I can't help but wonder about how much fun was had in the unmentioned time between pressing the power button, and actually being able to play games.

Are you sure this isn't a segment from "Just for Laughs: Gags", the Canadian hidden camera prank show?

This looks more like Space Quest to me.

Hey dumb-asses! Don't put your mouth on any surface in a public bathroom!

Reminds me of the Brita commercial that said if we drank unfiltered tap water we might as well be drinking out of the toilet.

CBS News YouTube channel *blocked in Canada.

I guess you can't edit in an invocation later, so *quality *promote.

Might I also suggest the text or method of indicating there's more promoted videos be made a little more prominent. It's currently rather small and easy to miss.

I'm *notdead! I'm getting better! I don't want to go on the cart!

Let's *promote this *quality bit of fun.

Yes, and he's a grim reaper, so what he says about everybody having a finite amount of time is especially relevant.

Does it matter that the nuggets were different 20 years ago?

How are these rules created, and why are people always surprised by them? I imagine there's an argument made around margin of error, and then where the line should be is lobbied for. Is the "under five equals zero" rule reasonable or shady?

I feel like I'm arguing for the five second rule.

What about when you don't want that diamond ring anymore, and you want to sell it. What's it worth then?

*blocked in Canada. There's so many alternative videos on YouTube now, as this child groping incident goes viral, maybe I'll leave it up to @Mordhaus to throw a dart and choose one.

How about CBS New York: https://youtu.be/Jlpi7_xnzWQ

Bill C-16 adds "gender identity or expression" to the list of things protected by anti-discrimination law under the Canadian Human Rights Code.

The transsexual and gender non-binary communities are insisting that not using their preferred pronouns qualifies as discrimination, and therefore now punishable under this amendment.

Dr. Peterson argues that forcing people through the law to use pronouns created by this minority resembles how fascist ideologies of the past have functioned. A bad precedent to set, and not how natural societal mechanisms of language adoption function. He also seems to object to the long list of made up pronouns the gender-fluid types are insisting on.

One example of language adoption I ran across, without going into detail, was the creation and use of "Ms."

It appears Rex named the wrong university when talking about the lawyer cancelling their appearance. So this stand-alone video was deleted, but his segment remains in the full show, plus the correction at the end of the next evenings show.

I'd like to know why Rex has seemingly been de-platformed from the CBC video archive?