Bad move. Now he's got violating a court order, violating terms of release, perjury, and witness intimidation charges pending and is ineligible for bail.
I can't see this helping with his domestic abuse case either.

Perhaps the evidence was clearer in earlier parts of the video than where the timestamp picks up, but from what I saw I would NOT have picked up on the issue. Unless her responses were unusually vague or felt "off" in some other way - I'd not really have a basis for comparison there. The physical reactions alone certainly didn't clue me in at all.

Only thing that would make sense to me is, Deborah must be a mother. Mothers can pick up on clues that are impossible for the male to detect.

I think the plaintiff's lawyer becomes suspicious at 7:22 when the defense lawyer is making his objection. You see the plaintiff look over her right shoulder and, the first time I watched it, I thought she was struggling to hear what the defense lawyer was saying. But watching it a second time, you can see her jaw moving, like she is mouthing something to someone and the defendant's video shuts off for a bit. The prosecutor likely had more context and had spoken to the plaintiff before as well, so probably had a gut feeling as to what was transpiring. Still a crazy good call though!

*dead

This video has been declared non-functional; embed code must be fixed within 2 days or it will be sent to the dead pool - declared dead by makach.

Found a fix, although not as complete as the original. Shows nothing leading up to lawyer questioning the location of the abuser.

Decided to *discard it after all as it's much better with complete video.

Discarding this post - discard requested by original submitter eric3579.