The History of VideoSift Part I

To commemorate the launch of VideoSift 5, I'm writing a series of blog posts covering the history of VideoSift. This is part I, but there is a prelude here.

I remember the first YouTube video that really hooked me. There’s a good chance it was the same one that got You- SNL’s Lazy Sunday. I saw it posted on Metafilter and then it was everywhere. Some think this single video was the cause of YouTube’s meteoric rise. At the beginning of 2006 though, the ecosystem for online video was still pretty scattered. Both Google Video and YouTube were gaining traction, but there were scores of other competitors trying to get on the new, no longer postage stamp sized Flash embedded video bandwagon.

I was an active member on Metafilter at that time and fell in love with the way a good web community works. I was impressed by the selflessness of the members and the civility and decorum of the comments. Most of all, I liked the fact that self-promotion was not allowed. This seemed the way to create content that did not turn into a spam fest. So much of the Internet is about “look at me”, it was nice to have a corner of the net that was “look at this great thing I found”.

The idea for doing a “Metafilter” type video site was bubbling around in my head in that little chiropractic office (see prelude). I wanted “VideoFilter.com”. I wanted it so bad that in some of the promotion emails that I sent out after launch, I mistakenly called VideoSift “VideoFilter” in the copy. I give MetaFilter and its founder Mathowie full-credit for the kernel of the Videosift community culture.

In trying to come up with a good name for my new idea – I remembered an article from Salon about the “naming industry”. All the good one word .com domains are gone. Consulting companies had emerged would take disparate words, put them together and register the .com domain. They were then sold for sometimes hundreds of thousands of dollars to big corporations looking to rebrand themselves. An example from the article is JamCracker.com.

I spent a lot of time in my head working through names. VideoJam, VideoCrack, MetaVideo – most of the choices were either taken, or kind of lame. I wanted a name with the word video in it, but that also said something about the community. “Meta” would have been a good prefix, because the idea was to take video from its original source and raise it to another level.

Because I was working for myself, I wasn’t leaving the house until 10:30 AM. I ate a leisurely breakfast with my kids. I was in the habit of making them pancakes. A particular recipe I liked called for sifting the flour before mixing in the other ingredients. We had a big rusty flour sifter. Sometimes there was crud in the flour, and it would be left on the wire mesh of the sifter, while the pristine flour was in a neat mound in the bowl. Eureka.

Even before I registered the domain name, I had been heavily modifying the open source content management system, Pligg, to fit my needs. Pligg is a CMS that originally tried to offer a UI similar to Digg – a link voting site that was huge at the time.


I seeded the site with as many good videos as I could find, and then made it public. Initially, the only promotion I did was to post it to the Metafilter Projects section and the Pligg forums. Straight-off the bat we started getting some good traffic. I attribute most of the initial success, again, to Metafilter. Metafilter Projects is a nice way to announce new web projects and Matthowie himself gave us a nod of approval on his blog.

To this day, I don't know why VideoSift really took off. It wasn't first to market - there was another video voting meta-site called VideoBomb (now defunct) that kicked off a week before us, and had lots of press attention. I was so pissed because even though I had been working on it for over a month, it made VideoSift look like an also-ran.

Some blogs were starting to link to VideoSift based on the positive reception on Metafilter. One of these blogs was a new "boingboing-esque" blog called "The itinerateSurfer" (now defunct). The proprietor was a young man known as "Sourbrew" on Metafilter. We exchanged emails and started Google chatting. I was happy to have someone to share my experience with. Someone who understood the language of page views and visits and launching a new web site.

After the initial buzz started to die down, I was worried that the momentum would end. I began to post more videos myself to make sure the content was fresh. There was no "hotness" algorithm on the front page- if a post got 3 votes it made it to the top of the front page. I also made a sockpuppet account so it didn't look like all the posts were from me. I can now exclusively reveal that my sockpuppet from those early weeks was @alowicious.

Sourbrew was based on the US East Coast. He helped to keep videos posted during prime time in the US while I was asleep in Australia. Traffic was getting lower and we started to wonder if VideoSift would have a future. As we were both active members on Metafilter, I asked Sourbrew to post VideoSift content to the Metafilter front page as if it was something he had just discovered. This is a clear violation of Metafilter rules as he was definitely involved in VideoSift by that time and it would be considered a self-post. Here is the post that kick-started VideoSift and set it on the road to become a growing, self-supporting community.

I realize this is hypocrisy. I run a community founded on the merits of no self-promotion, yet baked into our site's beginnings is an act of self-promotion and disregard for the rules of a similar community. I regret this. It's rubbed me like a piece of sand over the years. I also think there's a good chance the VideoSift might not have survived without that spark.

From that day forward, Sourbrew and I did not need to work on creating content. Instead we were admins and moderators. As VideoSift really started to take off, Sourbrew decided that he wanted to use his real name. He became known as James Roe.

Still to come:
  • Enter the Lucky760
  • VideoSift's Polish holiday
  • My meeting with the Reddit team in San Francisco
  • Michael Arrington makes a fool out of me
  • I throw an entire community under the bus

    dag says...

    Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)

    Maybe I'm going into more detail than necessary. But this place has been such a huge part of my life, I feel the need to get it all out there. It may take 10 parts.

    lucky760 says...

    Don't mind all the details, dag. The more you share, the better.

    I can't wait to read more. And I'm hoping "I throw an entire community under the bus" is not an event that has yet to transpire. That would be an M. Night Shyamalan twist ending of apocalyptic proportions. (Which makes me wonder if the Siftpocalypse will be part of your telling of Sift history.)

    *promote *frontpage

    Quadrophonic says...

    Thanks for all the details dag, I'm interested to read the rest. And don't blame yourself about the hipocracy of selfpromoting videosift in the early days. Reddit did the same thing, in the beginning the founders had dozens of fake accounts to post Links and voting them up, not only to fill content but also to shape the kind of content that would be posted. And I'm quite sure if they never had done that, reddit wouldn't have become what it is.

    To quote F.D.Roosevelt on this one "Rules are not necessarily sacred, principles are."

    dag says...

    Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)

    I did not know that about Reddit - and what a great quote!

    Quadrophonic said:

    Thanks for all the details dag, I'm interested to read the rest. And don't blame yourself about the hipocracy of selfpromoting videosift in the early days. Reddit did the same thing, in the beginning the founders had dozens of fake accounts to post Links and voting them up, not only to fill content but also to shape the kind of content that would be posted. And I'm quite sure if they never had done that, reddit wouldn't have become what it is.

    To quote F.D.Roosevelt on this one "Rules are not necessarily sacred, principles are."

    chingalera says...

    *quality

    I must have showed up here after about 4-6 months in (choggie)and I recall being scrutinized by a senior member(farhad2000) through e-mail as to my politics, spirituality, etc. Soon realizing my opinions on most pop-culture, spiritual/religious views, and (A)political sensibilities were center to right of most children here, I set out not for laud or praise from the developmentally-disabled, but for infamy whether I wanted it or not....and that by accident.

    Thank you all for your patience and willingness to grow together with folks much more talented and hipper than themselves, while maintaining a healthy sense of humor and hopefully, using that interaction to cultivate themselves.

    Thanks to all, we have gotten many years out of this cheap trolling motor purchased used with very few hours of previous operation by one owner.

    Taint says...

    Great to hear the back story.

    I remember my brother showing me this site at one point, and while I don't remember being instantly taken with it, but you chose your name well, and it stuck with me. I found myself visiting more and more. Now, rarely a day goes by where I don't browse through the sift just to see what's going on and whether there's a pop cultural meme of the moment that I wasn't aware of, a documentary I never heard of, or just the latest trailer to some movie that I wasn't aware they released yet.

    You've built a brilliant web site with a great community. I often end up enjoying the comment section more than the videos themselves. It's everything that's good about entertainment on the web, and took something groundbreaking and massive like the creation of Youtube and gave it focus and purpose showing us what's worth our attention without having to -sift- through the pure dregs.

    I continue to recommend it to anyone who will listen.

    Thanks Dag

    dag says...

    Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)

    Blues News is still a little bit later. I'm only up to the first couple of weeks after launch.

    ant said:

    Man, I have been on VS for six years. CRAZY! Didn't Blue's News help start VS up too? Or was that later?

    I remember VideoBomb. I was on it and even had moderator access, but it got too messy so I resigned fast.

    BTW, http://www.mdnhinc.com/contact?dom=videofilter.com ... It's for sale!

    bareboards2 says...

    This is hysterically funny. (Louis CK would not approve of my choice of words.)

    Six YEARS ago there was some minor self linking, and some folks want to ban the guy now?

    Good lord. Get some perspective maybe?

    verdana said:

    ..there's a good chance the VideoSift might not have survived without that spark.

    dag says...

    Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)

    It's a fair call. Metafilter takes their rules seriously as do we. If I need to take my lumps, so be it.

    bareboards2 said:

    This is hysterically funny. (Louis CK would not approve of my choice of words.)

    Six YEARS ago there was some minor self linking, and some folks want to ban the guy now?

    Good lord. Get some perspective maybe?

    oblio70 says...

    I seem to recall my intro through Blue's News (and pro'lly via Ant, as well), as I had been lurking there daily back then (since pre-2K). This was the early spring of 2006. I believe Ant may be correct, since many of their "video of the day" links would point here. It was the discourse (and "discourse", too, it seems) that kept me coming back, though I contribute not-so-much, and am still a gem-free runt.

    dag said:

    Quote hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)

    Blues News is still a little bit later. I'm only up to the first couple of weeks after launch.

    Send this Article to a Friend



    Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






    Your email has been sent successfully!

    Manage this Video in Your Playlists

    New Blog Posts from All Members