while on the surface this assertion may appear controversial but if given further consideration,the truth of the matter becomes quite evident.the statist uses the exact same moral calculus that a religious fundamentalist uses to excuse or justify abhorrent behavior.

so when a muslim perpetrates a violent or brutal act it is "terrorism",but when an agent of the state perpetrates an act of violence or brutality,it is somehow more acceptable and sometimes even morally justified.using the very same language the the religious fundamentalist uses.twisting the intent to be a more palatable undertaking and therefore ease the conscience of the population.

yet both are violent and brutal acts which destroy lives.