search results matching tag: timekeeper badge
» channel: weather
go advanced with your query
Search took 0.000 seconds
- 1
Videos (1) | Sift Talk (0) | Blogs (0) | Comments (8) |
- 1
Videos (1) | Sift Talk (0) | Blogs (0) | Comments (8) |
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
oritteropo (Member Profile)
Thanks for the info!
In reply to this comment by oritteropo:
From a comment search, you have 38 of them (including one that wasn't in the comment below) and zifnab (timekeeper lev 1) has 76 (he can't be far off lev 2 though). Although the exact number required isn't publicised, 221 will get you to lev 3.
>> ^lucky760:
More likely the latter. Don't give up now!
In reply to this comment by Norsuelefantti:
Hey Lucky, Siftbot is not acknowledging my repeated use of the length-command, and frankly I think a timekeeper-badge should have been well earned by now. Is there something a miss, or is the requirement for the badge simply outrageously high?
Norsuelefantti (Member Profile)
From a comment search, you have 38 of them (including one that wasn't in the comment below) and zifnab (timekeeper lev 1) has 76 (he can't be far off lev 2 though). Although the exact number required isn't publicised, 221 will get you to lev 3.
>> ^lucky760:
More likely the latter. Don't give up now!
In reply to this comment by Norsuelefantti:
Hey Lucky, Siftbot is not acknowledging my repeated use of the length-command, and frankly I think a timekeeper-badge should have been well earned by now. Is there something a miss, or is the requirement for the badge simply outrageously high?
Norsuelefantti (Member Profile)
More likely the latter. Don't give up now!
In reply to this comment by Norsuelefantti:
Hey Lucky, Siftbot is not acknowledging my repeated use of the *length-command, and frankly I think a timekeeper-badge should have been well earned by now. Is there something a miss, or is the requirement for the badge simply outrageously high?
lucky760 (Member Profile)
Hey Lucky, Siftbot is not acknowledging my repeated use of the *length-command, and frankly I think a timekeeper-badge should have been well earned by now. Is there something a miss, or is the requirement for the badge simply outrageously high?
The Clock Clock
@dystopianfuturetoday
Are you making an attempt to get all the badges? Your first timekeeper badge after all this time?
You go, guy!
The Clock Clock
The newest Level One Timekeeper Badge goes to--
@critical_d
The Clock Clock
Tags for this video have been changed from 'self, referential, clock, clock, analog, digital' to 'self referential clock, timekeeper badge, congratulations' - edited by bareboards2
Issykitty (Member Profile)
Actually I don't have the Timekeeper badge yet. I've been studiously avoiding the *length invocation in hopes that you bullies won't pick on me, but I'm still pretty anal when I see an untimed video. So do your worst, meanie.
An old home movie of me:
In reply to this comment by Issykitty:
You have every freaking badge in existence! NERDY NERD NERD NERD NERD NERD!!!!!!!!!!!!