Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
28 Comments
taranimatorsays...Woah!
NicoleBeesays...Jeez D:
quantumushroomsays...On the plus side, Mr. Acorns wasn't run over.
Kruposays...*quality terror
siftbotsays...Boosting this quality contribution up in the Hot Listing - declared quality by Krupo.
Kallesays...Seriously fuck the editing...
skinnydaddy1says...On a side note. It could of been much much much worse. The tanker was an empty Liquid Hydrogen tanker heading back to get another load.
rychansays...>> ^Kalle:
Seriously fuck the editing...
Yeah, what the hell. I've seen clean versions of this clip before, without the horrible repetition, skipping, and music.
Hybridsays...@Kalle and @rychan - I've replaced the embed with what appears to be the original, unedited footage.
Trancecoachsays...was waiting for the kaboom
dystopianfuturetodaysays...Them Dukes!
dagsays...Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag.(show it anyway)
Bruckheimeresque
jimnmssays...*fear
siftbotsays...Adding video to channels (Fear) - requested by jimnms.
xxovercastxxsays...I could swear I've seen this here already.
Paybacksays...>> ^Trancecoach:
was waiting for the kaboom
Obviously the trucker forgot his illudium Q-36 explosive space modulator.
IronDwarfsays...>> ^xxovercastxx:
I could swear I've seen this here already.
I thought so too, but I think it was part of a video montage of car crashes. I don't think this clip has been posted on its own.
Issykittysays...Chilling.
xxovercastxxsays...>> ^IronDwarf:
>> ^xxovercastxx:
I could swear I've seen this here already.
I thought so too, but I think it was part of a video montage of car crashes. I don't think this clip has been posted on its own.
It would still be a dupe if anyone can figure out what the original video is.
Hybridsays...No it wouldn't.>> ^xxovercastxx:
>> ^IronDwarf:
>> ^xxovercastxx:
I could swear I've seen this here already.
I thought so too, but I think it was part of a video montage of car crashes. I don't think this clip has been posted on its own.
It would still be a dupe if anyone can figure out what the original video is.
Paybacksays...>> ^Hybrid:
No it wouldn't.>> ^xxovercastxx:
>> ^IronDwarf:
>> ^xxovercastxx:
I could swear I've seen this here already.
I thought so too, but I think it was part of a video montage of car crashes. I don't think this clip has been posted on its own.
It would still be a dupe if anyone can figure out what the original video is.
It would be a smaller section of a larger video. Technically... dupe.
Hybridsays...These dupe discussions have been had before. The focus of the video is different. I'm not posting a compilation. I'm highlighting one crash.
This is no different to say someone posting an entire 60 minute interview with someone, and then someone posting a 30 second clip to highlight something specific they said.
This is a unique crash that should have it's own sift IMO.
xxovercastxxsays...>> ^Hybrid:
This is no different to say someone posting an entire 60 minute interview with someone, and then someone posting a 30 second clip to highlight something specific they said.
Exactly, and those have been ruled dupes. People who like to post them tried to mount an argument for keeping them, but they're still reposting stuff that's already here.
Stingraysays...That discussion was talking about the same news story/interview. In the event of video compilations of many small scenes sifted, they have always been allowed. Just look to the many sifts of fail compilations.
>> ^xxovercastxx:
>> ^Hybrid:
This is no different to say someone posting an entire 60 minute interview with someone, and then someone posting a 30 second clip to highlight something specific they said.
Exactly, and those have been ruled dupes. People who like to post them tried to mount an argument for keeping them, but they're still reposting stuff that's already here.
AnimalsForCrackerssays...I typed out an obligatory Terminator/T-1000 reference.
xxovercastxxsays...>> ^Stingray:
That discussion was talking about the same news story/interview. In the event of video compilations of many small scenes sifted, they have always been allowed. Just look to the many sifts of fail compilations.
>> ^xxovercastxx:
>> ^Hybrid:
This is no different to say someone posting an entire 60 minute interview with someone, and then someone posting a 30 second clip to highlight something specific they said.
Exactly, and those have been ruled dupes. People who like to post them tried to mount an argument for keeping them, but they're still reposting stuff that's already here.
They're allowed when the short clip comes first and the compilation second because you're sifting new content. They're not allowed when the compilation is first and the clip is second because that's, well, a dupe.
Dag clearly says this in the conversation I linked to. That the videos being discussed were closer to equal is irrelevant.
siftbotsays...Tags for this video have been changed from 'car, crash, police, truck, people, lucky, skidding, fail, trailer, tanker' to 'car, crash, police, truck, semi, lucky, skid, fail, trailer, tanker, jack knife' - edited by BoneRemake
siftbotsays...5 more comments have been lost in the ether at this killed duplicate.
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.