thank you for helping maintain VideoSift's reliability.

Your video, Two ant armies collide; death ensues., has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

The story sounds like a complete rehash of Army of Two 2 (which also sucked).

Your video, Zero Punctuation Review: Army of Two, has made it into your personal Highest Rated Videos listing. Congratulations on a job well done. For you contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

I should have phrased that differently. It's more like "I had fun shooting shit."
But the game is terrible because it's 1) VERY linear, 2) has NO story 3) weapons are LAME 4)play time is criminally short and a few other small nuances. I never said that my opinion was fact, though.

In reply to this comment by Napalm:
In reply to this comment by MarineGunrock:
>> ^Napalm:
Wrong.


Wow, that was such a mind-blowingly articulate argument you posted there! You sure took me down a peg! Remind me to never have a debate with you!

Well if you can state your highly subjective opinion as fact then I can too. I just did it with fewer words.

I'm just kind of baffled someone can call Gears of War a "monumental pile of shit" with a straight face. Especially considering you yourself actually admitted the game was fun.
I qoute: "Yes, it was a fun game, if you like the constant non-stop shoot-em up types. The cover system is awesome, though. The camera work in the game is superb, the graphics are great, and yet didn't tax my system at all. The sound was awesome and the combat was very different with the cover system. You will die if you don't use it."

So basically you are complaining about a high price and non stop action.
I still don't see how that makes this game so terrible.

In reply to this comment by MarineGunrock:
>> ^Napalm:
Wrong.


Wow, that was such a mind-blowingly articulate argument you posted there! You sure took me down a peg! Remind me to never have a debate with you!

Well if you can state your highly subjective opinion as fact then I can too. I just did it with fewer words.

I'm just kind of baffled someone can call Gears of War a "monumental pile of shit" with a straight face. Especially considering you yourself actually admitted the game was fun.
I qoute: "Yes, it was a fun game, if you like the constant non-stop shoot-em up types. The cover system is awesome, though. The camera work in the game is superb, the graphics are great, and yet didn't tax my system at all. The sound was awesome and the combat was very different with the cover system. You will die if you don't use it."

So basically you are complaining about a high price and non stop action.
I still don't see how that makes this game so terrible.

The videosift search failed to locate this video when I searched for "Army of two" or something like that (ironically it works now...).

Anyway, it didn't matter since it was already there, waiting for me. On the top 15.

*gay for the lulz?

>> ^Napalm:
Wrong.


Wow, that was such a mind-blowingly articulate argument you posted there! You sure took me down a peg! Remind me to never have a debate with you!

>> ^MarineGunrock:
Oh dear Lord, did I hate Gears of War.
I only wish he would tear that monumental pile of shit to shreds.


High five.

>> ^MarineGunrock:
Oh dear Lord, did I hate Gears of War.
I only wish he would tear that monumental pile of shit to shreds.


Wrong.