Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)

*sticky

Stickying this post at the top of Sift Talk - sticky requested by dag.

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)

GorgonHeap has stepped forward to manage the "Geek" channel. Thank you.

(They're going fast)

This is a general 'channels' question:

I know there are a few couples out there that partner sift on the same name. What do you think about co-managing channels? Say if someone wanted to share management of a channel?

The original manager would be responsible... yet the partner he/she chooses could have editing access as well.

It would also be very useful if the manager went MIA or something and a major channel was left abandoned.

the ladybug effect

Messaged I'll take animation or nature

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)

Thanks Snipe, animation is yours.

I like the idea of co-managers SG, there isn't any way to do it at the moment, but might be a good one for a future relase.

Dag, what about ability to appoint others as channel managers. In case people are gone a long time? Others can edit the channel settings or add proper channel classifications? The would probably have to be other non-channel owning golds..

yes, also along this line.. Say we were to hand our channel over, may we offer it to gold members?

this could lead to abuse, in theory. You do create a channel, pass it to a goldie, create a new channel, and so on. But this is only theory: it's so easily spottable that shouldn't be considered a problem, I think.

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)

appointing someone else channel manager is fine, and the functionality is there - but keep in mind, that by doing this you are relinquishing your management of the the channel, it's up to your appointee to give it back.

There will never be another karaidl......I am waiting for a real cowboy, to give the *wildwestshow to.....