i got ya SDG.
this is worth a watch.
*promote

HAH !@ got ya on that one ! act first, talk after.

Ha! Shuac got ya! BURN!

>> ^shuac:

Prop 19, the ballet initiative that would've decriminalized marijuana in California...
I would've preferred a ballroom dance initiative or maybe square dancing. But ballet? I dunno, something about ballet rubs me the wrong way. As a dance form, it's far too inaccessible and un-participatory. Know what I mean?

Thanks, my friend. Yours was the one to put it over the top.
In reply to this comment by enoch:
i got ya stormsinger..
great voice and this belongs in *electronica
and it deserves to be sifted
*promote

i got ya stormsinger..
great voice and this belongs in *electronica
and it deserves to be sifted
*promote

Thanks so much!

In reply to this comment by gwiz665:
Got ya covered @rich_magnet

*quality *doublepromote

Got ya covered @rich_magnet

*quality *doublepromote

In reply to this comment by enoch:
got ya back brother.
http://videosift.com/video/CHOGGIE-gives-hairstyling-a-go
Yoo fooos,ya!

got ya back brother.
http://videosift.com/video/CHOGGIE-gives-hairstyling-a-go

i got ya sage.
*promote!

I got ya covered.

In reply to this comment by ant:
Ah frak! Sorry about that. How do I put it back?

In reply to this comment by gwiz665:
Why discuss?

In reply to this comment by ant:
SkyNet!*discuss

oh GDI...missed the frikkin party again.
at least i got ya on your page.
gratzies endall...i truly love your posts.

i got ya westy,
and i understood that it was just an example.i responded to sia,but it pertains to your comment also.
i think i clarified my point..i tried to anyway.
the taliban is more about control of land and commerce than religion.its the religion they hide behind to enact their control.my response alludes to that.

ok,
so you just gave a longer version of your original point.
then ask me questions i already answered.
and where is this mans right of redress and protest an "opinion"?
you disagree with his methods..ok..got ya.
i dont,for reasons i have already stated.
i enjoy a frisky debate,maybe too much sometimes,but this is no longer a debate.
it's an exercise in circular logic,and it will bear no fruit.
remember my friend,it was YOU who called me to this table.
my original post was misunderstood by MGR(i think anyways),but others,including you decided to take a swipe.
i set my premise,made my argument and i stand by it.
maybe it would help if i said i thought the guy was a sanctimonious prick,because i do,but that would not alter my original point.
you...
on the other hand,did NOT make your argument,at least in a quantitative sense.
if i may be allowed to sum up your argument.
"the guy was acting like a rude dickhead harrassing those people who did nothing to him."
i actually agree with that,but that had NOTHING to do with my argument.
my point is he had a RIGHT to do that,and i did not necessarily disagree with his methods.he may be a sanctimonious prick,but he has the RIGHT to be a sanctimonious prick.
the minute you start censoring which form of protest is acceptable (already done btw.i linked the page)and which ones offend the tender sensibilities of a choice few,when will that form of censor stop?
the RIGHT to protest peaceably,even if unpopular,should never be tampered with.because the minute one right is gone,its gone forever.
while this man may have been annoying,he didnt not harm anyone.did not threaten and when asked to leave,he did just that.
dont be so quick to throw away a right based on a "personal opinion".
thats all im saying.
disagree with his tactics,hell..hate the man if you want,but dont fuck with that freedom.
we already have "free speech" zones,lets not give big brother any more reason to shut us up.
seewhatimsayin?
in any case,nice tossin the debate ball with ya.
hope you at least see where im coming from,
if not..
well..
dont know what to tell ya bud.
peace.

happy canada day..or whatever..lol,
got ya some treats:
http://www.videosift.com/video/TRIUMPH-lay-it-on-the-line-legendary-hard-rock-band-LIVE