Captain Obvious was promoted to Major Obvious.

I'm very confused. When did the satire begin? I thought it was a cleverly edited SNL skit up until the borg clip. Do you mean to tell me that the borg clip was the ONLY edit?

I sincerely thought the half bald guy was some comedian. I'm not even trying to be ironic right now...

"How you read this report is going to be clouded by how you feel about pot in general." Bingo.

No no new science here, though. No new studies. Just re-re-reviewing existing literature.

"We know almost nothing about the medicinal effects of smoked marijuana."

If that's true... then how much do "we" know about the effects of raw cannabis, complete with it's non-psychoactive tetrahydrocannabinolic acid? The large scale, peer reviewed method works far, far to slowly to be of any real use. It is too dependent upon those with enough financial funding to be considered an authority. If "we" finally perform the "right" study on cannabis, will that magically undo nearly 100 years of unjustified criminalization, untold millions of needless deaths, and pain and suffering?

Once the Mexicans get done building the wall to keep themselves out, then the US can hire them to guard the wall.

"We've been working. For a lot of years. On understanding, mumble, mumble."

Original: https://youtu.be/c996ra7Wqn0?t=33s

And you are the guy who rapes nuns on Teusdays for peanut butter jelly sandwitches. (Hint: Lies aren't don't become true just because you type them out.)

You are welcome to continue placing your faith in the FDA, CDC, and AMA to tell you the truth. Good luck with that.

http://www.c-span.org/video/?c4546409/mr-posey

You expect me to show you massive, expensive, controlled studies published exclusively by those who have a massive, vested, financial interest in supressing the very same studies. Genius. Pure genius.

These peer reviewers are regularly lying to each other, to themselves, to the publishers, and to the public to maintain funding. They have no credibility whatsoever. You are reading studies that are all fancied up to be all technical and socially acceptable and official and scientific and peer reviewed and above reproach... And they are all lies. Calculated lies to maintain the results expected by those who fund the studies.

Our bodies are best at responding to pathogens that enter our system normally - over mucus membranes, through skin contact, and via ocassional inadvertent ingestion and inhalation.

Directly injecting pathogens (and a whole host of other known toxins) straight into the bloodstream puts their bioavailability at 100%, instantly. These damaging elements have perfect access to the brain, and all other internal organs, giving the body's almost no chance whatsoever to deal with the invading harmful elements. You can expect to see symptoms manifest in minutes, hours, or days - and this is exactly what you do see in vaccine related injuries.

Aluminum, formaldehyde, cyanide, and other elements we do eat, and are harmless when found embeded in their naturally occurring places. Injecting those refined elements (mixed together with all kinds of other poisons) directly into the bloodstream is no where close to eating un-refind foods that have the same elements bonded to other molecules which render them intert or beneficial.

What is the bioavailability of aluminum found in a banana when eaten?

What is the bioavailability of that same quantity of aluminum when the banana is pulverized and injected into the bloodstream?

What is the bioavailability of that same quantity of aluminum when it's refined, and no part of the banana except the aluminum is injected directly into the bloodstream?

Their description of the actual affect of the aluminum in particular is incomplete. Aluminum is a known neural disruptor. If it reaches the brain directly (remember, bioavailability is at 100%) the aluminum will disrupt neurons. This may result in some cases in a neural disruption. Did you know autism is a known neural disruption?

I don't know about any of these videos (haven't watched them). But it is a fact Planned Parenthood kills babies before they are born. It is also a fact that they have killed babies after they were born. No difference in effect, so why not?

And it is a fact they must dispose of the children's bodies somehow.

It's no surprise to me that they must discuss this at some point, and the costs involved.

Perhaps these videos are fake - they should be exposed as such. To me, the videos are irrelevant to the issue.

I'd say his left elbow took the brunt of the fall.

Yeah, but now he's going to enjoy the process of progressing through failure more than the success itself, so that the rest of his life every time he masters something he'll begin looking for the next challenge and eventually he'll become an autodidact that can't land a job and has to start and sell multimillion dollar companies again and again and again just to keep from going insane!!!

Removed?

Drop out of school so you can learn more important things faster.

One of the very best days of my life was the day I dropped out of college. I was living a dream for MONTHS after that. It was totally unreal. I felt truly free.

Autodidacticism: Look it up.

But he's not saying people should drop out of school. Rather, his message seems aimed at changing what schools teach to children. On this point, I'd have to disagree. The institution itself should dissolve - or rather, it already effectively has. It was never a sustainable idea. It's all upon the parents, and parents should recognize this and start acting like it. In as much as they do so, their progeny will be rewarded for their parents' diligence.

100% safe? Uh, nope. Can't make that promise.