*length=2:23

The duration of this video has been updated from unknown to 2:23 - length declared by oritteropo.

If this were America, he would've been tased as soon as he started talking back

Would have been better if he whipped out Powerpoint on his laptop to explain.

"Exploiting socio-economic stratification to avoid a ticket." jerk.

I'm guessing saying "Because Physics!" wouldn't suffice...

TRUST ME, I'M A SCIENTIST!

>> ^EvilDeathBee:

If this were America, he would've been tased as soon as he started talking back


Hah or he would be ticketed anyway like most drivers who try and talk their way out of their ticket whom aren't attractive women (assuming a gullible cop of course). There's no "physics" argument involved in whether he stopped or not, just whether it could be observed based on the incline of the hill and the relative safety of stopping on a hill abruptly.

The cop was intimidated/conned by intellectual speak where most cops and definitely most I've come across in the US would just say "tell it to the judge" because that is the process for explaining extenuating circumstance properly. The cop could/would say "I saw it the way I said, u can explain the rest though _____ process and if the camera refutes it they'll likely drop it. For now here's the ticket and what to expect"

Kudos to the driver as there's no harm being done here to anyone, but I've found the best way to avoid a ticket is to be polite and apologetic about the things I actually did wrong (like a california stop or going 10 over) and hope they feel bad for screwing over a nice guy. Arguing just gives them more reason to find pleasure in ticketing you.

Just because you have a clever excuse for the one time you get pulled over every year doesn't mean your not the 5th person that DAY to try and con the cop out of of a ticket.

This is an advertisement for a hair product called 'Code10' - See the end of the original youtube video here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=jcXYGdSAzKY#t=139s

At 1:30 he had already lost the cop with his infinite knowledge.

You're damned right. For one thing, he's driving on the WRONG side of the car.

>> ^EvilDeathBee:

If this were America, he would've been tased as soon as he started talking back

*science

Adding video to channels (Science) - requested by messenger.

The math adds up. You can check it on my website.

>> ^dirkdeagler7:


I've found the best way to avoid a ticket is to be polite and apologetic about the things I actually did wrong (like a california stop or going 10 over) and hope they feel bad for screwing over a nice guy. Arguing just gives them more reason to find pleasure in ticketing you.

Yep, I've had this work even when I was going a bit more than that and it works most of the time. So far the only time I've been ticketed with this is "by the book" cops, which is a good thing in terms of police doing their job well.

I talked my way out of a ticket once by clearly demonstrating the cop was wrong. I told the cop - see my radar detector? You were using constant radar from before the time you came around that corner. Why would I speed past you if I knew you were using your radar before you even got on the same street as me?

Well then? WHO passed me speeding he says?

That identical looking red car that just parked at KFC behind me!

(The cop had to turn around to come after the "perp" and lost sight of the vehicle for a few seconds.)

This is a *viral ad.

Invocations (viral) cannot be called by mxxcon because mxxcon is not privileged - sorry.

I didn't understand any of the physics in that.

Wouldn't matter in this country - if on his approach the light had been green for a while he should be expecting it to change and slowing accordingly.

Ran a red light? Blame the Doppler Effect.

>> ^mxxcon:

This is a viral ad.


Let me *viral fix that for you.

Adding video to channels (Viral) - requested by Krupo.