Pacman! it's right when Sark Says "Get Them!..." when they go into the tunner after the escape the game grid. he's on the big circular maze-looking thing on the right hand side. awesome.

So, believing in Jesus is like having forks poked in your head and getting 120V ran through your brain till you glow? i wonder what 277V of Jesus would do?

The best part, I thought was the end "Belief in Jesus is Important, but don't try it at home"

I also LOVED these movies when i was a wee ninja. This one was actually my fav.

Absolutely. It seems like it's the winning entry in "How many logical fallacies can you pack into one short video?" contest. Way to represent the intellectual bias of the religious right wing! Jesus Christ...

obviously this one's for a trash compactor.

so he quoted his own book series and he's calling Darwin arrogant?

Note: Every fossilized skull that has ever been unearthed possessed sockets for the eyes; there is no exception. Any trip to a museum proves the point.


CDavidParsons:
That's great. still doesn't prove evolution is wrong. Nowhere is it suggested that the skull evolved before the eye, in fact it's the other way around. So if the eye came first, of course there wouldn't be any skulls without sockets. I see you don't mention fossils with eyes that don't have skulls?

And can you guys stop using Darwin's theory and Darwin himself as the end all and be all for evolution? The theory of Evolution has grown and expended so far over the last HUNDRED YEARS that I'm not sure Darwin would've recognized it. again, to the whole point of this post, the first theory is NOT always the best or last. Science is ever changing, correcting, and improving; unlike any religion I know of.

Ahh... sigh indeed...

Dadeeo, what you're inferring is that the first theory is always the most correct, the most complete, and best there ever was or will be. Of course this is just not true. MycroftHolmz is correct in that, as science develops better more advanced techniques and ways of finding new and more detailed explanations, so must the theories develop and evolve to include the new and better information.

The Sun going around the Earth is a perfect example. From the first evidence, of course you would theorize that the Sun orbits the Earth, how else would you interpret the evidence, especially in light of the moon's own motion. Not until we developed better and more accurate scientific evidence was the truth about the relationship between the Sun and the Earth truly revealed, and so science adapted the theory in light of the new evidence.

This is actually the CG demo for the Embrio, concept by Bombardier. the Uno is very similar, but has a couple of differences, like a stick out the back with pegs for your feet.

I applaud Hitchens in the simple fact that he started off, and kept up for quite a while, the ideal of the debate; namely the argument for and against the existence of God. Meanwhile the Rabbi fire the first personal attack volley directly at Hitchens not five minutes into the "debate". seems to me that Hitchens was the only one there to debate.