Nope. I've been reading some of the Cannes reviews and this thing looks terrifying. I can't wait. Here is a bit of humor based off the clip you posted. http://www.videosift.com/video/Satanic-Mr-Fox

In reply to this comment by EndAll:
Thanks DFT! Have you seen the full thing yet?

In reply to this comment by dystopianfuturetoday:
*quality
*horrorshow

Your video, Trailer for Wes Anderson's "Fantastic Mr. Fox", has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

Thanks, deputydog.

In reply to this comment by deputydog:
*quality

this will be fucking awesome. i've been waiting nervously for this trailer, turns out there's nothing to worry about. wes anderson + bill murray + stop-motion + roald dahl? holy shit yes please right now fill my face uh huh.

I think the Sift definition of Snuff is a little off. Here is what the dictionary states.

"snuff film
–noun
1. Slang. a pornographic film that shows an actual murder of one of the performers, as at the end of a sadistic act."

another source

"snuff film
n. Slang
A movie in a purported genre of explicit pornography culminating in the actual violent death of a participant in a sex act."


Not sure why this is snuff, either way, this is big news, front page stills from this video are all over the newspapers up here. This Video has also been playing on the news, it's quite a big story. CBC, the Telegraph, CTV and more news outlets are all posting this video. It's a very important piece of evidence in a very important debate about Taser guns.

Personally I don't care to watch clips that involve people dying, but there is not shortage of death scenes on the sift. The difference with this death and "cinematic death" is that there is an actual victim in this case, there is a story behind this video.

Gorgonheap says...
"So I request from Mr. Fox that it be discarded out of respect for people who are no longer alive to see their death displayed as entertainment to millions."

I hope you did not find this video entertaining. But If I was tasered to death by cops, the sift has full permission to spread the video far and wide, more eyes need to see this abuse of power and understand it.

Effen bullshit both of em. I request for a discard. I'd do it myself but the backlash from sick bystanders screaming for this kind of shit would bring it back to life anyway. So I request from Mr. Fox that it be discarded out of respect for people who are no longer alive to see their death displayed as entertainment to millions.

seems like mr. fox likes the smell of bear bum poo... or something...

My video board is about a gig low so it takes forever to load foriegn media players .I'll try to figure this out without seeing it . Let me get this straight . First Micheal J . shakes ...then Rush gets upset and says Mr fox is a fake ......Your just pissed off Rush 'cause you didn't think of it first ...Years ago you could have come on TV shaking and say " My self 'been better since rehab !?!" and we would have all loved your big baby head . But No , we hate you now and now you have attacked Mr. Family ties ...you are an idiot .....you big doof !
and as far as stem cells go I still believe the earth is the center of the universe so don't ask me .

First of all.. I probably have listen to Rush for more years than most of you.. And luckily I have been deprogrammed. For you mental giants who still run around spouting (let alone even thinking) "Rush is right" on anything.. well you need to check for lobotomy scars.

My idiot parents are repeating all these same talking points about Rush in defense of his attack on a person with a TERMINAL DISEASE. Now, my parents are only idiots, because like Wumpus and some others, they believe this Rush crap hook and line..

Rush: "I did NOT mock or make fun of Mr. Fox."
Me: HELLO!?! Asshole I have two eyes. I'm pretty sure a second grader would agree that you were in fact making fun of MJFox.

That's right Wumpus and Slurr.. The average 8 year olds are smarter than both of yous.

"providing some source links would be most welcome and circumspect, wumpus"
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/eibessential3/mjf0.member.html

Forget the link...thats my bad.

Here you are straight from the horse's mouth.

"I believe Democrats have a long history of using victims of various things as POLITICAL spokespeople because they believe they are untouchable, infallible. They are immune from criticism. But when anyone enters the POLITICAL arena of ideas they forfeit the right to be challenged on their participation and message.

I have not met Mr. Fox, do not know him. I have admired his work in film and TV and his appearances on Letterman were howlers. I have nothing personal against him. But I believe his implication that only Democrats want to cure disease(s) is irresponsible (as I believed about John Edwards assuring voters Christopher Reeve would walk if only John Kerry were elected). I think this is ultimately cruel and gives people who suffer these terrible afflictions false hope.

As of now there is NO EVIDENCE that embryonic stem cells even hold promise, while other approaches, such as adult stem cells, already have yielded results. Michael's TV spots mislead and misinform on this. (You might ask him about the gene therapy research at a Chicago hospital which has produced encouraging results on Parkinson's patients. A VIRUS is inserted in the gene, which is then inserted in the brain. The Michael J. Fox Foundations has committed $1.9 million to further research on this...story from earlier this month.)

I did NOT mock or make fun of Mr. Fox. I have seen him many times on TV but never have I seen him as he appears in the ads. I read from his own book that he will not take his medications before certain appearances (Senate, 1999) in order to illustrate the ravages of Parkinson's, which I understand and applaud. So the concept of manipulating meds has been stated by Mr. Fox, which is what caused me to question his appearance in his ads.

He is stumping for Democrats, in the political arena, and is therefore open to analysis and criticism as we all are. His suffering is NOT fair game and I am sorry if people drew that conclusion about my comments, but I believe this happens precisely because NO criticism of victims is ever allowed, at all, which as I say is the Democrat strategy in putting them forward."