Full documentary here: http://videosift.com/video/9-11-Explosive-Evidence-Experts-Speak-Out

NIST: World Trade Center 7 collapsed because of fires fueled by office furnishes. It did not collapse from explosives or from fuel-oil fires.
...
This is what NIST has done, denied and ignored crucial evidence. ... Building number 7 descended in free-fall for the first 100 feet, which means there was absolutely no resistance in the descent whatsoever. ... NIST has admitted it went into free-fall for 8 stories.
...
NIST excluded the document from FEMA, in appendix C, that documented the evidence of melting steel. In a office fire, you cannot generate enough heat to melt steel.
...
In the dust, what we have found is a modern version of thermite. ... NIST concedes that they found no evidence for explosives. So then we asked them, well did you look? And they said, no we did not look for explosives, or residues of explosives. "NIST did not test for the presence of explosive residue" - Catherine Fletcher, Freedom of Information Act Officer, NIST
...
And in fact the evidence is overwhelming that these red grade crystals are very high temperature incendiaries. ... Evidence was removed from the scene of the crime. You can't do science when you are deprived of the evidence and when your hypothesis is the least valid instead of the most likely. When the most likely hypothesis, in the case of building 7, wasn't even mentioned--this is not science.