You're a Canadian, so I'll explain it for you :

When you get pulled over, you've got to sign the ticket for a couple of reasons. First, so the judge knows that you were present when the police officer issued the ticket, and second, acknowledging that you understand when and where you are supposed to appear in court. Every ticket issued in the US clearly states near the signature line that it is "NOT AN ADMISSION OF GUILT." What do you think this is: Mexico? China? Russia? Iran? We live in a very FAIR country. That police officer did everything by the book. That guy should have just signed the ticked, and disputed it in court. If you refuse to sign a ticket, they arrest you and take you to jail. They teach that to us when we're sixteen.


In reply to this comment by Fedquip:
Are you guys kidding me? The cop asked him to turn around. Not only are you cheering on the cops you think the chick should have been tasered?

Sure he should have just taken the ticket, agreed...But if you watch the full length version of the video the cop pulls him over at the traffic sign (which was a temporary sign, so the guy might be used to a different speed on that road)so I can understand his frustration with the cop.

What exactly did he have to sign? The cop wanted him to sign a paper, I have never had to sign anything when getting a ticket, was the cop asking him to admit guilt? Maybe they guy has never had a ticket before, and didn't know what the hell was going on. The cop wouldn't even tell him how fast he was going! I would have been outraged.

I just don't get it, the cop asked the guy to get out of his car because he didnt want to admit guilt? WATCH IT CLOSELY and imagine yourself in these peoples shoes, as the guy leaves his car the cop is already putting down his clip board and is ready to draw his taser, why is the guy getting arrested? What act did this guy do to provoke the gun to be pulled on him, he was pointing at the speeding sign, that was. I would be taken a little aback from that situation. No provocation, no threats, nothing the cop just pulled his gun and shot.

If you think this guy deserved to be tasered, I feel sorry for you.

Hahahahahahaha! I love you.


In reply to this comment by rychan:
Just because a machine can do it doesn't mean it's not impressive that a human does it. For instance, http://www.videosift.com/video/iHate-Innovative-Commenting-software could probably have created your belittling comment but I still appreciate that you did it by hand.

Heck yes, it is. His new album is lame. I bought it anyway because he's still awesome in my book.

In reply to this comment by kevin143:
Kenna's New Sacred Cow is by far one of my favorite albums. I just wish his new one was so good.

I'll explain it when you're older.

In reply to this comment by MarineGunrock:
I'm nit sure what I heard, but I know I liked it.
What is reverberation?

Hahaha. That's funny stuff. Way to call out an idiot know-it-all.


In reply to this comment by MarineGunrock:
Way to fucking spoil it for people that haven't played Episode two, Payback.
Also, there are no folders that contain specifically sounds. The only other files for HL2 are a couple of .bin files. Other than that, it's all been copied if you followed the instructions.
And yeah, it's a hack. "Hack: A clever solution to an interesting problem."
Hack doesn't necessarily mean dealing with code and shit, you know.

That's because it takes forever. Not very practical.

In reply to this comment by Farhad2000:
Am astonished I was never ever taught this in any level of academia...

I agree. Look what happened in Rwanda, Argentina, etc...

I guess we won't take sides unless it's just US vs THEM. Our gov't won't jump in after the sides have already been chosen.

Sad thing is, we'll probably arrest and convict someone for war crimes after it's too late.

In reply to this comment by Farhad2000:
All I can see for this is the eventual violent suppresion by the military junta, the international community decrying the events while doing absolutely nothing to stop it.

President Bush talked about promoting democractic progression around the world, here is one struggling to develop and break free from totalitarian rule. What does he do? Ignore it.

http://www.videosift.com/video/Halo-3-Museum-Advert#comment-222490

*commercial

Roger that. I'll let you know how it turns out when I try it on the Walgreens brand.

In reply to this comment by arvana:
It was a Dorcy Heavy Duty -- I just happened to have it lying around the garage; it was already dead, but I was curious.

In reply to this comment by deedub81:
I'm curious: What brand did you use.

In reply to this comment by arvana:
I tried this myself, and I too got the 4 large cells as in this video.

But it's all about the brand — somewhere out there must still be lurking the legendary AA-cell lantern battery.

I'm curious: What brand did you use.

In reply to this comment by arvana:
I tried this myself, and I too got the 4 large cells as in this video.

But it's all about the brand — somewhere out there must still be lurking the legendary AA-cell lantern battery.

oOOOooo! I'm not very observant, am I? Now I feel compelled and obligated to vote it up. Especially because I voted for the shorter, much more puny version.

In reply to this comment by jonny:
It's not a dupe. The original is less than 2 minutes, this one is over 6.
So how about going and voting for mine now?

In reply to this comment by deedub81:
DUPLICATE:

http://www.videosift.com/video/ronald-nancy-reagan-explain-why-drugs-are-GOOD

I do what I can.

In reply to this comment by gorgonheap:
This was on the sift before but apparently it is now MIA. good pickup.

Sh... sh... Shuddup! Doo doo head!

In reply to this comment by Farhad2000:

But why bother right? Watch Fox News and let them make your opinions for you

Leslie Parrish:

"Star Trek" .... Lieutenant Carolyn Palamas (1 episode, 1967)
... aka Star Trek: TOS (USA: promotional abbreviation)
... aka Star Trek: The Original Series (USA: informal title)

Internet Movie Database www.imdb.com

http://allyourtrekarebelongto.us/palamas.htm

Episode: TOS 033 - Who Mourns for Adonais?

In reply to this comment by swampgirl:
The woman in this I'm sure was in an episode of Star Trek (TOS) Someone tell me which one?

When it comes to my standards, morals, ethics, and ideals you better believe I'm "staunch" and "stubborn". I've seen and heard enough by now to know which side of the line I want to stand.

It's not my fault that I could take 10 - 15 excerpts from the Bin Laden transcripts and 10 - 15 lines from a Far Left Blog and you wouldn't be able to tell me which was which.

BTW: Good luck with that "Selective" Information Dissemination.

In reply to this comment by Farhad2000:
My sole interest is information dissemination.

But if you must know, I disagree with those comments because its telling when we let Bin Laden let us turn against one another politically, his usage of democrats and Iraq does two things, first placate the Democrats into not arguing for a withdrawl and feed into Bush's desire to sustain a war in Iraq thus letting him ride out in the sunset in January 2009 and hand this war over to which ever candidate gets elected.

The criticism of equaiting the Left with Bin Laden thus means anyone on the left is a homicidal luncatic, which is right considering we had nothing but lies about the war perpetuall from the white house. Who only gladdly accept the flak war between the left and right as it lets them go about their business undettered, mainly by limiting consititutional freedoms, escalating a war based on false pretences.

You have proven to be a staunch at times stubborn supporter of the right wing. So it's not suprising you pose this question to me.

In reply to this comment by deedub81:
I just wanted to clarify the reason why you have a problem with Brooks:

Is it because he calls the Far Left Bloggers "childish people", or that he points out the fact that Bin Laden is quoting them in his most recent video(therefore, Bin Laden obviously reads and agrees with said bloggers)?

In reply to this comment by Farhad2000:
CNN did the same thing equating progressives with terrorists.