Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Check your email for a verification code and enter it below.Don't close this box or you must fill out this form again.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
the world is a bit less brighter today (Death Talk Post)
Sweet dreams Schmawy. You will not be forgotten.
Ron Funches' Guide to Black Cosplay
*nochannel
*comedy
*comics
*howto *geek
11-Year-Old Girl Speaks Out About Forced Marriage
I wouldn't be surprised if there were three dragon eggs in the trunk of this car.
We will definitely be seeing her face again. I bet she changes the Middle Eastern world for the better and in a big way.
11-Year-Old Girl Speaks Out About Forced Marriage
*cracks knuckles*
guess I'm a little rusty ...
*doublepromote
11-Year-Old Girl Speaks Out About Forced Marriage
*frontpage
GOP Lawmaker Regrets Voting Against Same-Sex Marriage
*equality
GOP Lawmaker Regrets Voting Against Same-Sex Marriage
-
A Gay Brigadier General Asks a question
*equality
If "Heterophobia" Were Real
*promote
*quality
*equality
*dark
Nestle CEO Explains that Water Should not be a Human Right
*controversy
Native American Shuts Down Anti-Illegal Immigrant Protest
I guess it's just semantics. I'm sorry for making an issue of it, especially since it seems that anytime I speak here I'm confronted by a psychopathic sock puppet.
I'm not really making an argument, just critiquing the one offered in the video. As Lucky points out, we're in agreement that it is ridiculous to compare territorial conquest by military force to immigration. My last statement about how the parrot protestors could respond is to point out the absurdity of that comparison (and to point out their ignorance in regards to the benefits of immigration). I also agree with Lucky's interpretation of the guy's message and with the message itself.
From a moral perspective, I don't believe that successfully taking something by force is self-justifying. On the other hand, the use of force at the level of geopolitics is often self-justifying, even if we find it morally repugnant as individuals.
Native American Shuts Down Anti-Illegal Immigrant Protest
You're argument is flawed as well. Generally speaking, people immigrating here (legally or not) aren't trying to take military control over the country. They just want a better life. To compare a group of impoverished "huddled masses, yearning to breath free," to a military force is ridiculous. Do you seriously equate illegal immigration to military invasion? Do you think Mexicans coming to the US should roll over the border with tanks and stealth bombers in order to pick our apples and dig our onions out of the dirt?
Your words suggest that anything taken by force is justified.
There is a serious flaw in this guy's argument. He's absolutely right that Europeans weren't invited here and committed genocide in order to colonize. But that doesn't really have anything to do with immigration. The land was taken from his ancestors by force. If any of the nutters he's yelling at were capable of thought beyond that of a parrot, they might point out that those who wish to immigrate illegally are free to try to take it by force themselves.
Native American Shuts Down Anti-Illegal Immigrant Protest
*Politics
*Equality
*Controversy
*Law
Native American Shuts Down Anti-Illegal Immigrant Protest
*promote
Native American Shuts Down Anti-Illegal Immigrant Protest
*notdead