He is an idiot... Really I don't need that 'tough cookie' (charming as always Bill)... to demonstrate it...

I've always loved how even after clearly being shown he's wrong... he just continues to batter the point... again... and again... like if i hit this square peg hard enough... and long enough.. it will infact go through that round hole...

mmmm.. that cookie tastes good!!!

I've said it before, and I will say it again, "He is an ass!"

Hacking Palin's email: felony.

Exposing Valerie Plame: no biggie.

Blowing off a congressional subpoena: no biggie.

Lying a country into war: no biggie.

Do we really think that this guy is going to get charged? I know exactly what I would do if I was going to hack palin's email, forge my mac address and connect to a random unsecured wireless network in a random residential neighborhood.

There are some dumb people out there, but I would hope whoever hacked her email is smart enough to take a couple basic precautions.

Oh, and the other thing, the FBI wouldn't do shit if someone posted my e-mails on the net.

I love her.

This guy does a good Colbert impression... really nails the arrogance/ignorance.

The hacker looks like a dumbass... the screenshot revealed his proxy session. Unless he was stacking proxies...:

"Usually, this sort of thing would be hard to track down because it's Yahoo email, and a lot of people use my service for that," he told El Reg in a phone interview. "Since they were dumb enough to post a full screenshot that showed most of the [Ctunnel.com] URL, I should be able to find that in my log."
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/09/18/palin_email_investigation/

That damned first amendment, always letting people share information...

I just hate that man so much it hurts.

I don't really hate him. I just pity him. He's so ignorant and rude that he probably has no friends. I mean why even invite an attorney on the show and then question her correct interpretation of the law? And she's Fox staff, I bet even they can't stand him.

What an idiot.

If it was anyone else who's got hacked no one would care to prosecute. I get that it's different because she's a VP candidate, but does this actually have any effect on her position? If it doesn't, then her case should be the same as anyone else who has the same thing happen. I haven't read the email, but this is just stupid.

He's awfully defensive there, so what delicious tidbits does Billy'O have floating around in his yahoo e-mail

It amazes me that she thinks "Anonymous" is one person.

And I'd like to point out that whoever "hacked" her account is not a fucking hacker, but just some moron that wanted to get in her inbox.

Any real hacker would have been smart enough to use more than ONE proxy, and access the internet from a random hotspot.
Also, they wouldn't say "I unplugged my internet."

You have an internet? I want one, too!

Tags for this video have been changed from 'bill oreily, megyn kelly, wrong, email, fox, sarah palin' to 'bill oreilly, megyn kelly, wrong, email, fox, sarah palin' - edited by my15minutes

How is it possible that in a huge country , like US , and certantly advanced in media communications etc. , you have people so dumb , like Bill Oreilly , to host a national news program ?

something tells me the amount of time FAUX News spent on this story was much greater than the time they spent looking into the Obama assassination plot. OF course, reading someone's e-mail is a much more serious violation than trying to kill them.

You don't need a lawyer to make Bill O'Reilly look stupid. All you need is:

3 working brain cells
1/2 sense of logic
30 seconds airtime

Mix ingredients together, but do not overly-mix, or your microphone will be turned off.

In a separate saucepan, bring water to a boil, then add 1 whole Bill O'Reilly. Turn heat down and simmer until he yells, "FUCK IT, WE'LL DO IT LIVE!"

Remove from burner and let cool down for five minutes, or until interview is over.

Serve on a chilled plate with a side of falafel.

Why is this guy on tv? Similar arguments i've seen in general chat on wow, down the pub between 2 drug dealers, etc.

Why is he telling anecdotes about mail to try and prove that he's correct vs. someone who is telling him the law says he's wrong? And then over the course of 2 minutes he changes his argument subtly to indicate that, rather than being wrong, he's just describing what it should be like.

Reminds me of tubes... who, I might add, has been in trouble recently...

HA HA he is stupid

i like how they both refer to the hacker as "he." i might not know much about this story, but are they actually sure that it's a man (boy?)?

the sad thing is that there are people who are actually going to agree with Mr. Bill O'Jackass. And they'll say I'm a liberal stooge for wanting to protect freedom of the press. :-(
will someone please educate these retards!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Fuck it! I'd do her live!

>> ^campionidelmondo:
I don't really hate him. I just pity him. He's so ignorant and rude that he probably has no friends. I mean why even invite an attorney on the show and then question her correct interpretation of the law? And she's Fox staff, I bet even they can't stand him.


It's impossible for me to hate O'Reilly the way I hate Hannity.

no bill, it's not like stealing a car, you fucking dumbass.

Clever Person: "you're not talking about free speech, you're talking about money"

Bill: "it's the same thing"

OK case closed, you fucking dumbass. You're not even a clever cynic, you're just a dumbass.

>> ^Payback:
Fuck it! I'd do her live!


She had my undivided attention erection.

It would be easier to listen to him long enough to hate him sufficiently for his actual viewpoints if he would just stop interrupting EVERYONE he talks to.

I think Bill has a minor point in reguards to possession of stole goods, but he fails to understand the fatal flaw is his analogy; if the guy who stole the mail from your mailbox calls his friend, and tells him that you received a letter from your mother that says how you used to wet the bed, that friend is in possession of some juicy gossip, but not the actual letter. He cant be charged with jack. If he wrote down what was on the letter word for word and handed it to his friend, his friend is only in possession of some paper and ink given to him legally and information, which, at least as far as I know has no laws regulating ownership of that information, with the possible exception being IP and copyright law.

Palin's Email basically amounts to the same thing, and screen shots of the emails are nothing more than transmition of information.

His ignorance is huge.

He is ignorant. Id do her.

talk slow to do the woman. theen sheell geeet iiit.

what a stupid idiot he is.

I love this for the number of times she rolls her eyes!

Oh, and yes, I would.

Wow he didn't see that coming.

"And here's the pretty lady that's going to agree with me and make me look good. Hi pretty lady."
"Hi Bill. You're wrong, and this is why."
"Sorry we've run out of time for today."

how do they know it's a him? that's sexist.

>> ^rottenseed:
how do they know it's a him? that's sexist.


That can't be, Bill O just became a feminist.

Hi, my name is Bill O'Reilly. (Hi Bill!)

I've had a lifelong problem with following logic. It just doesn't make sense to me in my world, so I choose not to listen to or adhere to any kind of logical sense or deduction. Just because a law isn't written down and passed, doesn't mean it shouldn't exist! It's my way or the highway! Fuck it!

The sad part about this is that many older people (including those in government) really do not know the subtle differences in the way the US laws approach physical property and intellectual property. Sure, Bill is an ass about it, but his lack of understanding on this issue is far from surprising. He grew up in a time when information always had a physical form, and that mode of thinking just doesn't work in the internet age.

Zifnab,

You just insulted retards everywhere.

Well, we can always explain her away as a liberal or something, right?

>> ^thinker247:
You don't need a lawyer to make Bill O'Reilly look stupid. All you need is:

...to let him speak for longer than three seconds on any topic of his own choosing.


Fixed that for ya.

^He grew up in a time when information always had a physical form, and that mode of thinking just doesn't work in the internet age.


Before teh interwebz, this was still ok in the physical world, no? Like if somebody steals documents and then turns them over to a newspaper? The theif can be charged, but the newspaper is in the clear if they had nothing to do with the theft. It's the duty of the free press to report the news.

As long as they had no hand in the steeling of it... You have to just love BO can bring a supposed expert on his show to talk about a point, clearly expecting her to just agree with all his pre-concieved notions... and was just completely floored when anything else was said... immediatly he regresses into his usually... No... No... NO... NO... NO... if i say it enough... and loudly enough... It won't be So!.... Scew you... i'm taking my ball and going home.

Whats his view on warrentless wiretaps? Stealing is bad.....unless it's the gov't doing it duh!!!

<img src="http://www.ucubd.com/UcubdImageServer/ShowMashupImage.gif?id=778">

Both of them are adept at the art of bluffing. They wouldn't cite a particular supreme court case or a particular law.

*dead

This video has been declared non-functional; embed code must be fixed within 2 days or it will be sent to the dead pool - declared dead by luxury_pie.

Fixed, thanks for the replacement @luxury_pie