Post has been Discarded

Have A Very Topless Christmas

Three undressed girls exchange snowflakes.
MycroftHomlzsays...

"VideoSift does not allow videos containing explicit sexual content. If such a video is submitted, it will be promptly removed and the submitter may be subject to a temporary or permanent ban. "Explicit sexual content" is defined on VideoSift as gratuitous nudity of a sexual nature lacking any reasonable artistic and educational merit, implying its sole intent is to cause sexual arousal."

All due respect @marinara, I think we should discard this video. It sends a bad message to people who see this site for the first time. It is unrepentantly sexist, misogynistic, and degrading towards women.

Don't get me wrong, I love bewbs as much as the next guy, but this is just bewbs for the sake of bewbs with no other redeeming elements artistic or otherwise.

hamsteralliancesays...

>> ^MycroftHomlz:

"VideoSift does not allow videos containing explicit sexual content. If such a video is submitted, it will be promptly removed and the submitter may be subject to a temporary or permanent ban. "Explicit sexual content" is defined on VideoSift as gratuitous nudity of a sexual nature lacking any reasonable artistic and educational merit, implying its sole intent is to cause sexual arousal."
All due respect @marinara, I think we should discard this video. It sends a bad message to people who see this site for the first time. It is unrepentantly sexist, misogynistic, and degrading towards women.
Don't get me wrong, I love bewbs as much as the next guy, but this is just bewbs for the sake of bewbs with no other redeeming elements artistic or otherwise.


Boobs for the sake of boobs sounds like the best and least degrading way to show boobs. They're boobs being boobs, doing what they do. Saying that the boobs have to be wrapped in what you recognize as an artistic context for them to be appropriate sounds more degrading to me.

BoneRemakesays...

Well if that quote is where I think it is from, Mycrofthomlz has a solid case. This is just girls topless, different story is there might of been a pie chart or two in the back ground.

dagsays...

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag.(show it anyway)

OK, thought about it. This does fall afoul of the guidelines and not something we want to be a precedent. Sorry marinara I'm going to make a call on this - not good for the Sift. *discard.

Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists




notify when someone comments
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
  
Learn More