Post has been Discarded
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
11 Comments
Farhad2000says...2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) is a science fiction novel by Arthur C. Clarke which was developed concurrently with Stanley Kubrick's film version. The story is based in part on various short stories by Clarke, most notably "The Sentinel" (1951). Kubrick collaborated with Clarke, and together they first concurrently produced the novel version that was released after the film.
The HAL 9000 computer symbolizes the progress of technology. It represents many apprehensions about technology. First, HAL is an artificial intelligence – it can mimic all of the thought processes of the human brain with greater speed and reliability. Second, its inner workings are not completely understood – even by the people who created it. HAL is an extraordinarily potent technology that cannot be fully controlled. When HAL begins to deviate from the way in which it has been programmed, this is an illustration of the apprehension many people held that our own technological development will someday come back to haunt us in surprising and unanticipated ways.
Obviously one of my favorite movies.
Daisy, Daisy, give me your answer do
I'm half crazy all for the love of you
It won't be a stylish marriage
I can't afford a carriage
But you'll look sweet upon the seat
Of a bicycle built for two
pho3n1xsays...HAL -
H+1 = I
A+1 = B
L+1 = M
Farhad2000says...A common misconception is that the name HAL was derived by a one letter shift from the name IBM, although this has been denied by both Arthur C. Clarke and his fictional character Dr. Chandra, who states that "by now, any idiot should know that HAL stands for Heuristic ALgorithmic".
Not my words
dotdudesays...So is siftbot any relation to Hal?
dagsays...Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag.(show it anyway)
This movie really stands the test of time. I think the special effects are still more realistic than most recent space movies. The starkness of the lighting on the exterior shots, the lack of bright twinkling stars - the absence of sound ...
Kubrick was amazing.
deputydogsays...*genius
darksunsays...*geek
siftbotsays...Video added to geek channel (geek called by gold star member darksun)
swampgirlsays...farhad, this one's *dead
siftbotsays...The link to this video has been flagged as dead. Fix it within 7 days or it will be discarded (dead called by gold star member swampgirl)
siftbotsays...Discarding this video. It was flagged as dead but not flagged undead within 7 days.
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.