search results matching tag: Tim Minchin
» channel: nordic
go advanced with your query
Search took 0.000 seconds
Videos (106) | Sift Talk (1) | Blogs (28) | Comments (182) |
Videos (106) | Sift Talk (1) | Blogs (28) | Comments (182) |
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
Five Poofs And Two Pianos - Tim Minchin
*dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/Tim-Minchin-5-Poofs-and-2-Piano-s
Five Poofs And Two Pianos - Tim Minchin
This video has been nominated as a duplicate of this video by Hybrid. If this nomination is seconded with *isdupe, the video will be killed and its votes transferred to the original.
The Five Giveaway (Updated) (Sift Talk Post)
http://videosift.com/video/Five-Poofs-And-Two-Pianos-Tim-Minchin
*dupe
Ten Foot C*ck And A Few Hundred Virgins
This video has been seconded as a duplicate; transferring votes to the original video and killing this dupe - dupeof seconded with isdupe by Boise_Lib.
Ten Foot C*ck And A Few Hundred Virgins
*dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/Tim-Minchin-A-Ten-Foot-Cock-and-a-Few-Hundred-Virgins
Ten Foot C*ck And A Few Hundred Virgins
This video has been nominated as a duplicate of this video by Lilithia. If this nomination is seconded with *isdupe, the video will be killed and its votes transferred to the original.
RFlagg (Member Profile)
Your video, Tim Minchin - Mitsubishi Colt, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.
This achievement has earned you your "Pop Star" Level 7 Badge!
Tim Minchin - Mitsubishi Colt
Once again the genius of Tim Minchin!
Tim Minchin's Matilda, A Musical Trailer
Tim Minchin + Roald Dahl = Instant Upvote.
Tim Minchin - The Good Book
This video has been seconded as a duplicate; transferring votes to the original video and killing this dupe - dupeof seconded with isdupe by spoco2.
Tim Minchin - The Good Book
2 more comments have been lost in the ether at this killed duplicate.
Tim Minchin - The Good Book
*dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/Tim-Minchin-The-Good-Book
Tim Minchin - The Good Book
This video has been nominated as a duplicate of this video by luxury_pie. If this nomination is seconded with *isdupe, the video will be killed and its votes transferred to the original.
chris hedges on secular and religious fundamentalism
>> ^rottenseed:
The problem with religion, though—as our friend Tim Minchin says—it teaches us to externalize blame. What I mean is, religion paints a very binary portrait of the world—of what's right and wrong. It doesn't teach relativity or tolerance. I think it's ok to assume that if we eliminate religion, the basis for that ignorance will lose power.
See, while I don't agree with everything Hedges said here, I think this is the kind of talk that he's referring to. That statement you made just painted all religions in one broad stroke and set it up as if it is "us," the intelligent and tolerant people, versus "them," the ignorant and intolerant masses. It's that kind of rhetoric that he (and I for that matter) find divisive and counterproductive. Religious people--many of them Christians--who would have agreed with you that it is wrong to deny basic human rights to people (such as the right to marry) on the basis of their sexuality are now painted as your opponents instead.
Furthermore, while certainly some forms of religion as practiced by certain peoples in certain countries at certain times do in fact fit your description of religion quite well, "religion" as a concept does not. There's nothing about religion per se that requires a binary worldview nor does it require a lack of relativity or tolerance. I'd definitely agree with you that some instantiations of religion, though, have turned out that way.
I said it in the Greta Christina Sift that I linked to above, but I'll say it more clearly now: I think attacking "religion" is Don Quixotic. Time is better spent attacking specific features of specific religions in specific contexts that result in suffering, such as the denial of marriage to homosexuals on religions grounds, female genital mutilation, and so forth. These kinds of things anger both theists and atheists and we should all work together to eliminate them rather than squabble with each other over our individual preference to believe or not believe in a particular religion.
chris hedges on secular and religious fundamentalism
So you're saying that if it wasn't for religion humans would find some other aspect of human nature to exploit? Not really profound, but it really does make sense. For example, religion is being used as a means to deny gays the same rights the rest of us have. However, when it comes down to it, some people just feel that homosexuality is icky. And you know what? As ignorant as that is, it's just as natural for somebody to be repulsed by certain sexual behaviors as it is to be attracted to some sexual behaviors. As long as people disagree there will be conflict. The problem with religion, though—as our friend Tim Minchin says—it teaches us to externalize blame. What I mean is, religion paints a very binary portrait of the world—of what's right and wrong. It doesn't teach relativity or tolerance. I think it's ok to assume that if we eliminate religion, the basis for that ignorance will lose power. Furthermore, if somebody doesn't agree with something that's ok. And since there is no god, therefore no word of god, our differences are merely individual preference.>> ^peggedbea:
I want to believe that this is the point chris hedge's is attempting to make:
whenever i listen to or read anything from sam harris i feel like he's trying to blame religion for all the evil. but i don't feel like he's naming it correctly. there's a more basic manipulation taking place. religion is simply the chosen mechanism. religion is a tool for social control. faith is a rather benign human characteristic. people WANT to have faith in something. and religion manipulates that desire to control X population. it's not the faith in something mystic and silly that fucks up the world, it's the emotional manipulation employed. but in alternate universe B, maybe the mechanism for social control looks completely different. and there are more than one mechanism for social control happening in this universe. class and race and sex are the most obvious. in harris's effort to vilify one single mechanism, instead of the underlying attribute (you could call it greed?), it often feels like he's creating another kind of tribalism. us vs. them. smart atheists vs. stupid evil religious people. i feel very divisive when i listen to him and his ilk. i'd rather not dislike religious people. i'd rather focus all my bad feelings on the men who manipulate basest desires to control the masses for financial gain. i'd rather hear more about who they are and how to stop them then about how insane religious people are going to destroy all of creation.