Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Check your email for a verification code and enter it below.Don't close this box or you must fill out this form again.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
newtboy
(Member Profile)
Sorry for the later reply, I never check my profile... I just thought you would want to reward these guys by giving them views, since you agree with the message they're trying to convey with the video? I mean... you seem to agree with the message they're trying to convey, ie calling attention to the implicit arrogance and privilege in many of charity-video, so it seemed it would be sensible to reward them, I thought.
Torn between supporting the message of this likely staged video, and... not giving views to the guy who created this video. Yes.
Hybrid
(Member Profile)
Hybrid, don't be ridiculous. It would be illegal for Sweden to extradite him to the US. It would be political suicide for any Swedish politician or authority to be anywhere near involved an extradition to a country that practices the death penalty. Barbarians.
(my bad for profile replying - I don't discuss much on the sift)
In reply to this comment by Hybrid:
I don't think anybody is in any doubt that that is just a way to get him extradited to the US easily. Once he's in Sweden, it's pretty much a done deal. It has always been assumed that the sexual assualt charges are fabricated, to simply get him on Swedish soil.
So basically, this is absolutely about the Wikileaks side of things.>> ^Fantomas:
@dag & @Hybrid, I'm sure you're enjoying the debate, but what is happening in the UK is not directly about Wikileaks but extradition to Sweden to answer sexual assault charges.