goto ~4:40 for bachmann "story". it lasts until 5:00.

before is casey anthony trial, and after is atheism.

overall length, 8 minutes of video for twenty second comment.

good day.

^ Poor baby! Blame the guy who posted it to youtube. Don't kill the messenger.

>> ^Duckman33:

^ Poor baby! Blame the guy who posted it to youtube. Don't kill the messenger.

Right? Captain of the douche canoe over here. I don't mean you, Duck.

I for one can't BELIEVE I just sat through 8 minutes of entertaining banter for a 20 second quote in the middle.

DOWN
|
|
|
V
VOTE!

I hope you guys were joking... but if not, I downvoted for commentary douchey-ness.

I like the entire segment, the title could be more inclusive to the other parts. "Bill Maher on Casey Anthony, Bachmann and Atheism" for example. :-)

backup[]

Added alternate embed code for this video - backup requested by gwiz665.

The backup has only the relevant part. Change to that, if you like @Duckman33.

I liked the whole thing too. Otherwise I would have just made it start at the quote. Title changed to DerHasisttot's suggestion. Thanks for the backup G.

My god. I didn't think Piers Morgan could get more boring. What have you done to him America?!?

Oh Captain, my Captain. The irony .... she was lost.

We really need to get our most vocal atheists to be more consistent on the definition of atheism. This "6.9 on a scale of 1 to 7" bullshit is not helping. You wanna say "skeptic", fine. You wanna say "agnostic", fine. But then follow it up with "Those are all types of atheism, which simply means non-religious."

i was talking about the youtube description. guilty conscience at not watching your own sub, lashing out at someone. shame. i wanted more bachmann bashing.

Dammit! Sorry for the comment downvotes then. My bad.

There can never be enough Bachmann bashing (in the figurative sense, of course).

>> ^MaxWilder:

We really need to get our most vocal atheists to be more consistent on the definition of atheism. This "6.9 on a scale of 1 to 7" bullshit is not helping. You wanna say "skeptic", fine. You wanna say "agnostic", fine. But then follow it up with "Those are all types of atheism, which simply means non-religious."


Then don't say agnostic because it's not a "type of atheism". Agnosticism is the position that we cannot know one way or another because we are only human. It's a separate issue from what we believe or disbelieve.

>> ^xxovercastxx:

>> ^MaxWilder:
We really need to get our most vocal atheists to be more consistent on the definition of atheism. This "6.9 on a scale of 1 to 7" bullshit is not helping. You wanna say "skeptic", fine. You wanna say "agnostic", fine. But then follow it up with "Those are all types of atheism, which simply means non-religious."

Then don't say agnostic because it's not a "type of atheism". Agnosticism is the position that we cannot know one way or another because we are only human. It's a separate issue from what we believe or disbelieve.


That is quite true, but that's not how people use the word these days. That is unfortunate, of course, but in my opinion it is not quite as bad as misusing the word "atheist". I'd rather pick that fight first. But I suppose as long as we're trying to fix one, we might as well try to fix both.

if you are non-white and poor, convictions come rather easily

Piers Morgan is an utter moron. I'd suggest we send him back to the UK, but I don't think they want him either.

*dead

Automatically replaced video embed code with backup #3850 (supplied by member gwiz665) - video declared dead by member geo321.

*dead

This video has been declared non-functional; embed code must be fixed within 2 days or it will be sent to the dead pool - declared dead by geo321.