How has this only got eleven votes? It's beautiful.

Barseps was the tenth vote ... I made it eleven. Blast from the past

"Hey ladies, remember how good it felt down there when you were eleven?"

Thanks to internet porn, even your fucking grandmother trims the beaver hutch nowadays....Quite frankly, we miss the thigh furbies......can't stand stubble and ingrown hars down thars, OH, and tell me this ladies..

Does rendering your snatch hairless make that particular area of your anatomy more desirable or aid in her proper function? NO. Hairless beavers are tantamount to corsets and high heels-It's a discomfort endured, touted by horny douchebag males as a hip, new style. Not so thinly-veiled pedo-bear new rules....

Notwithstanding my personal tastes, some nappy dugouts are quite hard to regard with relish.....Maybe YOU should consider the laser, hon....

I think Day Eleven was my personal fav ... the things people do for YT

Youre not very safe from internal threats.
The last eleven and a half years have shown that more than ever.
I guess thats why you try so hard to find a new external threat, so people will ignore the internal ones.

I always imagined these rabid atheists to be all self-hatey anyhoo...Maybe that's the core trying to keep all that, inner-frustration with other types of maroons in-check....These two need a corner to stand on with bullhorns of atheist happiness turned-up to eleven on a Sunday morning in front of a Starbucks next to a Baptist church.

"The longest and most destructive party ever held is now into its fourth generation and still no one shows any signs of leaving. Somebody did once look at his watch, but that was eleven years ago, and there has been no follow up."

So did anyone complain about having 10 vids promoted on the front page? It certainly never bothered me.

Is this a fix for a problem that only dag and lucky had?

I'd like to hear if others were bothered by 10 or so promotes. Anybody?

As for how effective promotes are.... there was a vid in "featured" mode for ELEVEN HOURS and still hadn't gotten 10 votes.

As for wanting us to police it ourselves -- we have to click into the vid to see how long it had been there. We have to decide if 2 hours or 3 hours or 4 hours is enough. If we promote a vid, we have to worry if it will fall off in 5 minutes if someone else isn't being attentive or if it is a high traffic time and 5 people promote in quick succession.

I just don't see that the promote as it is currently designed is effective or workable or anything other than anxiety producing (for us badge whores and cheapskates who want our power points to have a return on our "investment".)

I love you guys, dag and lucky. I love the look of the site now (except PLEASE use black for text and get rid of/tone down the crosshatch background to the right -- there just isn't enough contrast. The sizing up helped, thanks for that.) I suspect that some of the design elements are necessitated by having to service mobile devices and regular computers, but I don't know enough to know if that is true or not.

Overall, the design is clean and pretty. There are pangs as certain things have gone away and some fumblings as we learn new things.

But I haven't seen a single positive comment about the way promotes are now working. As near as I can tell, there was a single goal -- keep the number down -- which is fine. I think the Sifters would be better served if:
1. the time limit was brought back
2. the promote area was treated like a pqueue, and if three were already there, no more could be added.
3. the old Promote presentation be brought back, so they looked like regular vids instead of like ads. (I did find myself squinting at them, with the eye slide that someone else commented on.)

So I asked a question way up in this post -- did anyone have a problem with 10 promoted vids on the front page? Any sifter?

Thanks for all the good work, guys. Really.

In reply to this comment by shagen454:
Whaddya mean? You think a bunch of rural terrorists with weapons from WWII took out two humongous buildings that each fell the exact same way? Not likely. But, I digress I don't really want to talk about nine eleven.


ehem nine eleven

Come on man, you're better than that.



So say the Government, namely Bush did do 9/11 to justify an attack on Iraq or Afganistan. Why make the terrorists be Saudis? They're one of our greatest allies in the reason. Fuck make them Iraqis, it just doesn't make any damn sense.

>> ^shagen454:

Whaddya mean? You think a bunch of rural terrorists with weapons from WWII took out two humongous buildings that each fell the exact same way? Not likely. But, I digress I don't really want to talk about nine eleven.

ehem nine eleven
Come on man, you're better than that.


You're derailing this shit, take it to PMs.

Whaddya mean? You think a bunch of rural terrorists with weapons from WWII took out two humongous buildings that each fell the exact same way? Not likely. But, I digress I don't really want to talk about nine eleven.


ehem nine eleven

Come on man, you're better than that.

>> ^shagen454:

ehem nine eleven


Come on man, you're better than that.

I just got done watching Better This World which was about an activist gone FBI informant that encouraged and trained a group of anarchists to go to the RNC and fuck shit up. Its crazy that the government really does create these situations *ehem nine eleven*

>> ^AeroMechanical:

The voting age should be lowered to six years-old, maybe put a ceiling at eleven years-old. Old enough to read, but young enough to still believe in sharing and being nice to people.


And Santa, Hogwarts, the Easter Bunny, the Great Pumpkin, and God. Gotta get to 'em before parents destroy some wonderful fantasies and instill/strengthen a horrible one. Churches would be made of giant candy canes and sugar cookies.