Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
7 Comments
Guntersays...Gonna be painful when they bust ass and that soft skin gets ripped off like paper....
conansays...you confuse "hot" with "barely naked". the two are not the same.
Skeevesays...I assure you I did not confuse the two terms - if I thought it was some ugly but "barely naked" girls maybe I would have just said it was some barely naked girls. In this case I think I described them accurately.>> ^conan:
you confuse "hot" with "barely naked". the two are not the same.
lucky760says...Gleaming the cube.
probiesays...Maryhill Loops road, Washington
GeeSussFreeKsays...>> ^conan:
you confuse "hot" with "barely naked". the two are not the same.
My hotness theorem states that for an given state of attractiveness, levels of clothing tend to push towards the naturally trending direction via the removal of clothing. So, if there is a girl whom is attractive and nearly naked, it is hard to know if it is the fact that she is truly attractive or naked that is alluring, but regardless, she was treading towards attractive before she started to remove clothing. The same goes for a person whom is unattractive, the more clothing removed, the more appealing the person becomes. Thus, we must conclude that these girls started relatively attractive!
Also, boobs, that is all.
kymbossays...Babysit me!
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.