Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
6 Comments
antsays...*music
siftbotsays...Adding video to channels (Music) - requested by ant.
visionepsays...Nice dramatic music.
The thing was way too loud for recreational use. It also wasn't stable in wind and never had a safety system implemented so when there was a failure you just fell out of the sky from 100 feet up.
The 45 minute running time is very optimistic. The amount of thrust for fuel burned ( 0.683 lb/lbf/h) is not efficient. The engine also only provided 600lbs of thrust where the entire system weighed just over 400 lbs without fuel or a pilot.
No conspiracy, just not financially and technically useful enough to garner further development.
The Wikipedia article give a lot of good technical details, you can also look up the patent. A little data and common sense can easily overcome the drama created by overly dramatic music.
noimssays...Yes, you've just hit on Noims' first two Laws of Aeronautics:
1) If you see a video of something flying and there's no audio, the thing is extremely loud.
2) If it's small, self-contained, and not super-light, it has an extremely short flight time.
Nice dramatic music.
The thing was way too loud for recreational use. [...]
The 45 minute running time is very optimistic. [...]
BSRsays...Should have used the music from The Jetsons
...overly dramatic music.
siftbotsays...Moving this video to newtboy's personal queue. It failed to receive enough votes to get sifted up to the front page within 2 days.
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.