A real BoneRfied TIT job.

How often do you see that ?
berticussays...

"Breast enhancement surgery benefits women who are unhappy with the size, shape, or form of their breasts. Often times, breast size impacts a womans security with herself and her body. By recontouring the shape, with the help of saline or silicone implants, these women regain their confidence and self-esteem, allowing them to feel sexy, desirable, and good about themselves."

*sigh* I hate our fuckin' species.

hpqpsays...

Hey, don't give the TSA any ideas, they're gropey enough already.

>> ^marinara:

i bet terrorists are going to smuggle liquid explosives in perfectly shaped breasts now.
seriously. if they confiscate our bottled water, they should confiscate our breast implants

bareboards2says...

Way to miss the point, there, rotten.... that doctor is the villian here. (Although I don't understand the FFM reference, maybe you are calling out that hack of a doctor who should lose his license as a doctor and as a human being.)


>> ^rottenseed:

>> ^bareboards2:
Why the hell anyone would mess with those beautiful breasts enrages me.
What the fuck. WHAT THE FUCK.

YEA! Let's tag-team this broad!!! It'll be the world's first FFM Eiffel Tower...we'll call it the EiFFMel Tower

citojokingly says...

Now this bitch will probably yell sexual harassment when some guy whistles at her at work or she gets groped.

If you gonna pump up the fun bags, then be prepared to be treated as an object.


fake silicon bitches are only good for 1 thing, as jizz rags

NinjaInHeatsays...

The doctor is a villain and should lose his license? Did he do something wrong or is that your general stand regarding any plastic surgeon? How about tattoo artists?

Whether you approve or not is irrelevant, wouldn't you agree?

>> ^bareboards2:

Way to miss the point, there, rotten.... that doctor is the villian here. (Although I don't understand the FFM reference, maybe you are calling out that hack of a doctor who should lose his license as a doctor and as a human being.)

>> ^rottenseed:
>> ^bareboards2:
Why the hell anyone would mess with those beautiful breasts enrages me.
What the fuck. WHAT THE FUCK.

YEA! Let's tag-team this broad!!! It'll be the world's first FFM Eiffel Tower...we'll call it the EiFFMel Tower


bareboards2says...

No, I don't think it is irrelevant.

If every single person said to this poor woman -- your body was beautiful just the way it was, please don't deform yourself for some idea in your head, then maybe just maybe, this would stop.

And yeah, I can have an opinion. A really strong one.

And yes, doctors who deform perfectly healthy bodies should be subject to peer review.

I had a friend years ago who had breast enhancement surgery. She lost a lot of weight and was so happy to be comfortable in her body. With the weight loss, her breasts shrunk and were deformed looking. She showed me a picture of her before -- it looked like she had two deflated hot dogs laying down her chest.

Now there is a woman whose self esteem was truly enhanced by surgery.

This woman? No way.

You want to comment on someone's post? Go say something to @cito. That is the most disgusting, rank, filthy thing he wrote and I am the only one to downvote it? And you want to lecture me about my opinion?




>> ^NinjaInHeat:

The doctor is a villain and should lose his license? Did he do something wrong or is that your general stand regarding any plastic surgeon? How about tattoo artists?
Whether you approve or not is irrelevant, wouldn't you agree?

NinjaInHeatsays...

The thing that disappoints me about statements like these is that they're not objective. There's a general tendency among the hardcore liberals here (not you specifically but I find this to be an example of this behavior) to defend values like freedom of choice/speech/etc, but only so long as they fit certain ideals they have for their vision of a 'good society'.

I get what you're saying, I can honestly tell you that I not only sympathize but whole-heartily agree; damn shame that a woman would subject her perfectly natural, normal body to this procedure.

But here's where we part ways: so what if it disturbs me? Who the hell cares what I think? It's her choice. I don't support women's right to have abortions because I think they're the proper/healthy course of action for some women in some situations (though they definitely are), I support it because it should be their right to decide what's proper/healthy for themselves, regardless of how I feel about it.

And as for cito, his comment wasn't worth reading let alone commenting on. I would downvote but I was under the impression I have to be some special-star-mega-shiny-member to downvote stuff.

>> ^bareboards2:

No, I don't think it is irrelevant.
If every single person said to this poor woman -- your body was beautiful just the way it was, please don't deform yourself for some idea in your head, then maybe just maybe, this would stop.
And yeah, I can have an opinion. A really strong one.
And yes, doctors who deform perfectly healthy bodies should be subject to peer review.
I had a friend years ago who had breast enhancement surgery. She lost a lot of weight and was so happy to be comfortable in her body. With the weight loss, her breasts shrunk and were deformed looking. She showed me a picture of her before -- it looked like she had two deflated hot dogs laying down her chest.
Now there is a woman whose self esteem was truly enhanced by surgery.
This woman? No way.
You want to comment on someone's post? Go say something to @cito. That is the most disgusting, rank, filthy thing he wrote and I am the only one to downvote it? And you want to lecture me about my opinion?


>> ^NinjaInHeat:
The doctor is a villain and should lose his license? Did he do something wrong or is that your general stand regarding any plastic surgeon? How about tattoo artists?
Whether you approve or not is irrelevant, wouldn't you agree?


bareboards2says...

But do things change unless we speak up?

You're right -- I would not want to pass a bunch of laws restricting all actions to only what **I** think is correct.

However, righteous indignation and howling into the wilderness when watching a beautiful woman deform herself, aided by a licensed professional -- this needs doing. More people need to do it. Men need to do it. If more people did it, maybe it would stop.

The journey of a thousand miles starts with a single step. I'm going to take that step and the next one.

You're right about downvoting also -- now that I have my stars, I think everyone has the same powers. Silly me.


>> ^NinjaInHeat:

The thing that disappoints me about statements like these is that they're not objective. There's a general tendency among the hardcore liberals here (not you specifically but I find this to be an example of this behavior) to defend values like freedom of choice/speech/etc, but only so long as they fit certain ideals they have for their vision of a 'good society'.
I get what you're saying, I can honestly tell you that I not only sympathize but whole-heartily agree; damn shame that a woman would subject her perfectly natural, normal body to this procedure.
But here's where we part ways: so what if it disturbs me? Who the hell cares what I think? It's her choice. I don't support women's right to have abortions because I think they're the proper/healthy course of action for some women in some situations (though they definitely are), I support it because it should be their right to decide what's proper/healthy for themselves, regardless of how I feel about it.
And as for cito, his comment wasn't worth reading let alone commenting on. I would downvote but I was under the impression I have to be some special-star-mega-shiny-member to downvote stuff.

gwiz665says...

The doctor is providing a service. If she wants it, who are we to prevent it? Liberals tend to be the "I know it better than you" police and want to outlaw things they think is bad - that in itself is worse.

TheGenksays...

Let me chime into this discussion about, let's call it broadly body-modification so it can include piercings, tatoos, surgeries and so on.

My stance is quite simple: If a person, for whatever reason, wants to modify his or her own body, then they should be allowed to do so. It is their body and thus their decision and no one elses. If a person provides said service they can do so as long as they do not harm the person they provide this service to(harm is a bit fuzzy, I know).

In the case of this video, I see no reason why the woman should not be allowed to get the surgery done and why the doctor should not be allowed to perform it. Even though, I, personally, consider her chest more attractive without the added silicone.

It may surprise people to hear such a viewpoint from a guy without any piercings or tatoos (or implants), but that is just because I consider things like that childs play. Those are only aesthetical modifications and I want ones that upgrade bodily functions. If I could get legs that would allow me to jump 10m hight I would get them.

I think @NinjaInHeat's point of view is very close to mine and would agree with me, but I don't quite understand where you @bareboards2 differ, so please elaborate.

NinjaInHeatjokingly says...

We don't. At first she was all "damn, that shit's nasty yo, like, illegally nasty yo", and I was like "it ain't illegally nasty yo" and she was all like "tru dat, tru dat, but nasty yo" then I was all "word, some nasty shit yo".

But to be fair I'm only siding with the doctor to make myself feel comfortable with the extensive surgical aesthetic modifications I'm considering for my genitalia.

>> ^TheGenk:

Let me chime into this discussion about, let's call it broadly body-modification so it can include piercings, tatoos, surgeries and so on.
My stance is quite simple: If a person, for whatever reason, wants to modify his or her own body, then they should be allowed to do so. It is their body and thus their decision and no one elses. If a person provides said service they can do so as long as they do not harm the person they provide this service to(harm is a bit fuzzy, I know).
In the case of this video, I see no reason why the woman should not be allowed to get the surgery done and why the doctor should not be allowed to perform it. Even though, I, personally, consider her chest more attractive without the added silicone.
It may surprise people to hear such a viewpoint from a guy without any piercings or tatoos (or implants), but that is just because I consider things like that childs play. Those are only aesthetical modifications and I want ones that upgrade bodily functions. If I could get legs that would allow me to jump 10m hight I would get them.
I think @NinjaInHeat's point of view is very close to mine and would agree with me, but I don't quite understand where you @bareboards2 differ, so please elaborate.

TheGenkjokingly says...

>> ^NinjaInHeat:

We don't. At first she was all "damn, that shit's nasty yo, like, illegally nasty yo", and I was like "it ain't illegally nasty yo" and she was all like "tru dat, tru dat, but nasty yo" then I was all "word, some nasty shit yo".
But to be fair I'm only siding with the doctor to make myself feel comfortable with the extensive surgical aesthetic modifications I'm considering for my genitalia.


Your genitalia is fine, really.

Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists




notify when someone comments
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
  
Learn More