Should Siftbot Get His Own *Robot Channel?
Sifty has been here from the very beginning. It's about time he got his own channel.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
17 Comments
omg, sifty got dft - ruuuuun!
Does he have a diamond? We don't give channels to the common riff-raff like softbot.
Yes, but when he earns it.
Hey already runs videosift, why would we give him a channel? That's like giving ice to an Eskimo.
I'm not people.
what will be the name of the channel - *robots or *skynet?
*overlords
Only if he follows some rules first.
Are we suggesting Equality for Robots???
*quality!
^But siftbot himself doesn't agree, and puts down a veto. Is he shy for the attention? Or does he have some other nefarious plan that could be disrupted by having a channel? I see no other reason why I shouldn't be able to *quality a poll.
Fuck siftbot! He's a punk ass bitch, and I'll whop his tin can ass if I ever see him. Motherfucker!
siftbot should get his own asshole channel, cheeky mf.
"Hey already runs videosift, why would we give him a channel? That's like giving ice to an Eskimo."
So now you're anti-Eskimo? Watch it.
>> ^Throbbin:
"Hey already runs videosift, why would we give him a channel? That's like giving ice to an Eskimo."
So now you're anti-Eskimo? Watch it.
you anti-anti-Eskimo people are such tools.
I agree we need a Robots channel, but I don't like assigning it to the ghost in the machine. There are already enough channels without owners as it is. Sorry bro.
Now if we created a Robots channel and had an actual human being lined up to take it over then I would have no objection, but let's not give it to a figment of the Sift's imagination.
The can has enough power as it is. Oh how I hate the can.
Please don't tell the can I said that.
Voting for this poll ended with the majority of users voting Yes.
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.