search results matching tag: How A Watch Works
» channel: weather
go advanced with your query
Search took 0.005 seconds
- 1
Videos (3) | Sift Talk (0) | Blogs (1) | Comments (11) |
- 1
Videos (3) | Sift Talk (0) | Blogs (1) | Comments (11) |
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
crafting a grande sonnerie watch
It's a cool video, but they still haven't shown how exactly that watch works or what's so special about it other than it's special..
dan00108 (Member Profile)
Congratulations! Your video, How a quartz watch works, has reached the #1 spot in the current Top 15 New Videos listing. This is a very difficult thing to accomplish but you managed to pull it off. For your contribution you have been awarded 2 Power Points.
This achievement has earned you your "Golden One" Level 2 Badge!
dan00108 (Member Profile)
Your video, How a quartz watch works, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.
How a Watch Works (1949)
>> ^ant:
>> ^SlipperyPete:
dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/How-a-Watch-Works
But it's only 9:43 long. Look at mine!
Sorry dude - you're right. I duped another of the same vid a couple of days ago, and saw the intro of yours and assumed the same.
*notdupe
How a Watch Works (1949)
>> ^SlipperyPete:
dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/How-a-Watch-Works
But it's only 9:43 long. Look at mine!
How a Watch Works (1949)
*dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/How-a-Watch-Works
How a Watch Works (1949)
This video has been nominated as a duplicate of this video by SlipperyPete. If this nomination is seconded with *isdupe, the video will be killed and its votes transferred to the original.
God's Mechanics: The Religious Life of Techies
>> ^Crosswords:
Long lecture is long. Religion is a malleable idea because it does not require proof in the scientific sense to believe. You can mold it into any shape you want; sometimes it's molded to fit the world and sometimes a person's idea of the world is molded to fit the religion (which sometimes takes the form of out right denying scientific evidence).
The problem of why so many people think religion and science can't co-exist is because there is a very vocal and active religious populations that see science as an assault on their beliefs. They don't want to see religion as malleable, they want it to be TRUTH (as they express on the bumpers of their horseless carriages powered by internal combustion engines). We, us non-believers, see this and are offended, because after all we base our understanding of the world on observable and measurable phenomena, while all their 'facts' are based on things a bunch of drunk goat/sheep herders were going on about 2000+ years ago.
As an atheist I've often given the the existence of a god/s thought, my conclusion has been it doesn't matter what I think since its subject to change at whim. I'd be most likely to see God as the watchmaker, in which case I'm benefited more by figuring out how the watch works than wondering what the maker wanted. I outright reject the God as the psycho jealous controlling girlfriend/boyfriend. 'If you really loved me you'd kill your first born, OMG you were really going to do it? I was just testing you, I wouldn't really make you do that. Now go slaughter some sheep and goats for me. No seriously... do it.'
That's all fine and whatnot... the problem is, religion is constantly retreating, and science constantly advancing.
People are rationalizing more and more. Which is pretty stupid and pathetic.
Religious people, ignorants or not, absolutely refuse to face reality. We see it every single day.
Being religious is, in my opinion, being intellectually dishonest. For example... how can someone say he/she is a christian, and then rationalize their way out from believing in most of the stuff that comes in the bible? The bible is the foundation for their belief (or it should be), yet only a complete ignorant would believe in shit as stupid as the beginning of the universe and creation of men, as described in Genesis. Or the great flood and the Moses story. etc, etc. There are people like that of course, but I doubt that it is the majority.
People are retreating from religious belief (even if unaware) and into empirical knowledge ever more.
Yet, they still consider themselves religious, even if whatever it is they believe in, has absolutely no real relation with what their religion is supposed to be about.
IF science ever reaches a point, where it can be said, with absolute certainty that god is not real, there would still be idiots trying to argue against it.
Shit... look at the amount of morons trying to discredit Evolution.
To conclude, I DO think science and religion are incompatible. One searches for the absolute truth, including the origin of the universe, how we came to be, and all that, no matter how pleasant it is (or isn't), and the other is about defending a stand, even if proven wrong (although every once in a while, they have to take a step back and admit they are being assholes. Nowadays you have the pope saying evolution is real.Oh really??? Well, that's not what it says in your holy book, you might wanna check that).
An institution such as the Catholic Church wanting to be side-by-side with science, after its "awesome" track record in support of science and knowledge, makes me wanna puke in disgust.
God's Mechanics: The Religious Life of Techies
*Long lecture is long. Religion is a malleable idea because it does not require proof in the scientific sense to believe. You can mold it into any shape you want; sometimes it's molded to fit the world and sometimes a person's idea of the world is molded to fit the religion (which sometimes takes the form of out right denying scientific evidence).
The problem of why so many people think religion and science can't co-exist is because there is a very vocal and active religious populations that see science as an assault on their beliefs. They don't want to see religion as malleable, they want it to be TRUTH (as they express on the bumpers of their horseless carriages powered by internal combustion engines). We, us non-believers, see this and are offended, because after all we base our understanding of the world on observable and measurable phenomena, while all their 'facts' are based on things a bunch of drunk goat/sheep herders were going on about 2000+ years ago.
As an atheist I've often given the the existence of a god/s thought, my conclusion has been it doesn't matter what I think since its subject to change at whim. I'd be most likely to see God as the watchmaker, in which case I'm benefited more by figuring out how the watch works than wondering what the maker wanted. I outright reject the God as the psycho jealous controlling girlfriend/boyfriend. 'If you really loved me you'd kill your first born, OMG you were really going to do it? I was just testing you, I wouldn't really make you do that. Now go slaughter some sheep and goats for me. No seriously... do it.'
Time to semi-retire the email Verification code? (Sift Talk Post)
>> ^dag:
Good point. We'll add it to the list.
Here is a copy of that list:
-Record new rap album titled: "Dag's in da House"
-Develop device to hook laptop to steering wheel of a car.
-Pitch videosift reality TV series to network executives.
-Ask Toys R' Us to sell exclusive siftbot action figure with kung-fu grip.
-Flip through 1346 cable channels before realizing there is nothing worth watching.
-Work out a mathematical algorithm for 'Godwins law' using the letters H-I-T-L-E-R as variables.
-Semi-retire e-mail verification.
Three Week Kitchen Conversion in Three and a Half Minutes
Me? Yeah I love watching stuff get built too. It's so much better when you don't actually have to do it. I can watch work all day long.